Talk:Stephen Barrett: Difference between revisions
reverting Tyciol's edits of my comments - please see WP:Talk - don't edit other people's posts |
→Cracpot Steran Barrett: What you never knew! and must know! Tag: excessive whitespace |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::::Oh, now that *is* useful. Much better than trying to remember the syntax every time I want to search all subpages. I took out the ''Template:'' part as unnecessary (though not worth changing unless one is making an edit anyway. - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 17:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
::::Oh, now that *is* useful. Much better than trying to remember the syntax every time I want to search all subpages. I took out the ''Template:'' part as unnecessary (though not worth changing unless one is making an edit anyway. - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 17:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
:::::Thanks, 2/0. I keep forgetting that ''Template:'' is the default, therefore I don't have to specify it. When I was testing it in my own userspace, then I had to specify where the template was. But, yes, this sure makes it a lot easier, imo - especially for new editors who are not familiar with how to use the prefix part of the Wikipedia search. --[[User:Stmrlbs|<span style="color:#AF0AAB;background:#FFFFbb;font-family:Viner Hand ITC; margin-right:0;padding:2px 5px 1px">'''stmrlbs'''</span>]]|[[User_talk:Stmrlbs|<span style="color:#396400;background:#CCFFff;font-size:85%">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 03:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
:::::Thanks, 2/0. I keep forgetting that ''Template:'' is the default, therefore I don't have to specify it. When I was testing it in my own userspace, then I had to specify where the template was. But, yes, this sure makes it a lot easier, imo - especially for new editors who are not familiar with how to use the prefix part of the Wikipedia search. --[[User:Stmrlbs|<span style="color:#AF0AAB;background:#FFFFbb;font-family:Viner Hand ITC; margin-right:0;padding:2px 5px 1px">'''stmrlbs'''</span>]]|[[User_talk:Stmrlbs|<span style="color:#396400;background:#CCFFff;font-size:85%">'''''talk'''''</span>]] 03:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
===Racing horse versus Donkey=== |
|||
If you call the donkey a racing horse, than Stefan Barrett is a psychiatrist. |
|||
===Stefan Barrett the industry crackpot=== |
|||
'''It is the time to correct the article about Crackpot '''Stephen J. Barrett''' ! |
|||
The most reliable websites about that crackpot are by the real consumer watchdog Tim Bolen: |
|||
*[http://bolenreport.com Bolen Report] |
|||
*[http://www.quackpotwatch.org Quackpot Watch] |
|||
Delete all prayers about that con artist! |
|||
===Tell the truth=== |
|||
Crackpot, a well known American con and clown, is claiming to be retired [[United States|American]] in reality unlicensed or de-licensed [[psychiatrist]], [[author]], co-founder of the [[National Council Against Health Fraud]] (NCAHF), and the webmaster of [[Quackwatch]] |
|||
*[http://www.quackpotwatch.org Quackpot Watch] |
|||
http://bolenreport.com]"When it QUACKS like a DUCK, and walks like a DUCK, it is Stephen Barrett well known [[Quack]]! " |
|||
*[http://bolenreport.com Tim Bolen report] |
|||
===This article requires plenty of time to expose the con and quack Stefan Barrett and Ronald Gotts (also known as Ronald Gott) === |
|||
'''The Quackbuster Conspiracy - The crackpot you never new''' |
|||
James Carter's, MD's authoritative book "Racketeering In Medicine," published by Hampton Roads, carefully explains the "Quackbuster Conspiracy." |
|||
The "Quackbuster Conspiracy" was started shortly after the American Medical Association (AMA), the rquivalent of Doctors Labor Union, a non scientific professional organization with the sole purpose of promoting medical professions and careers and lobbying their priorities in [[Washington]], lost the court battle to the [[Chiropractor]]s in a case begun in Federal court in 1976. The Federal judge ordered the AMA's covert operation shut down - and leave the Chiropractors alone. The AMA files, library, etc., ended up in Stephen Barrett's 1,800 square foot basement in Allentown, PA. Barrett, and his minions, had the common sense to stay away from criticizing Chiropractors for quite some time, but never for ever. |
|||
Barrett, a pseudo-psychiatrists self-proclaimed "Consumer Advocate", is a well known mentor of all medical disinformation cases and many scams of specially chemical industry. |
|||
For years, Barrett has touted himself as a medical expert on ‘quackery’ in health care sector and has assisted in dozens of court cases as an alleged self proclaimed expert. He also was called upon by the FDA, FTC and other governmental agencies for his purported expertise. |
|||
He was the subject of many magazine interviews, including [[Time Magazine]] and featured on television interviews on [[ABC]]’s [[20/20]], [[NBC]]’s [[Today Show]][[ and [[PBS]]. |
|||
He has gained media fame by his outspoken vocal disgust and impatience over natural or [[alternative medicine]] as a valid health care alternative, including his criticisms of two time [[Nobel Prize]] winner [[Linus Pauling]]. |
|||
Barrett has also filed numerous lawsuits against attorney Negrete who in court exposed him, as well as many practitioners including Dr. [[Hulda Clark]] the uthor of [[The Cure for All Diseases and The Cure for All Cancers]], in San Diego, California federal court. |
|||
Stephan Barrett is also an ex associate of another previously exposed in court an insurance industry fraud master abusing a title of Doctor [[Ronald Gotts]]. Gotts became famous for , selling fraudulent medial reports he never read with his mass produced signature and stamp of his signature. Those reports as exposed on [[Date line]] [[NBC]], were written by journalists, students, and house wives using specially developed computer "templates" by insurance industry with the purpose to defraud claimants.<br> |
|||
'''Stephen Barrett a con claiming to be psychiatrist''' |
|||
Court Case: Stephen Barrett, M.D. vs. Tedd Koren, D.C. and Koren Publications, Inc. |
|||
Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County for the State of Pennsylvania |
|||
Court Case No.: 2002-C-1837 |
|||
Contact: Carlos F. Negrete |
|||
LAW OFFICES OF CARLOS F. NEGRETE |
|||
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 |
|||
Phone: 949.493.8115 |
|||
Fax: 949.493.8170 |
|||
email: mediarelations@healthfreedomlaw.com |
|||
mediarelations@negretelaw.com |
|||
http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com |
|||
http://www.negretelaw.com |
|||
Dr. Tedd Koren, DC. |
|||
Phone: 800.537.3001 |
|||
267.498.0071 Fax: 267.498.0078 |
|||
http://www.korenpublications.com |
|||
The trial started on Monday, October 10, 2005 and ended on October 13, 2005 Barrett was represented by local Allentown attorney, Richard Orloski. In a stunning development, [[Lehigh Valley]] [[Pennsylvania]] Judge J. Brian Johnson on Thursday, October 13, 2005, tossed out nationally known self-proclaimed '''consumer medical advocate''' Stephen Barrett’s defamation lawsuit just minutes before it was going to be considered by a local jury. |
|||
At that trial, under a heated cross-examination by Negrete, '''Barrett was forced and conced that he was not a Medical Board Certified psychiatrist because he had failed the certification exam.''' |
|||
During the course of his examination, Barrett also had to concede his ties to the AMA, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food & Drug Administration (FDA). |
|||
Founded by a nonprofit donations from political chemical lobbyist with the help of INSURANCE INDUSTRY, that con became "expert Witness" in many court cases, where he sold fraudulent medical opinions for fees. |
|||
Barrett was exposed in many cases in court as a mental case of disbarred allegedly psychiatrist, and greedy con who knowingly and consciously selling for profit fraudulent medical opinions injured many people in his carrier. |
|||
*[http://www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html Dr. Stephen Barrett of Quackwatch Exposed In Court Cases] |
|||
He runs a number of websites dealing with alleged medical [[quackery]] and health [[fraud]]. Impersonating Consumer Advocate as the foundation for his tax exempt status he allegedly focuses on [[consumer protection]], [[medical ethics]], and [[scientific skepticism]]. |
|||
Allegedly numerous sources have cited Quackwatch as a useful source for online consumer information.<ref name=nettie/><!-- A long list is already referenced in the body of the article. This is the LEAD where things are abbreviated. --> |
|||
== Biography of the con master== |
|||
Barrett was in 1957 attendant who claim to graduate of the [[Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons]] and allegedly completed his psychiatry [[residency (medicine)|residency]] in 1961. In 1967 and 1968 he followed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at [[La Salle Extension University]] (Chicago). |
|||
In addition to [[webmaster]]ing his websites, Barrett is a co-founder, vice-president and a board member of the [[National Council Against Health Fraud]] (NCAHF). He is an advisor to the [[American Council on Science and Health]], and a Fellow of the [[Committee for Skeptical Inquiry]] (CSI). From 1987 through 1989, he taught health education at [[Pennsylvania State University]]. |
|||
Barrett is the editor of his Prometheus Books. |
|||
Barrett has received a number of awards from lobbyists in recognition for his fraudulent activities as a [[consumer protection]] work against quackery. [[Quackwatch]] received the award of ''Best Physician-Authored Site'' by MD NetGuide, May 2003. |
|||
<blockquote>"probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud."<ref name="Spiked_Online"/></blockquote> |
|||
== Consumer dis-information == |
|||
{{main|Quackwatch}} |
|||
The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform of disinformation describing and exposing what he and other insurance industry contributors would like to consider to be quackery and as alleged health fraud.<ref name="quacks"> |
|||
{{cite news |
|||
|first=Fred D |
|||
|last=Baldwin |
|||
|url=http://www.medhunters.com/articles/ifItQuacksLikeADuck.html |
|||
|title=If It Quacks Like a Duck ... |
|||
|accessdate=2007-09-16 |
|||
|publisher=MedHunters}}</ref> The website is part of Quackwatch, Inc., a [[Non-profit organization|nonprofit corporation]] that raudulently claims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." |
|||
> |
|||
Barrett has become a "lightning rod" based on medical fraud for alleged controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside [his] scope."<ref name="jaroff"/><ref name="Ladd">[http://www.villagevoice.com/1999-06-22/news/doctor-who/ ''Dr. Who? Diagnosing Medical Fraud May Require a Second Opinion''.] by Donna Ladd, [[The Village Voice]], June 23 - 29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006</ref> He states he does not give [[Equal-time rule|equal time]] to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects." |
|||
Barrett fraudulently as always, claim to be strong supporter of the [[Health On the Net Foundation|HONcode]] and he allegedly has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it. In a whole "Special to the ''[[Washington Post]]''", extensive coverage of his views on the subject were provided, including his scams, fraudulent opinions and criticisms of many named abusers.<ref name=Wanjek> Christopher Wanjek. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25556-2004Apr19.html Attacking Their HONor: Some Dispute Value of Logo Used to Verify Accuracy, Integrity Of Health Web Site Contents.] Special to ''[[The Washington Post]]'', April 20, 2004; Page HE01</ref> |
|||
A large number of practitioners and specially supporters of [[alternative medicine]] charge Barrett and Quackwatch with plain fraud for it's support of chemical industry as the main source of funding his fraudulent claims of "Advocacy to Consumers" with the sole purpose to destroy the confidence in a right choice of alternative medicine.<ref name="Ladd"/><ref name="Evaluating_CAM">Hufford DJ. David J Hufford, "Symposium article: Evaluating Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Limits of Science and Scientists." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 198-212. Hufford's symposium presentation was the counterpoint for another doctor's presentation, which argued that "alternative medicine" is not medicine at all. See Lawrence J. Schneiderman, "Symposium article: The (Alternative) Medicalization of Life." J Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31 (2003): 191-198. |
|||
Some insurance industry sources that mention Stephen Barrett's ''Quackwatch'' as a useful source for consumer information include website reviews,<ref name="The Good Web Guide">{{cite news |
|||
== Selected publications == |
|||
A partial list of disinformation articles Barrett was one of the authors or his authored work was cited include: |
|||
* In 1985, Barrett was the author of the ''Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?'' article in the [[Journal of the American Medical Association]] that exposed commercial laboratories performing multimineral [[Hair analysis (alternative medicine)|hair analysis]]. He concluded that ''"commercial use of hair analysis in this manner is unscientific, economically wasteful, and probably illegal."''<ref name="hairanalysis">Barrett SJ (August 23, 1985). [http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/254/8/1041?view=abstract Commercial hair analysis. Science or scam?] ''[[Journal of the American Medical Association|JAMA]]'' Vol. 254 No. 8.</ref> His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."<ref name="Seidel">[http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/285/1/67 ''Assessment of Commercial Laboratories Performing Hair Mineral Analysis''], Seidel S, et al. , ''[[Journal of the American Medical Association|JAMA]]''. 2001;285:67-72.</ref> |
|||
===Scams attacks orchestrated by Crackpot Stefan Barrett:=== |
|||
*''Consumer Health: A Guide to Intelligent Decisions'' - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, Kroger M, London WM (2006). (textbook, 8th ed.) McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-248521-3 |
|||
*''Dubious Cancer Treatment'' - Barrett SJ & Cassileth BR, editors (2001). Florida Division of the [[American Cancer Society]] |
|||
*''The Health Robbers: A Close Look at Quackery in America'' - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, eds. (1993). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-855-4 |
|||
*''Health Schemes, Scams, and Frauds'' - Barrett SJ (1991). Consumer Reports Books, ISBN 0-89043-330-5 |
|||
*''Reader's Guide to Alternative Health Methods'' - by Zwicky JF, Hafner AW, Barrett S, Jarvis WT (1993). [[American Medical Association]], ISBN 0-89970-525-1 |
|||
*''The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods'' - Barrett SJ, Herbert V (1991). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-909-7 |
|||
*''Vitamins and Minerals: Help or Harm?'' - Marshall CW (1983). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ISBN 0-397-53060-9 (edited by Barrett, won the [[American Medical Writers Association]] award for best book of 1983 for the general public, republished by [[Consumer Reports|Consumer Reports Books]]). |
|||
Collections of articles: |
|||
* ''Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis'', 2007, edited by Bryan Farha, [[University Press of America]], ISBN 978-0-7618-3772-5. Three of the eighteen chapters are written by Barrett. |
|||
== See also == |
|||
* [[Ronald Gotts]] |
|||
* [[Alternative medicine]] |
|||
* [[Burden of Proof]] |
|||
* [[Consumer protection]] |
|||
* [[Debunker]] |
|||
* [[Slander and libel|Defamation]] |
|||
* [[Evidence-based medicine]] |
|||
* [[National Council Against Health Fraud]] |
|||
* [[Pseudoscience]] |
|||
== External links == |
|||
* [http://www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html Dr. Stephen Barrett of Quackwatch Exposed In Court Cases] |
|||
* [http://bolenreport.com American journalist]] Tim Bolen Report |
|||
* [http://www.quackpotwatch.org Quackpot] |
|||
==J== |
==J== |
Revision as of 09:45, 24 October 2009
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Stephen Barrett. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Stephen Barrett at the Reference desk. |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
|
||||||||||||||||
added a search box for the talk page and the archives
since there are so many archives, and since new editors are told to check past discussions, I thought a search box would make it much easier to do so. --stmrlbs|talk 01:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- The archives are mostly nonsense and I don't see any new editors who are having problems with searching the archives. QuackGuru (talk) 01:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I just tried out the search box; it seems to work properly and and be quite helpful - why would we remove such functionality? --CliffC (talk) 03:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I fixed the template so that it works for topics with multiple word names (like "Stephen Barrett"). It is very easy to add, and it sure makes it easier to check on past discussions. --stmrlbs|talk 05:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, now that *is* useful. Much better than trying to remember the syntax every time I want to search all subpages. I took out the Template: part as unnecessary (though not worth changing unless one is making an edit anyway. - 2/0 (cont.) 17:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, 2/0. I keep forgetting that Template: is the default, therefore I don't have to specify it. When I was testing it in my own userspace, then I had to specify where the template was. But, yes, this sure makes it a lot easier, imo - especially for new editors who are not familiar with how to use the prefix part of the Wikipedia search. --stmrlbs|talk 03:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, now that *is* useful. Much better than trying to remember the syntax every time I want to search all subpages. I took out the Template: part as unnecessary (though not worth changing unless one is making an edit anyway. - 2/0 (cont.) 17:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I fixed the template so that it works for topics with multiple word names (like "Stephen Barrett"). It is very easy to add, and it sure makes it easier to check on past discussions. --stmrlbs|talk 05:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I just tried out the search box; it seems to work properly and and be quite helpful - why would we remove such functionality? --CliffC (talk) 03:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Racing horse versus Donkey
If you call the donkey a racing horse, than Stefan Barrett is a psychiatrist.
Stefan Barrett the industry crackpot
It is the time to correct the article about Crackpot Stephen J. Barrett ! The most reliable websites about that crackpot are by the real consumer watchdog Tim Bolen:
Delete all prayers about that con artist!
Tell the truth
Crackpot, a well known American con and clown, is claiming to be retired American in reality unlicensed or de-licensed psychiatrist, author, co-founder of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF), and the webmaster of Quackwatch
http://bolenreport.com]"When it QUACKS like a DUCK, and walks like a DUCK, it is Stephen Barrett well known Quack! "
This article requires plenty of time to expose the con and quack Stefan Barrett and Ronald Gotts (also known as Ronald Gott)
The Quackbuster Conspiracy - The crackpot you never new James Carter's, MD's authoritative book "Racketeering In Medicine," published by Hampton Roads, carefully explains the "Quackbuster Conspiracy." The "Quackbuster Conspiracy" was started shortly after the American Medical Association (AMA), the rquivalent of Doctors Labor Union, a non scientific professional organization with the sole purpose of promoting medical professions and careers and lobbying their priorities in Washington, lost the court battle to the Chiropractors in a case begun in Federal court in 1976. The Federal judge ordered the AMA's covert operation shut down - and leave the Chiropractors alone. The AMA files, library, etc., ended up in Stephen Barrett's 1,800 square foot basement in Allentown, PA. Barrett, and his minions, had the common sense to stay away from criticizing Chiropractors for quite some time, but never for ever.
Barrett, a pseudo-psychiatrists self-proclaimed "Consumer Advocate", is a well known mentor of all medical disinformation cases and many scams of specially chemical industry. For years, Barrett has touted himself as a medical expert on ‘quackery’ in health care sector and has assisted in dozens of court cases as an alleged self proclaimed expert. He also was called upon by the FDA, FTC and other governmental agencies for his purported expertise. He was the subject of many magazine interviews, including Time Magazine and featured on television interviews on ABC’s 20/20, NBC’s Today Show[[ and PBS.
He has gained media fame by his outspoken vocal disgust and impatience over natural or alternative medicine as a valid health care alternative, including his criticisms of two time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling.
Barrett has also filed numerous lawsuits against attorney Negrete who in court exposed him, as well as many practitioners including Dr. Hulda Clark the uthor of The Cure for All Diseases and The Cure for All Cancers, in San Diego, California federal court.
Stephan Barrett is also an ex associate of another previously exposed in court an insurance industry fraud master abusing a title of Doctor Ronald Gotts. Gotts became famous for , selling fraudulent medial reports he never read with his mass produced signature and stamp of his signature. Those reports as exposed on Date line NBC, were written by journalists, students, and house wives using specially developed computer "templates" by insurance industry with the purpose to defraud claimants.
Stephen Barrett a con claiming to be psychiatrist Court Case: Stephen Barrett, M.D. vs. Tedd Koren, D.C. and Koren Publications, Inc. Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County for the State of Pennsylvania Court Case No.: 2002-C-1837 Contact: Carlos F. Negrete LAW OFFICES OF CARLOS F. NEGRETE San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Phone: 949.493.8115 Fax: 949.493.8170 email: mediarelations@healthfreedomlaw.com mediarelations@negretelaw.com http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com http://www.negretelaw.com
Dr. Tedd Koren, DC. Phone: 800.537.3001 267.498.0071 Fax: 267.498.0078 http://www.korenpublications.com
The trial started on Monday, October 10, 2005 and ended on October 13, 2005 Barrett was represented by local Allentown attorney, Richard Orloski. In a stunning development, Lehigh Valley Pennsylvania Judge J. Brian Johnson on Thursday, October 13, 2005, tossed out nationally known self-proclaimed consumer medical advocate Stephen Barrett’s defamation lawsuit just minutes before it was going to be considered by a local jury.
At that trial, under a heated cross-examination by Negrete, Barrett was forced and conced that he was not a Medical Board Certified psychiatrist because he had failed the certification exam. During the course of his examination, Barrett also had to concede his ties to the AMA, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Food & Drug Administration (FDA).
Founded by a nonprofit donations from political chemical lobbyist with the help of INSURANCE INDUSTRY, that con became "expert Witness" in many court cases, where he sold fraudulent medical opinions for fees. Barrett was exposed in many cases in court as a mental case of disbarred allegedly psychiatrist, and greedy con who knowingly and consciously selling for profit fraudulent medical opinions injured many people in his carrier.
He runs a number of websites dealing with alleged medical quackery and health fraud. Impersonating Consumer Advocate as the foundation for his tax exempt status he allegedly focuses on consumer protection, medical ethics, and scientific skepticism.
Allegedly numerous sources have cited Quackwatch as a useful source for online consumer information.[1]
Biography of the con master
Barrett was in 1957 attendant who claim to graduate of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and allegedly completed his psychiatry residency in 1961. In 1967 and 1968 he followed part of a correspondence course in American Law and Procedure at La Salle Extension University (Chicago).
In addition to webmastering his websites, Barrett is a co-founder, vice-president and a board member of the National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF). He is an advisor to the American Council on Science and Health, and a Fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI). From 1987 through 1989, he taught health education at Pennsylvania State University.
Barrett is the editor of his Prometheus Books.
Barrett has received a number of awards from lobbyists in recognition for his fraudulent activities as a consumer protection work against quackery. Quackwatch received the award of Best Physician-Authored Site by MD NetGuide, May 2003.
"probably began when I took a college course in medical statistics, and learned what makes the difference between scientific thought and poor reasoning. Medical school brought me in touch with the rapid and amazing strides being made in the understanding and treatment of disease. My anti-quackery activities have intensified my interest and concern in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, quackery and fraud."[2]
Consumer dis-information
The Quackwatch website is Barrett's main platform of disinformation describing and exposing what he and other insurance industry contributors would like to consider to be quackery and as alleged health fraud.[3] The website is part of Quackwatch, Inc., a nonprofit corporation that raudulently claims to "combat health-related frauds, myths, fads, fallacies, and misconduct." >
Barrett has become a "lightning rod" based on medical fraud for alleged controversy as a result of his criticisms of alternative medicine theories and practitioners. Barrett says he does not criticize conventional medicine because that would be "way outside [his] scope."[4][5] He states he does not give equal time to some subjects, and has written on his web site that "Quackery and fraud don't involve legitimate controversy and are not balanced subjects. I don't believe it is helpful to publish 'balanced' articles about unbalanced subjects."
Barrett fraudulently as always, claim to be strong supporter of the HONcode and he allegedly has made efforts to improve compliance with its rules and to expose those who abuse it. In a whole "Special to the Washington Post", extensive coverage of his views on the subject were provided, including his scams, fraudulent opinions and criticisms of many named abusers.[6]
A large number of practitioners and specially supporters of alternative medicine charge Barrett and Quackwatch with plain fraud for it's support of chemical industry as the main source of funding his fraudulent claims of "Advocacy to Consumers" with the sole purpose to destroy the confidence in a right choice of alternative medicine.[5]Cite error: A <ref>
tag is missing the closing </ref>
(see the help page). His report has been cited in later articles, including one which concluded that such testing was "unreliable."[7]
Scams attacks orchestrated by Crackpot Stefan Barrett:
- Consumer Health: A Guide to Intelligent Decisions - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, Kroger M, London WM (2006). (textbook, 8th ed.) McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-248521-3
- Dubious Cancer Treatment - Barrett SJ & Cassileth BR, editors (2001). Florida Division of the American Cancer Society
- The Health Robbers: A Close Look at Quackery in America - Barrett SJ, Jarvis WT, eds. (1993). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-855-4
- Health Schemes, Scams, and Frauds - Barrett SJ (1991). Consumer Reports Books, ISBN 0-89043-330-5
- Reader's Guide to Alternative Health Methods - by Zwicky JF, Hafner AW, Barrett S, Jarvis WT (1993). American Medical Association, ISBN 0-89970-525-1
- The Vitamin Pushers: How the "Health Food" Industry Is Selling America a Bill of Goods - Barrett SJ, Herbert V (1991). Prometheus Books, ISBN 0-87975-909-7
- Vitamins and Minerals: Help or Harm? - Marshall CW (1983). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ISBN 0-397-53060-9 (edited by Barrett, won the American Medical Writers Association award for best book of 1983 for the general public, republished by Consumer Reports Books).
Collections of articles:
- Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis, 2007, edited by Bryan Farha, University Press of America, ISBN 978-0-7618-3772-5. Three of the eighteen chapters are written by Barrett.
See also
- Ronald Gotts
- Alternative medicine
- Burden of Proof
- Consumer protection
- Debunker
- Defamation
- Evidence-based medicine
- National Council Against Health Fraud
- Pseudoscience
External links
- Dr. Stephen Barrett of Quackwatch Exposed In Court Cases
- American journalist] Tim Bolen Report
- Quackpot
J
Does anyone know the source of this middle initial? It's not listed on his Quackwatch bio, can we put the reference next to the initial? Whatever source it came from, maybe it has the full middle name? Tyciol (talk) 21:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
nettie
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Spiked_Online
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Baldwin, Fred D. "If It Quacks Like a Duck ..." MedHunters. Retrieved 2007-09-16.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
jaroff
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b Dr. Who? Diagnosing Medical Fraud May Require a Second Opinion. by Donna Ladd, The Village Voice, June 23 - 29, 1999. Retrieved September 2, 2006
- ^ Christopher Wanjek. Attacking Their HONor: Some Dispute Value of Logo Used to Verify Accuracy, Integrity Of Health Web Site Contents. Special to The Washington Post, April 20, 2004; Page HE01
- ^ Assessment of Commercial Laboratories Performing Hair Mineral Analysis, Seidel S, et al. , JAMA. 2001;285:67-72.
- Biography articles of living people
- B-Class biography articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- Old requests for Biography peer review
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Skepticism articles
- Unknown-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- Articles with connected contributors