User talk:White Shadows

Coldplay Expert

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

That means you Spongefrog...Oh I mean Lord Spongefrog! and Notedgrant

---

White Shadows

Looking at the article you've written, I don't think so just yet. WP:NSONGS states that have ranked on a national chart are "probably notable" (my stress). The song still needs to comply with WP:GNG in that it has been discussed in depth in multiple reliable sources. If you can find any newspaper or music magazine articles that talk about the song in some detail that would go a long way to helping establish notability.

By the way, what source did you use for the Mexican chart position? WP:GOODCHARTS only has a reliable source listed for archives of the Mexican album chart. It would be useful if we had a reliable source for the singles chart as well. --JD554 (talk) 06:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the Advice

Just wanted to let you know that I got ur message and will do!!--NemesisofReason 11:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:LifeinTechnicolorII

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JD554 (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

What did I do, I never made that...--Coldplay Expert 16:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I've corrected it for the correct template. --JD554 (talk) 16:36, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

warchief

i know its not social networking, duh. i gotta find something wrong to edit though, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Penguin Warchief (talk • contribs) 15:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Not really, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 16:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Talking

Dear...Anyone who decides to read this including:

• User:Guitarherochristopher
• User:Notedgrant
• User:Orangesodakid
• User:Nemesis of Reason
• User:Penguin Warchief

And anyone else that I have forgoten. As a result of recent events in which people belive that I am in wikipedia only for myspace, I will now only talk about wikipedia related articles ect. I will only casualy talk to people once in a while. (This rule does not apply to LSP's talk page.)

--Coldplay Expert 17:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I want everyone to know that I'm not involved with the myspace thing, I just don't have time to make big edits, and articals, to tell the truth, my first edit got delated, so that kind of detered me from making big edits, so aneway, I not involved with the thing CE metioned above.--Orangesodakid 18:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Well done, old chap. Rather drastic, if course, but indisputably the most responsible course of action. Even I could not do a thing of such magnitude, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 18:18, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I am observing the imbracketed clause at the bottom of said post, never mind. Even better, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 18:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I am not involved with that Myspace Wikipedia thing. It's just that I need some user to adopt me and teach me how to edit articles, make articles etc. so if anyone would like to adopt me, please send me a message!!! Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemesis of Reason (talk • contribs) 18:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

read that --NotedGrant Talk 19:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

fun

bold and random edit, yea!--Orangesodakid 17:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

You should be ashamed of yourself. Have you no respect for the above thread! Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 18:19, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Your kinda contradicting yourself there.--Coldplay Expert 18:27, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

sorry, I have a habbit of saying (in this cace typing) random things. Pudding.--Orangesodakid 18:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Adoption

Can you PLEASE adopt me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--NemesisofReason 18:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Me? Well, I'm not th - wait. Crap. I keep thinking this is my talk page. Won't happen again, I swear. Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 18:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I'LL ADOPT YOU! ;D --Scythre^Talk_Contribs 18:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Umm...im not that good with teaching others on WP. Why dont you try User:Dylan620 he will accept you and teach you everything.--Coldplay Expert 18:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

artical you should check out

I really think you should check out this artical, its called Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing--Orangesodakid 22:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

just thought you would like to see it.--Orangesodakid 22:47, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

memeries

this is where I got the idea for that sock puppet, remeber that, Oh memeries, heres the link gurren lagann (you can delete this if you want)--Orangesodakid 23:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Um..even though it was kinda funny. I wouldnt be proud of that if I were you.--Coldplay Expert 23:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm not, I just thought you would want to see where I got the idea, once again, I'm sorry for all the trubble it caused you.--Orangesodakid 23:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Cookie

Orangesodakid has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

--Orangesodakid 23:28, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

GHC

From my understanding of the matter, Roux's proposed solution seems to be the best way to handle the situation. Chris had potential to be good, especially looking at his work on Coldplay tour articles. But lately he'd gone down hill by focusing on creating himself new userpages and not editing articles. Deserted Cities (talk) 00:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Latin America Tour II

I don't know if it's part of the Viva La Vida Tour or not, it depends what it gets called by reliable sources. You don't need my permission to create articles, as long as you feel an article complies with the relevant guidelines/policies such as WP:GNG, WP:MUSIC etc then you should be WP:BOLD. Don't forget to add references from reliable sources to show how any article you do created meets the criteria and you should be fine. --JD554 (talk) 06:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Seems a reasonable name to me. --JD554 (talk) 10:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wallflowers

Hey, Coldplay Expert, you should look at

and see if you can edit or add some more references. Just wanted to help you in some more edits!!--NemesisofReason 17:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah--NemesisofReason 17:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

How to change font type

How do I change the font type on my sig?--NemesisofReason 17:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

after font color add face="required foot type" alternately just check the Html of my sig the part face="high tower text" ,I learnt signing from a question asked by coldplay expert on his eminence's page-- NotedGrant Talk 19:22, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:23, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

tagging

I checked your contributions most(atleast the first page) of them include tagging problematic articles WP:TWINKLE helps in tagging ,prodding,csding articles it includes a rollback tool too --NotedGrant Talk 18:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Your comment on my talk page

which edit do you mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.176.245.15 (talk) 10:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

worried for nemesis

Yeah, nemesis of reason might be leaving wiki, cuase he made a hidden page. he's been nominated for speedy deletion. yeah... i guess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Penguin Warchief (talk • contribs) 15:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi Coldplay Expert, I saw that you asked for rollback rights and were asked to wait a bit before asking for it again. (The reason I saw it was because I was looking at your recent contributions in connection with your name coming up at WP:ANI.) Anyway, as a regular user and non-admin who does have rollback I just wanted to advise you to spend some time fighting vandalism by regular means - I know (trust me, I know!) how frustrating it can be to see a vandalism revert fail because somebody else was there first, but try to think about it in terms of how good it is that there are plenty of vandalism fighters making sure that the vandals never get the upper hand. And rollback, you should be aware, should only be used to revert obvious vandalism; good-faith edits that add errors shouldn't be reverted with Rollback. For that reason it is probably a good idea to revert vandalism with regular editing for a while first, making sure that you add explanatory edit summaries if the vandalism isn't obvious. That will show the administrators that you know what you are doing, next time you ask for the tool.

Just my two smallish coins' worth of advice - take it or ignore it as you like. Again, I'm not an admin so these are just my opinions. Best, --bonadea contributions talk 18:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Please.

Hey, i did my best to defend myself, if there's anything you can do, please help.--Penguin Warchief 12:33, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Hey Coldplay Expert. Sorry I'm responding so late (I haven't checked my talk page in a while). I would just like to thank you for that comment you left. You are my best wikifriend and I we understand each other, so thank you. By the way, what's Guitarherochristopher up to? He tried to make a page for "We Never Change", but it was just like his one for "Sparks". You should tell him to user the infoboxes and stuff. Tell him I said hi!. See ya round!!!--99.14.139.38 (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

talk back

"a specail guest" and I responded to you on S-dogz talk page (I think that is one of his nicknames). regards--Orangesodakid 00:07, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

You've all seen a lot of drama lately, haven't you?

Wow... is there anyone left for you to be a sockpuppet of? :) You'll get through it okay. Warchief, Nemesis, and to a lesser degree Orangesodakid have had a rocky start on Wikipedia, but it looks like they're good to go now. I just hope they aren't too discouraged by so many ANI threads.

Oh, and you might like to know that some users have legitimate alternate accounts that they can log onto when they don't feel safe logging onto their main account where they are. My adopter User:Damërung has one. A little insignificant ^{Talk to me!} _{(I have candy!)} 10:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, there has been quite a bit of drama and suspected sockpuppetry. )IM NOT A SP!) anyway Ive been pretty coll on this and I hope things pass by without much more drama. I am applying to rollback and because of this the admins are asking tons of questions. Another bad thing is that now my reputation is ruined! Ill never be an admin now :(--Coldplay Expert 10:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict) You're reputation isn't ruined just because you got accused of being a sock! Tons of admins have been accused of worse things! As I see it, you encouraged your friends to get on Wikipedia. When they made mistakes, you not only defended them, you helped them to resolve their issues and taught them what they should do next time. Rather than just protecting them from being blocked, you actually helped them to become better contributors. That I think is incredibly admirable.

Also, I fully support your applying for rollback. I've commented on the thread, hope it helps. I still feel bad for initially accusing you of socking that one time. XD But you're all right. A little insignificant ^{Talk to me!} _{(I have candy!)} 15:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Its all ok, I understand and BTW thanks for the support for rollback. Cheers.--Coldplay Expert 16:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

answer

yes, I do still need help on how to fight vandals. regards--Orangesodakid 14:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Talk Back

You have new messages

Hello, White Shadows. You have new messages at Pedro's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

huh?

what? what do you mean about adoptee? I havent adopted anybody, I still concider myself a N00B(lol). regards.--Orangesodakid 22:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC

Ok, thats butter, and its Dylen620, I have a UB. (I didn't spell his name right I know it, I have a UB about how goood my speling is too) regards--Orangesodakid 22:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

all right then, I'll look for it. regards--Orangesodakid 22:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

uhhh... what am I looking for?--Orangesodakid 22:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

the revew thing? thats cool (I don't notice things without a hint) How do I get one of those? regards--Orangesodakid 22:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for commenting on my review! Now, I demand clarification!

Hello, White Shadows. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Editor review/A little insignificant.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A little insignificant ^{Talk to me!} _{(I have candy!)} 01:17, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Undoing removal of warnings

Just a heads up in relation to User talk:70.160.127.184: per WP:UP#CMT, users are perfectly entitled to remove warnings from their own pages. Thank you! ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Rollback permission granted

Administrators have the authority to grant the rollback permission on their own assessment without conducting a formal permission request. I've looked your record over and decided to grant you the permission.

However, abuse rollback and it will not only get revoked, it will make reobtaining the permission FAR more difficult down the track. Consider yourself advised :)

Regards Manning (talk) 23:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Remember to take routine block requests to AIV. If things are REALLY out of control and you need urgent intervention, it is usually OK to take it to AN/I, but highlight the urgency of the matter. Be good and good luck. Manning (talk) 00:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations cp NotedGrant Talk 02:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Give everybody a treat... Milk and cookies should do fine :) Rkr1991 ^{(Wanna chat?)} 15:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Well done. Congratulations. You deserve them. And good decision Manning, I don't think you'll regret it (highlight my message, heeheeheee!), Lord Spongefrog (review) (I am Czar of all Russias!) 15:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Yay!--Coldplay Expert 17:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Where's my milk --NotedGrant Talk 18:48, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Im too lazy to go to my fridge, get my milk and give it to you. Sorry!--Coldplay Expert 19:11, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Notedgrant has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Barn

		The Angel Heart Barnstar
		For being a good human

--NotedGrant Talk 19:34, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Yay!--Coldplay Expert 20:37, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Rollback on my user page.

This was an inappropriate use of rollback. Please do not do it again. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:27, 12 October 2009 (UTC) Sorry about that, I messed up wont happen again.--Coldplay Expert 00:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

You had rollback for 2 days and you alredy screwed it up.(lol) but really, congrats. regards.--Orangesodakid 15:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Two amazing discoveries

1) If you write a really long comment, or think you're going to be edit conflictificated, copy-paste the text before clicking save! (of course, you don't paste just yet) Then if you can't save properly, all you have to do is edit again and paste the text.

2) When editing Wikipedia, you can click save to let other see your changes!

3) Citizendium has a very accurate, unbiased, article, on our very own U.S. President, Barack Obama (I'm joking here), Lord Spongefrog (review) (I am Czar of all Russias!) 16:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm so sorry! I stole that Citizentium crack from an admin at ANI! Lord Spongefrog (review) (I am Czar of all Russias!) 16:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

little missgudied wikiuser

Poor NoR, he is going to get blocked again:( he would have been a good contributer to the enciclipedia, if he wasent to extreem.--Orangesodakid 22:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Shhh...

I don't know!!--NemesisofReason 17:44, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

little misgudied wikiuser

Poor NoR, he is going to get blocked again:( he would have been a good contributer to the enciclipedia, if he wasent to extreem. (I know things are spelled wrong in this, I know it)--Orangesodakid 22:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

K, talk to me when you get a chance, we need to help NoR. regards--Orangesodakid 22:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm worred that he is going to get blocked forever because he dosen't respond. I think that we should help him befor he gets blocked (again). regards--Orangesodakid 22:43, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, White Shadows. You have new messages at Orangesodakid's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

well, I'm too lazy to stay on any longer, by. regards--Orangesodakid 23:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Service Award

Hey, just wanted to ask you if you could give me the lowest service award. thank you --NemesisofReason 13:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

talkback

Hello, White Shadows. You have new messages at Orangesodakid's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your editor review

Hi Coldplay. :) I haven't forgotten about the promise I made to give you a few comments at your editor review. I've been busy both on-wiki with various things as well as in real life. Rest assured, I will get to it as soon as I can. :) If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a message. Warmly, –Katerenka (talk) 06:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: Admin

I have, but it didn't go so well. Right now I'm focusing on other tasks, and going for a second Rfa is far from my mind, so. I won't lie to ya and say 'No, I don't want to be an admin.', I mean I'd like to; I wouldn't mind doing it a second time, but right now, not so much. Maybe later in the future. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Alright then, Im shocked that you failed in your RFA. Oh well...im sure that the next time you try you will make it. Well I guess thats it, just think about it for a while. Good luck on any future attempts at adminship. You got my vote.--Coldplay Expert 23:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hey whats up?--74.103.62.49 (talk) 23:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Huggle

Hi there. I just noticed that you acquired rollback. After getting used to using the tool, I would suggest trying out a program called Huggle, which is an antivandalism tool. You can read up on it via the link I provided. If you wish to use it, you should know that it is quite powerful, so you need to be careful with it, especially when first using it. Cheers. Until It Sleeps ^{Talk • Contribs} 00:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, as I said, be very careful with it at first. See you around. Until It Sleeps ^{Talk • Contribs} 00:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Poke

Hey, just thought I'd drop by and say hi! I've been seeing your edits in Huggle. Netalarmtalk 01:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Someone blocked me for vandalism (by accident) but then unblocked me a minute later because they didnt mean to. However Im still blocked! why? And ps, the huggle thing is doing great!--Coldplay Expert 01:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll be having Friday Fish Fry tonight instead... MuZemike 01:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Im still blocked! help!--Coldplay Expert 01:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC) Its my IP address! Can someone please unblock it?--Coldplay Expert 01:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied, we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details, there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.

   Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.

   If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.

2. Try to edit the Sandbox.

   If you are able to edit the sandbox, you are not blocked from editing. Either the autoblock on your IP address has already expired, or you weren't blocked in the first place. Either way, you can resume editing.

3. If you are still blocked, follow the directions below:
   1. Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "Unblock request" section.
   2. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page, and click save.

      If you cannot edit your own talk page, use the Unblock Ticket Request System to make your request.

Thanks, –Katerenka (talk) 01:56, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

No im still blocked and I didnt even do anything! It was a mistake. You see I reprted a user and MuZemike blocked ME by accident so He unblocked me but my IP address is still blocked. Kat, can you tell an admin to unblock me plz?--Coldplay Expert 01:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I understand that it was a mistake but without providing the information requested in the template (point 3), an admin cannot find your autoblock in the log. –Katerenka (talk) 02:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

OK ill fix it in a sec.--Coldplay Expert 02:03, 15 October 2009 (UTC) {{71.62.230.249|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Coldplay Expert". The reason given for Coldplay Expert's block is: "Vandalism".|MuZemike|1610315}}

Accidentally autoblocked again? Okay, I'm speechless.

		The "Getting Accidentally Blocked On A Regular Basis And Still Keeping A Positive Attitude" Barnstar
		Self-explanatory. Thanks for not giving up on us idiots of Wikipedia. XD A little insignificant Talk to me! (I have candy!) 14:38, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, White Shadows. You have new messages at Orangesodakid's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Be careful with Huggle, please.

At Diamond chess, you repeatedly reverted the blanking of the page, and then reported the user to AIV. Unfortunately, this blanking was done by the page's only substantial author, and was a clear request to delete the page. This is not vandalism - please watch out for this kind of thing. Thanks! ~ mazca ^talk 22:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem, as long as you keep an eye out! Huggle's powerful, just remember it isn't a race - make sure you're aware of the situation before you revert something. Keep up the good work, you've done some great anti-vandal work otherwise. :) ~ mazca ^talk 22:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Self-reconfiguring modular robotics edit

Resolved

 – deleted the tag

I was not sure if you would see my reply on my ip address talk page, so i have reposted here. And again, if you can actually see edits to the ip page, tell me and ill stop.

The factual acuracy of he information presented was disputed, while everything in the post is entirely rue and verifyable. The person who made these claims seems to have been worried that these robots would not self-reconfigure (modules disconnect from each other automitically using an AI system and then recoonec in a different order) bu in fact they do. Howver, only prototypes are un-marketed versions of these robot exis with this abiliy, for actualy useful robot in industry and otherwise this is not necessary, though the robot can sense broken modules and replce them itself with new onces, provided that modules are placed in an appropriate storage in a close proximity to the robot. His warning really sours the page, and this post was made in order for university students to which such robots have been donated by Robotics Design Inc. (the manufacturer) to reference their material. Futre posts will come, but i have decided against adding un-marketed protypes and toys to the page, so as to comply wih wikipeida's notability guidelines. I am more than willing to give the commenter the benefit of the doubt that he was legitiamately trying to improve the article, but he is wong, so since me erasing the warning seems to have stirred the hornets nest, I would like to ask for your help in its removal, if it isn't to much trouble. This talk page dissapears, so further communications to me can be done so at helloman911777@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.98.246 (talk) 22:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

The warning on the page that says the factual acuracy of the post in in question. It is an entirely factual post, an in an effort to better serve education and protect our patents, this article must be on this page, without a warning that it is a sham, which it is not. Basically do the same change i did.

Thanks alot for your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.98.246 (talk) 01:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

On Basilisk Station

Resolved

 – commented on user talk page. false positive of mine, opps. man I got to slow down or something!

Was it really necessary to revert those edits? I am of course flattered that you restored my version, but I saw nothing wrong with those smaal changes he made. Debresser (talk) 23:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

It's not a big deal. I just like to be carefull with newbies that try to make a good edit. Even if it wasn't much of an improvement. :) See you around, Debresser (talk) 23:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Huggle

I downloaded it. I did that subpage thing with the "enable". Now how to I access the "£$%^& thing!!!?? Lord Spongefrog (review) (I am Czar of all Russias!) 08:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Please see ANAT Robot Response

Please see "Response to: ANAT Robot, its author, Wikipedia community, and re. removal of the dispute" in the discussion section of "Self-Reconfiguring Modular Robotics." Thank you. 76.114.242.31 (talk) 08:57, 16 October 2009 (UTC)