User talk:Kuyabribri

"This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:MuffledThud. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing" HAHAHAHA!!!! PLEASE TELL ME WHERE TO DELETE MY ACCOUNT AND I´LL DO THAT IN A SECOND! THAT IS THE AMOUNT OF FEAR I GET FROM YOUR "WARNING" :)

YOU REALLY THINK YOU HAVE THE POWER HERE DUMBASS? IT´S US UNKNOWN USERS WHO HOLD THE POWER, FOR WE CAN CREATE A NEW USER IN AN SECOND, WHEREAS YOU IDIOTS ARE STUCK WITH THE SAME ONE THAT WE CAN ALWAYS RIP AND MAKE FUN US!

GO GET A WOMAN LOSER!

Please click here to leave me a new message.

MLB All-Star Game

According to this advertisement-heavy article taken from the Kansas City Star (that's what it are), the 2012 game will indeed be in K.C.[1] →Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 07:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not going to complain if the KC info gets re-added if this article is cited. The only cite I saw on Major League Baseball All-Star Game venues for the KC cause was a dead link, and the one on the Mets had a misleading title and was mostly speculative. KuyaBriBri^Talk 07:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Obviously they need proper sourcing, by someone who cares enough. Reporting who's going to host a future event is kind of risky anyway. If the Royals don't play better, for all we know they might have moved to Montreal by then. →Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 08:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

2009 World Series

Hey, I see lots of recent edits by you. Want to work on this with me (for an eventual FAC)? Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Not sure how much time I can devote to this, but as always I will contribute when and where I can. KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

2009 American League Championship Series

I edited the ALCS page yesterday because the box score at the bottom showing totals was inaccurate. You edited it back. Why? The 4th inning for NYY doesn't add to 10 runs, and the total runs by NYY should be 33...not 35. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.244.91.130 (talk) 19:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

I erred on that one and have corrected it; however, your subsequent edit was still vandalism and I stand behind that revert. KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

2009 ALDS edits

Whoever keeps changing the line referring to the blown call by Phil Cuzzi that cost the Twins a run in Game 2 of this year's ALDS--you're wrong with your comments. When someone should have been at second (as Mauer should have been on his double that was called foul) but is only at first (from the hit he got later in the a-bat that only continued because of that missed call), and that missed call is followed by two further hits, it is not "speculation" to say that the missed call cost a team a run. There is no possible way for someone to be on second and fail to score despite two subsequent hits before an out is recorded. The two subsequent Twins hits absolutely made the missed call DIRECTLY cost the Twins a run, there's nothing "speculative" about that. It would be "speculative" to say that the call cost the Twins the entire game, because we don't know if Mijares would have pitched the bottom of the inning if the Twins had been in the lead and what would have happened with someone else on the mound. But there is no legitimate doubt or "speculation" that the missed call cost the Twins AT LEAST one run--and you could speculate that it cost them even more than that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.240.184.20 (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Responded at Talk:2009 American League Division Series. KuyaBriBri^Talk 04:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Living Christmas Tree

Thank you so much for your feedback on this page. Do you have any other suggestions? This page is meant to clarify what living christmas trees are (this year's emerging tree trend), not to sell anything. Thanks so so much! Serena Living Christmas Tree (talk) 22:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Jefferson Community School

I agree that notability favors a high school, but a high school with 25 students? That seems to be a stretch of an otherwise-reasonable guideline. Also, is deleting a speedy template a valid way to contest a speedy? Shouldn't that be done with {{hangon}}? --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 20:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Per WP:CSD, an editor who is not the creator of the page may remove a CSD template; only the article creator is required to use {{hangon}}. I've stubbed the article, as the same policy identifies stubbing as a viable alternative to speedy deletion. My goal was to strip out all the advertising and copyright violation material and leave a foundation from which some decent-quality article could be written. If you still question the subject's notability, be my guest and nominate it at AfD. I really have no argument in support of keeping the article beyond my belief that it should not be deleted without a discussion. KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, after reviewing common education-related AfD outcomes, it looks like consensus would be to keep it. Nothing to do now but make it better! Cheers! --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 20:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Where are you getting your enrollment number? I can't find that anywhere on the official webpage or [the local newspaper. --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 21:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Student enrollment came from the originator's figure (i.e., unreferenced). KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Going to revise it with a citation. KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

The local paper has a few references to the school, but they're only in the context of the facility being used for various conferences or activities, none that are actually covering the school itself. I even checked the Seattle PI and [2], but nothing. I'm pretty new at citing/sourcing (I've mostly been RCPing), so I don't know if I'm looking at the right places or not, but I don't know if we're going to find any good teriary sources. --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 21:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Middlewich High School Vandalism

Could you explain what my vandalism was please. i was trying to add the deputy head boy and girl top the infobox but it wouldn't work correctly and only added the deputy head boy and removed the outstanding achievement award. I then reverted it to a point that was after I changed grammatical errors and obscene language (real vandalism).

Please don't tarnish me with vandalism when I corrected it myself - it was pointless.

Aventura54

P.S. Sorry if I sound annoyed, its because I am but would like a civil discussion with you about this issue. Do you know anything about Middlewich High School other than what is on wikipedia and the Middlewich High School Website? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aventura54 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Note your last edit to the page, which undid a vandalism revert: [3]. If it was not your intention to replace the multiple instances of "wank" and variations thereof please let me know. KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:22, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Kuyabribri. You have new messages at Aventura54's talk page.
Message added 10:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you very much Kuyabribri. I have taken your point on board and note the biographical entries information. With this information to hand I am going to remove the last 3 entries on the infobox as all three people are under 18, which as on the page you linked to I read as "shouldn't be there" basically which does make a lot of sense.

None of my edits were intended to vandalise, disrupt or go against wikipedia policy and neither were my comments on your talk page about this issue, I just wanted some explanations as I didn't understand at the time.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aventura54 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Cal Trans Pet Cemetary

• I am a new editor. Please give me guidance. I am still writing the article, gathering more sources from the past 15 years of history on this pollution example.

• The "Cal Trans Pet Cemetery" received international news coverage in 2007, and is no longer news, but 'history.

• In 2003, the president of the the Association of Engineering Geologists as the single biggest example of "junk science" in the courts by its former presdident.

• "Cal Trans Pet Cemetery" is the name given to any government pollution scandal, based on the severity of the pollution problem.

• Cal Trans Pet Cemetary is cited at hearings before Boards of Supervisors around the country.

• Perhaps the entire article should be moved to the Cal Trans article, but compared to Cal Trans itself, it is small, but for major government pollution scandals, it is big. Please let me know what you think is best. I think it should be a small section in Cal Trans, and a big one in its own article.

Thank you . HkFnsNGA (talk) 17:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Barrington Plaza

I will not contest your deletion, so I deleted the article. You were correct that I was very sloppy, beneath the standards of Wikipedia, for example, saying HUD when I shuold have said FHA. HkFnsNGA (talk) 18:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

As a matter of semantics, neither you nor I have the authority or ability to delete an article. Only adminstrators may do so. However, according to the deletion policy, if the author and only contributor of content blanks the article or explicitly requests deletion, as you have done, it may be tagged for speedy deletion and deleted by an admin without further discussion. I tagged the article for speedy deletion accordingly, and it looks like it has already been deleted. KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Barrington Plaza

I recreated the article with two NYT sources. I suspect this development is notable, but the interesting stuff happened in the 1960s and 1970s so it's not easily seen from a Google search. Feel free to review my work... I'll probably add more later, but I'm not going to be around for the next few hours. --Sancho Mandoval (talk) 19:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Shaikh

Hi. Back in June, you !voted on this to AfD as Muhammad Shaikh. It has reappeared under a new name and was tagged G4; both Schuminweb and I declined the G4 on the grounds that it was substantially different; he changed his mind and deleted it; I also changed my mind but have now changed it back and decided that the best course is to restore it, bring it back to AfD for another look, and notify everyone concerned in the first AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Louis Lesser

Is the basis for your deletion nomination still that Louis Lesser is a "hoax"? If not, I do not know what it is I need to respond to. Does your nomination for deletion mean you voted to delete, or just that you want others to examine things, then you will vote after discussion? HkFnsNGA (talk) 21:04, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Going to try and address your questions in order:

1. The basis for my deletion nomination was that Mr. Lesser is a hoax. That does not mean that Mr. Lesser does not exist—you clearly proved to me that he does—but that the claims made about him and his accomplishments were unsubstantiated. It appears you removed such claims, and I removed the hoax tag from the article ([4]). I will shortly be posting a comment to that AfD redacting the hoax claim, but I would still question whether the subject qualifies under WP:N. Please respond to my comments there and not on my talk page.
2. Unless otherwise stated, nominating an article for deletion means that the nominator wishes the article to be deleted. I will change my position to neutral, but since there are so many outstanding delete !votes, the AfD cannot be closed until the 7-day discussion period lapses.

As for some of your other behavior,

• DO NOT DELETE your own comments from talk pages. This is a major breach of WP:Etiquette. If you need to withdraw or redact your own comment, please use strikethrough by surrounding the text with <s> and </s>. I'm going to ignore it this time, but please don't test my patience.
• I have not explicitly requested that you not comment on my talk page. You are welcome to comment here as long as you remain civil, refrain from personal attacks, and follow the guidelines in the boxes at the top. Just remember that I reserve the right to ignore and/or outright delete your comment. I do prefer to keep discussions in one place, which is why I have not responded to any of your comments here.

KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Water Cure (torture) - Wikipedia article mirrored on another site

Fyi, regarding the auotomated copyright violation tag by CorenSearchBot. The bot found a Wikipedia mirror site, that led straight back to the Wikipedia article I was working on. This was noted by KuyaBriBri^Talk, who removed the tag. RegardsWotnow (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Wotnow

Silly me. The message above was meant to go on the bot maintainer's page. I then came to your page to thank you for your prompt action, only to find my message here. D'oh! Sorry about that, and consider yourself thanked.Wotnow (talk) 00:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Wotnow

LAA

Hey Kuyabribri

I got Good News for you, and I got Bad News for you.

First the Good News. The Angels will not be referred to as the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim for much longer.

The Bad news is when they change their name again, it will likely be changed to... "LOS ANGELS DE MEXICO CITY"

I've been living near Anaheim since 1985. As a fan of the Angels, and my Home Town Bronx Bombers. I knew when MORON"O" bought the team, that was his intent. The name change was just to test how flexible, the lease, and the MLB were. MORON"O" has made it clear that he doesn't like Anaheim, and he doesn't like the stadium. Given the name change there is no way Anaheim will build a new stadium for him, by 2017, when he can walk away from the lease. As well as the fact L.A. is the only major city that has not built any of its teams a new stadium, I don't see that changing any time soon. I am sorry to say this, but the Angels will soon fly away to a new home south of the border. MLB won't stop them either. They have already stated they would like to have a team in Mexico, after the success of the Montreal Expos/Washington Nationals home games in San Juan Puerto Rico.--Subman758 (talk) 05:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Brookwood American Cemetery and Memorial‎

I would be happy to discuss your edits to the Brookwood American Cemetery and Memorial‎ article on its Discussion page. Thank you. -- K72ndst (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Help requested...

at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Howard Zimmerman. Maybe some/one of the regular chemistry editors can either write a decent article on Zimmerman, or help explain what he's not getting. LadyofShalott 15:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrene quiamco

Why did you relist the above AfD? Yes, it has not been properly listed originally, which is why DumbBOT rectified that on 15th December. This means that the 7 day discussion period will end at 13:25 22 December (i.e. tomorrow afternoon UTC). There are 6 delete !votes, with no other !votes at all, so I feel that this should not have been relisted, but left for an admin to delete the article, as a concensus has been reached. I'd appreciate it if you would reply (here, to keep the conversation together, if that's OK) and explain the relisting, as I feel that this was out-of-process, as AfD says If not enough people have joined in the discussion to judge consensus, the article will be relisted for several more days.: I think 6 editors is enough to judge consensus! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

At the time I had just come across a couple of AfDs that had been left open for nearly a month; specifically, WP:Articles for deletion/DAX Foundation and WP:Articles for deletion/Danyl Johnson (I had the former CSD'd as a duplicate nomination). So I went back through Category:AfD debates and started clicking on random pages. This particular one stood out as having been open 12 days, but I did not see the DumbBOT notice because I usually expect to see it near the top of a discussion that's been open that long. So I relisted it hoping to provide visibility to the admins who watch AfDs. I did see that consensus was leaning toward delete, but I am not an admin either so I could not close the discussion myself as I might have if the discussion was overwhelmingly leaning toward keep or redirect.

I've never done relisting before, so if I did something that is against policy I apologize. I did ask earlier in the day at WT:AFD if relisting can be construed as canvassing. Another editor responded that relisting can be done "for any sensible reason". I believed at the time that this discussion had fallen off the radar and did not want it to remain open for a month before someone saw it again. If another forum such as WT:AFD or WP:AN is a more appropriate way to do this I'm certainly open to that as well. KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

No, there is no problem in general - and having read your explanation, it makes more sense now! I see that the discussion has been closed by an admin anyway, so it's a moot point now! I wasn't criticising you, I was just genuinely puzzled/curious! Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:44, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia

After your G6 tag, I have just reverted the discussion to it's original state before it was repurposed, and also removed it from today's logs. I've left a note on the editor's page asking them to open a new discussion properly instead of repurposing the closed one. As such, an AfD tag wasn't even placed on the article. I don't think there's a need right now to split the history and create a new page and transclude it.cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 23:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Seattle Mariners Newsletter

MARINERS MOJO NEWSLETTER The WikiProject Seattle Mariners Newsletter Issue 3 – January 2010

"We're going in the right direction. A couple of more wins, post-season, I don't have anything planned until like early November. Hopefully we can have a lot of fun and continue on the path that we're going." — Ken Griffey, Jr., The Canadian Press: January 3, 2010. Project news and announcements This is the projects third newsletter, the first since 2008. If you would like to help, please leave a message on the newsletter talk page and add your name to the editors list. You may have noticed the revamped project page, if you have any suggestions leave them on the main project talk page. Featured content The following articles have been promoted past start-class, or included in the task force's scrutiny, since August, 2009: B-Class status: Russell Branyan, History of the Seattle Mariners & Ryan Rowland-Smith C-Class status: Dustin Ackley, Milton Bradley (baseball), Ben Broussard, Ben Davis (baseball), Jason Davis (baseball), Jason Ellison & Matt Tuiasosopo The following articles were created recently and are under the project scope, they may need to be cleaned-up to meet quality standards: Ralph Henriquez, Jr., History of the Seattle Mariners, List of 2009 Seattle Mariners draft picks, List of 2008 Seattle Mariners draft picks, List of 2007 Seattle Mariners draft picks, List of 2006 Seattle Mariners draft picks, List of Seattle Mariners first-round draft picks , List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting lineups, Kyle Parker, Rich Poythress The article, James Jones (baseball), had a fact featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 9 December 2009. The fact was, Did you know ... that James Jones, a pitcher in college, entered the 2009 Major League Baseball Draft and was selected in the fourth round as an outfielder by the Seattle Mariners?

News from the diamond Center fielder Franklin Gutiérrez and the Mariners agreed to a four-year contract extension on January 8, 2010. The $20.5 million deal includes a fifth-year team option. Read more from The Seattle Times and Major League Baseball The Mariners traded utility player Bill Hall, a PTBNL and cash considerations to the Boston Red Sox for first baseman Casey Kotchman on January 7, 2010. Read more from The Seattle Times and Major League Baseball On January 6, retired Mariners designated hitter Edgar Martínez fell short of the 75% mark needed to be inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum. In his first year of eligibility, Martínez received 36.2% of the vote by the BBWAA. Read more from The Seattle Times and Major League Baseball Utility player Chris Woodward, who played for the Mariners in 2009, signed a Minor League contract with an invitation to spring training with the M's on January 6, 2010. Woodward, 33, hit .239 with Seattle last season before being designated for assignment and was later claimed by the Boston Red Sox off waivers. Read more from The Los Angeles Times and Major League Baseball Former Mariners pitcher Randy Johnson, who won five Cy Young Awards, one in Seattle, officially retired from Major League Baseball on January 5, 2010. In his 21 year Major League career, Johnson had a combined record of 303-166 with a 3.29 earned run average and 4875 strikeouts in 618 games, 603 starts. Read more from The New York Times and Major League Baseball This newsletter was composed by Brian Halvorsen. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please leave a message on the newsletter talk page. If you don't wish to receive this newsletter anymore, please remove your name from the subscribers list on the main talk page page.

--Brian Halvorsen (talk) 04:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I might need help with nominating article for deletion

I tried to see if people think the article" List of dog bite deaths in the United States" should be deleted, but I didn't create a discussion page. Im trying to do this now, but its not exactly working. If you could help, it would be appreciated. i hope this is how one sends a message. Oi. Lollipopfop (talk) 10:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)