Talk:Diana Vickers/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Time to restore this article: Comment to Triwbe |
|||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Yes, but you have to give a reason within Wikipedia's policies, this is not a vote. Read [[WP:N]] and [[WP:BAND]] and discuss. --[[User:Triwbe|Triwbe]] ([[User talk:Triwbe|talk]]) 16:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
Yes, but you have to give a reason within Wikipedia's policies, this is not a vote. Read [[WP:N]] and [[WP:BAND]] and discuss. --[[User:Triwbe|Triwbe]] ([[User talk:Triwbe|talk]]) 16:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
{{find}} |
{{find}} |
||
Triwbe, I'm not necessarily opposed to the article being restored, but could you link to some sources? I had a quick google and nothing immediately leapt out at me as notable. I take your point re: the X Factor line show, but I'd regard that as justification for an article on the X Factor live show, not necessarily the individual acts (I'm open to arguments, however!) Cheers, [[User:This flag once was red|<b style="color:#000">This flag once was red</b>]]<sup>[[User talk:This flag once was red|<span style="color:#f00">propaganda</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/This flag once was red|deeds]]</sub> 16:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:18, 9 June 2009
 | Biography NA‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to List of The X Factor finalists (UK series 5)#Diana Vickers. |
It's come back again. I'm going to reinstate the redirect on these grounds:
- The AfD was closed, and there has since been no consensus to restore this as a separate article.
- The information still gives no evidence, let alone sourced evidence, that she has established independent notability.
- It was reverted to a version in which the table is messy, apparently from before cleanups were made prior to the AfD.
- User:Hithere2008 has been restore-warring against consensus; at the moment it seems that the article is here only as a result of this.
If a reason to restore this as an independent article crops up, please discuss here first. -- Smjg (talk) 15:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Well If lower placed Ruth Lorenzo has an article why hasn't she they have both been signed 86.161.252.78 (talk) 22:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- The question is not of why Diana doesn't have an article, but of why Ruth does. I'm not sure. But the real criterion is notability, not whether "signed" or not. And anyway, two wrongs don't make a right. -- Smjg (talk) 01:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
I'd like to know why the page was deleted yet Ruth Lorenzo who is unsigned has a page and has nothing that makes her need a page, when deleting the page for Diana i was told it was because she hasnt released any music, well neither has Ruth. --Hithere2008 (talk) 18:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Time to restore this article
She clearly passes WP:BAND criteria 4 since she has received non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country. This goes for all X-factor live show acts. --Triwbe (talk) 18:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- More - by these guidlines Wikipedia:WikiProject Idol series#Biographies of contestants, she also passes notability (Yanks consider anyone making the live shows as a finalist). --Triwbe (talk) 13:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
This article cleary needs to be restored! - sumeet_92 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumeet 92 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes, but you have to give a reason within Wikipedia's policies, this is not a vote. Read WP:N and WP:BAND and discuss. --Triwbe (talk) 16:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Triwbe, I'm not necessarily opposed to the article being restored, but could you link to some sources? I had a quick google and nothing immediately leapt out at me as notable. I take your point re: the X Factor line show, but I'd regard that as justification for an article on the X Factor live show, not necessarily the individual acts (I'm open to arguments, however!) Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 16:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)