User talk:Hithere2008

April 2008

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. V-train (talk) 18:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My edits aren't vandalism, i corrected the time of each film as i have them all on DVD and those were the correct times given on the back of the DVDs

Source for the Mama Mia story?

A quick googling didn't turn up any source for the mama mia audition info you added to the Lindsay Lohan and Rachel McAdams articles: [1] [2], so I removed it. Find a source before re-adding it. Thank you. Siawase (talk) 11:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pirates of the Caribbean films

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please stop adding United Kingdom to the films' infobox under origin. The movies originated in the United States. Whoville (talk) 14:24, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Country label in a movie's infobox refers to the location of the company or studio that made the film  Disney, in this case  not the nationality of the actors. Also, it's helpful to other editors if you could sign your talk page comments. Whoville (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Cheetah Girls 2. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. The information included in an article must agree to that in the underlying source. —C.Fred (talk) 16:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008.

Please do not link the dates and add unsourced material to the High School Musical 3: Senior Year page. It is against the policy. If you continue this, you will be reported and possibly blocked. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 16:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding the links of countries and dates. And if the certification is true, please show a source. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 16:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The letters "PG" nor "parental guidance" are listed in the 'source' you have provided. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 17:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I am clearly mistaken. My deepest apologizes and happy editing here at Wikipedia. --H E L LØ ŦH E R E 17:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:LeonaLewisWI 468x666.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:LeonaLewisWI 468x666.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 15:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:081007 gl Diana.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:081007 gl Diana.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 15:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Burke

Never revert good faith edits without comment, especially when the good faith edits were actually beneficial to the article. Non-free media should be used only if it is irreplaceable, and someone could easily take a picture of Burke. Please take a read of our non-free content guidelines. J Milburn (talk) 16:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that you have been doing similar things on List of The X Factor finalists (UK series 5). Please remember that you do not own any of the articles on Wikipedia, and that edit warring will not be tolerated. J Milburn (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Vickers

Please do not recreate this article at the moment. Wait until she has some notability per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Vickers. Thank you John Sloan (view / chat) 17:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What happens with other contestants has nothing to do with this AfD. Ruth's is currently at AfD and likely to be redirected as well. JLS & Eoghan passed because they made the final. John Sloan (view / chat) 17:27, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not happy with the outcome of an AfD, you'll have to take it to deletion review. John Sloan (view / chat) 17:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Vickers as it has closed. Please see deletion review as linked above if you feel so strongly about this. John Sloan (view / chat) 17:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can only suggest that you take your time and read through the instructions. Cheers! John Sloan (view / chat) 17:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok thanks, sorry i didnt know how to do that, thanks for the help --Hithere2008 (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One Tree Hill

I apologize for the revert, I get alerted whenever a page is edited by an IP. I didnt see what you were trying to do. T-95(talk)

Edie Britt

Just leave the Edie Britt page alone. AdamDeanHall (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BB10

Wait for Channel4, and we don't link dates. Darrenhusted (talk) 22:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DJ 10:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Supernatural (season 5). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ophois (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Take It Off (song), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of songs in Glee (season 2), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yves (talk) 13:34, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hithere2008. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]