User talk:Director

Home   Talk   Contributions   Archives Make yourself at home....

I usually reply to posted messages here, but if the message is important I'll notify you on on your talkpage as well. If I posted a message on your talkpage I will reply there, but feel free to notify me on my talk if you feel it is urgent. I'd prefer it if noone removed content here, but naturally I have no objections if it's just grammar. Please don't revert my edits on this page. Finally: no insults. I can take criticism as much as the next guy, but outright personal attacks will be reverted and reported. Reply Hello, Director. You have new messages at Dottydotdot's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Serbian surnames AfD!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Serbian_surnames Please share your thoughts at the page above. I read your comment at the discussion-page of "Serbian surnames". Thank you in advance!! Cantabo07 (talk) 05:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Hello Comrade! Just here to wise you a nice day and to say goodbye. Also try not to write so hard like the old Soviet Union propaganda machine (it has no style). Ps. Oh Please don’t delete me. What a Cry baby! Sir Floyd (talk) 11:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Thanks - are you planning to open a sock puppet investigation request? Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Deleting users' comments on a talk page Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the dispute between yourself and User:Sir Floyd at Talk:Josip Broz Tito, it was inappropriate for you to delete his or her talk page comments absent a compelling reason. See WP:TPO ("The basic rule is: Do not strike out or delete the comments of other editors without their permission"). WP:NOTFORUM is not such a reason.- Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 04:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Its not a "dispute" (no sources, no proposed changes), the guy is simply a sock trying to pick a fight and create a conflict out of nothing. Nobody is "worshiping dictators" on Wikipedia. This is simply User:Brunodam or User:Luigi 28, attempting to get back at me for reporting their socks all the time. All posts of User:Sir Floyd should be removed from Wiki. I know its all my claims, and I do intend to file a checkuser, but I'm going on vacation in like 30 minutes :P. And anyway its so obvious you really ought to take my word for it. He just announced his "departure from wiki", right after I told him outright that I know he's a sock. Regards --DIREKTOR (TALK) 07:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC) None of that matters. Do not strike out or delete the comments of other editors without their permission unless one of the exceptions outlined in WP:TPO or another exception within the same broad thrust applies. That you disagree with the comment or suspect the comment of being a sock is not a good enough reason. If the former, ignore or rejoin. If the latter, file an SPI request. That aside, have a good vacation. :) - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 12:59, 7 August 2009 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009) The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2009 (UTC) == Call for arbitration if you think we are at an impasse.Rex Dominator (talk) 08:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC) ARBCOM? For your content blanking? Are you joking? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 08:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC) DIREKTOR, your statements are delusional. Look at what a real encyclopedia Britannica defines Cetniks as: member of a Serbian nationalist guerrilla force that formed during World War II to resist the Axis invaders and Croatian collaborators but that primarily fought a civil war against the Yugoslav communist guerrillas, the Partisans.. Your action are creating a propaganda article by placing WP:UNDUEWEIGHT on the fascist collaboration. Please request a mediation if you don't agree with the definition of the encyclopedia.since your actions are not logical. I keep giving you facts and you keep attacking me and frankly im sick of these attacks.Rex Dominator (talk) 09:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Please tell me how i can get a mediation and how to report people since im new.Rex Dominator (talk) 10:05, 13 August 2009 (UTC) LoL... :) --DIREKTOR (TALK) 10:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC) A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Mediation case name has been filed with the Mediation Committee (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Mediation case name and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not. Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy; further information on Wikipedia's policy on resolving disagreements is at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an active mediator of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list (click here for details). Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission. Thank you, Rex Dominator (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC). Hello Hello, I think that you have to sign your name on the mediation in order for it to take place.Rex Dominator (talk) 16:06, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Hello DIREKTOR. You have been mentioned in a discussion at User talk:Toddst1#hello. EdJohnston (talk) 18:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Warning Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chetniks, you will be blocked from editing. Who is that? Mum? is this some kind of joke? You guys... :) --DIREKTOR (TALK) 15:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Stop You're removing from sources that are not Encyclopedia friendly. For example I have placed the tag behind some information cited by a blog. You keep removing these tags.Rex Dominator (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC) again It's okay to edit however you deleting a lot of content. please be mindful when you edit you don't delete content.Rex Dominator (talk) 17:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Golee gee!, is it ok to edit? Thanks mister! :D Rex, your stuff was simply moved from the lede alongside other trivia on the Chetniks. Next time, READ more carefully. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 18:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Stop spamming Honestly man, chill out, stop spamming me with the sock templates. I find it funny that someone else was there to back my claims that your edits are horrible. More funny is the fact that you think its a sock. Yet the saddest part is that admins and editors alike have wasted so much time fighting against your menace. Rex Dominator (talk) 22:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC) The thing is a sock, no question. I probably got its sockpuppeteer banned (or will get him banned real soon). Now then, what do you mean "spamming"? You're supposed to have the tag when a sockpuppet investigation is on about you! And you're not supposed to remove it. If you're "not a sockpuppteer" you've got nothing to bother you about it. Put it back... oh what do I care anyway... Admins and editors fighting against me? Well, maybe not admins, but I certainly have been countering a lot of Croatian, Serbian, Italian, and Bosniak nationalist IPs, "crusaders" (as you guys are called), and just plain stupid guys. You wouldn't believe how many guys got blocked just for not being able to wait out a 24 hour block, or they create a ridiculously obvious sock to agree with them. Don't you worry Rex old boy, "my menace" is here to stay. It only gets more annoying and "menacing" as the months and years go by... xD gosh I'm evil --DIREKTOR (TALK) 22:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Not now, when? "If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And when I am for myself, what am 'I'? And if not now, when?" and why not now? what is gained by waiting...? The lie is around the world already.... Stellarkid (talk) 01:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Personal attacks Hello. Could you explain what this is about? It seems like a blatant violation of WP:NPA to me. Thank you, Kotiwalo (talk) 08:19, 16 August 2009 (UTC) Section I don't care if you add information that supports the Axis collarboration if its properly cited. I have nothing to prove on that page. If you have valid info, irregardless of whoe the info supports, and if its cited well, then i will not have a problem. However, be sure that I will try my hardest not to allow you to add information that is cited by a blog, or other controversial sources.Rex Dominator (talk) 10:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC) Who cares of your checkups? Keep asking for check ups, Direktor (LOL...). You better get a giyl or you'll get crazy soon....(LOL...)