Talk:Deathstroke

Ephebophilia

I recently added Mr. Wilson to the category of "fictional pedophiles" due to him having had sexual intercourse with a fifteen year old girl, and someone reverted it saying that my information was inaccurate. I know my facts are straight (unless a preference for children is required, in which case give me your imput and we'll work from there; but he had sex with fifteen year old, and that is a pedophilic act), so I'm changing it back. If someone thinks that I'm wrong, say it here and we can discuss it. El Payaso Malo --69.154.61.79 (talk) 03:35, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Pedophilia might not be the correct term, but if nothing else, he should be added to the category of Fictional rapists. Flutterman (talk) 21:33, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Pedophilia means that the person has a sexual preference for prepubescent children. Slade has never shown this to be a preference and we've never seen this introduced as part of her regular character. He was involved with her, but this seems to have more to do with his conflict against the Teen Titans than anything resembling paraphilia. In addition, she was hardly prepubescent. The term rapist is also misleading, because it was an entirely consensual encounter. MrBlonde267 (talk) 00:05, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

But in a way, the term 'rapist' is appropriate because, as is stated on Terra's page, she is mentally unstable, a fact of which Slade took advantage. Something to bear in mind.Flutterman (talk)

Wintergreen

Can someone please add some info about Wintergreen?

There's already a page for Wintergreen: see Wintergreen (comics). --UltimatePyro 21:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

I meant to the Deathstroke entry. Not a single mention of him. I would do it if I knew more. dfg 08:12, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Powers & Abilities

What about listing his abilities and powers instead of just putting them in the panel. he is also a top notch martial artist having been shown to be more than capable of beating batman and bronze tiger. it should also be noted that due to his accelerated think, he was able to beat/outwit 4 members of the Justice League (aquaman, green lantern, the flash and superman)

• Definatly unneccisary. A lot is being made of his 'powers' here, but a simple rundown of what's really significant in the box is more than sufficient. --InShaneee 22:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Taskmaster

Shouldn't there be some comnment on the connection between Deathstroke and Marvel's Taskmaster? I would say Taskmaster is a preview of Deathstroke. Both first appreared in titles drawn by George Pérez (I don't remember if Marv Wolfman was writing Avengers at the time, but I doubt it). Maybe there are comments by those involved about this; I just know that in terms of their look, role, skills/powers, they are similar and share at least one creative parent (Perez) if not more.

This is true, I remember it being noted in Wizard(?) recently as well. T-1000, this is as much "trivia" as Deadpool being (partially) based on Deathstroke, why did you move it back to the main article?

It should have been deleted. There is no proof for any of this. Unless you can cite Wizard, of course. T-1000 22:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't have it in my hands, unfortunately. It was in the most recent or second most recent issue. However, I've checked around online: both were designed by Perez; Taskmaster's first appearance was in spring/summer 1980, Deathstroke's was in fall/winter 1980 after Perez moved from Avengers to Teen Titans. There's no way the similarities are coincidental. I've rewritten it as follows:

*Deathstroke's costume is similar to the Marvel comics mercenary Taskmaster's original design, sharing an orange/blue colour scheme and many design elements (such as buckaneer boots, flared gloves, and a near-identical collection of weapon belts; the largest differences were their masks, Taskmaster's cape, and the white in Taskmaster's costume). Both characters were designed by George Pérez in 1980, within a few months of each other.

Do with it what you will. -- HKMARKS 22:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

That's fine, since it is just facts. I'll re-add it. T-1000 23:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm removing it. It implies a causal relationship between the two that at the very least is uncited, at worst doesn't exist. CovenantD 16:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

The relationship is that they were both design by George Pérez. T-1000 17:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Instead of removing it, why not reword it to remove the causal implication? (Which I honestly don't see.) The similarities are obvious, but we don't know why Perez designed two similar-looking martial-artist mercenaries with personal codes of professionalism in a short period of time. - HKMARKS 23:55, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Natas

If you read up on Deathstroke's history all of his training and skills came from service in the military. The only people ever really said to have trained him or mentored was Adeline Kane and Wintergreen, so were does this Natas come in?

Well, this "Natas" fellow could be one of the historical changes in the wake of Infinite Crisis. It was mentioned that history rewrote itself in some ways, here and there, and there was never a detailed account of all the changes. HXcGeek 12:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

links to robin

The links to robin may need disambiguation. Currently one goes to the dab page and two go to "Robin (comics)", which might be the wrong Robin. Snowman 15:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Adult animation

There is an adult flash player animation involving Slade and Raven from the teen titans. I didn't want to add it to the main page without consensus from people who regularly contribute to his page. To watch it, go here (Warning: Sexual material!!!). --Ghostexorcist 19:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Deadpool in the opening paragraphs

Should that much information about a derivative character (citing, at great detail, one issue of a comic) be in the header? That seems like the wrong place to have that tangent. Perhaps a move down to a subheader later on in the page would be cleaner. --ItsWalky! 23:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AddieHIVE.jpg

Image:AddieHIVE.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Slade.png

Image:Slade.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tt2ravager.PNG

Image:Tt2ravager.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The Dark Knight Video Game

I have not heard any info on a Dark Knight Video game. Is there even one being made. If there is no proof then shouldn't the mention of a game be taken off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.137.237 (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Should be taken off. (JoeLoeb (talk) 00:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC))

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Dark Knight

The section currently reads:

At the 2008 Toy Fair convention a Deathstroke action figure was revealed for the toy line based on the upcoming Dark Knight film, sparking speculation over whether or not Deathstroke will be featured in the film or the animated tie-ins that precede the film. However, Deathstroke was not featured in "Dark Knight" film.

So basically: Some people thought he would appear in the film but he didn't.

Leaving aside the lack of sources for now, is it really worth including that in the entry? I'm sure there is speculation and rumours about various characters appearing in upcoming media outings when they don't end up in them, but I'd not think we want to include this unless the rumour and speculation was itself so widespread that it became notable. Anyone feel strongly about keeping this and if so why? (Emperor (talk) 01:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC))