Jump to content

Talk:Family Guy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 71.161.58.229 (talk) to last version by MiszaBot I
→‎Family Guy: new section
Line 102: Line 102:
Since it was specifically stated in Season: 3, Episode: 13 "Screwed the Pooch" that Meg's biological father isn't Peter maybe the character section where Meg is mentioned should be altered slightly. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.20.189.8|76.20.189.8]] ([[User talk:76.20.189.8|talk]]) 05:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Since it was specifically stated in Season: 3, Episode: 13 "Screwed the Pooch" that Meg's biological father isn't Peter maybe the character section where Meg is mentioned should be altered slightly. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.20.189.8|76.20.189.8]] ([[User talk:76.20.189.8|talk]]) 05:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:No, that was just a joke. <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|GoUSA]]</font> 05:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
:No, that was just a joke. <font face="Kristen ITC">[[User:Ctjf83|<font color="#ff0000">C</font><font color="#ff6600">T</font><font color="#ffff00">J</font><font color="#009900">F</font><font color="#0000ff">8</font><font color="#6600cc">3</font>]] [[User Talk:Ctjf83|GoUSA]]</font> 05:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

== Family Guy ==

Family Guy is the funnest show in the world

Revision as of 17:46, 25 February 2010

Good articleFamily Guy has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 13, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
January 29, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 1, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 24, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
August 25, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
October 2, 2009Good article nomineeListed
November 3, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
December 3, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
December 13, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Template:Maintained

WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Scapler, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 23 November 2009.


Section: Criticism and controversy

The line "They also commented that the shows Family Guy and American Dad are inadequate for children and are full of sex-themed jokes and foul language." is supposedly based on the interview that note 118 refers to, but the article mentions nothing of the sort. What's going on here? The article's locked so no edit possible...

I've just noticed that too the reference 118 is misused 2/3 times, the reference only mentions south park receiving support from the simpsons and king of the hill staff for ripping on family guy. It does not include any mention of a dislike of being compared to family guy or about being inappropriate for children. You can probably infer from the episode cartoon wars and cartmans behaviour that they do not like being compared to family guy but at the same time they also defend family guy. Either way the statements are not referenced by 118. 94.197.31.197 (talk) 10:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the section about South Park - as stated above the first two parts are not in the interview - the tone of the bit about support from other cartoon writers could be satirical, and certain doesn't equal criticism - all of the major cartoon franchises satirize each other, and it is likely that such 'thanks' is humourously meant. The last bit is not worthy of an encyclopedia - since when did the opinions of Eric Cartman count as criticism? Bertcocaine (talk) 10:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me this section is rather outdated. Maybe because it is locked, but it is lacking substantial criticisms, many of which hold more water that the critiques presented currently. For example, the criticisms of its treatment of issues such as race, mental illness, and figures such as Mother Teresa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.20.57.138 (talk) 04:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons?

I can't find a link to the Seasons pages on here, should they be added? --Maladroitmortal (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are at the very bottom in the Navagation Template. CTJF83 chat 21:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also in the infobox: No. of episodes 136 (List of episodes) DP76764 (Talk) 21:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meg (characters section)

Since it was specifically stated in Season: 3, Episode: 13 "Screwed the Pooch" that Meg's biological father isn't Peter maybe the character section where Meg is mentioned should be altered slightly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.20.189.8 (talk) 05:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was just a joke. CTJF83 GoUSA 05:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy

Family Guy is the funnest show in the world