Jump to content

Barefoot running: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:06patriotsrun5.jpg|frame]]
'''Barefoot running''' is [[running]] while [[barefoot]]—without wearing any shoes on the feet. Running in thin-soled, flexible shoes such as [[moccasin]]s is biomechanically similar, and often equated to barefoot running. Running in modern [[running shoe]]s is quite different, and contrasted with barefoot running.<ref name="liebher" />
'''Barefoot running''' is [[running]] while [[barefoot]]—without wearing any shoes on the feet. Running in thin-soled, flexible shoes such as [[moccasin]]s is biomechanically similar, and often equated to barefoot running. Running in modern [[running shoe]]s is quite different, and contrasted with barefoot running.<ref name="liebher" />



Revision as of 02:21, 22 March 2010

Barefoot running is running while barefoot—without wearing any shoes on the feet. Running in thin-soled, flexible shoes such as moccasins is biomechanically similar, and often equated to barefoot running. Running in modern running shoes is quite different, and contrasted with barefoot running.[1]

Proponents argue that barefoot running is healthier for feet and reduces risk of chronic injuries, notably repetitive stress injuries due to the impact of heel striking in padded running shoes, in addition to other proported benefits. These health claims of barefoot running are supported by some research and advocated by some authorities, but the research is not conclusive or widely accepted in the medical community. Barefoot running is not generally advocated by medical or sports organizations, who, in the main, recommend that suitable padded running shoes be worn, with particular consideration to foot type (type of pronation in heel strike gait).

“People who don’t wear shoes when they run have an astonishingly different strike,” said Daniel E. Lieberman, professor of human evolutionary biology at Harvard University and co-author of a paper appearing in the journal Nature. “By landing on the middle or front of the foot, barefoot runners have almost no impact collision, much less than most shod runners generate when they heel-strike.

"Most people today [in the United States] think barefoot running is dangerous and hurts,"[1] but this is a misconception: "you can run barefoot on the world’s hardest surfaces without the slightest discomfort and pain. All you need is a few calluses to avoid roughing up the skin of the foot."[1]

History

Modern running shoes, extant since the 1970s, are characterized by thick padded soles—generally wedge-shaped with more padding at the heel and less at the forefoot—and, stiff, supportive insoles, which yield a different gait.

Following the evolution of the human foot, human running was universally barefoot or in thin-soled shoes such as moccasins, which continues to this day in some parts of the world, such as Kenya. "For most of human evolutionary history, runners were either barefoot or wore minimal footwear such as sandals or moccasins with smaller heels and little cushioning."[1] In the 1970s new running shoes were introduced,[1] coincident with the interest in jogging, which differed significantly from previous shoes.

Modern movement

Barefoot running has gaining a following on the fringe of the larger running community. Hardcore "barefooters" prefer hard surfaces to softer terrain (e.g., grass, beaches); a few even venture off road.[2] Heading up the movement is the barefoot running guru Ken Bob Saxton,[3] a barefoot marathoner from California.

Rationale for running barefoot

Many runners have switched to barefoot running for relief from chronic injuries. The human foot evolved without padded shoes.[4] The structure of the foot and lower leg is very efficient at absorbing the shock of landing and turning the energy of the fall into forward motion, through the springing action of the foot's natural arch.[citation needed] It is only by placing large amounts of padding under the heel that humans are able to land on the heel rather than the ball of the foot. In doing so, the foot's natural motion is impeded and the arch and lower leg are not able to absorb the shock of the landing. Instead, the shock is sent up through the heel, to the knees and hips.

Barefoot running uses gravity as the main contributor to the forward propulsion, lightly letting the ball of the feet touch the ground to prevent a fall forward and lifting the feet straight up, avoiding friction which would otherwise injury the foot. "The force to drive you forward should only be applied after the foot has settled on the ground completely. Striking the ground, especially with the heel, causes trauma and makes the runner susceptible to injury."[5] It follows that running shoes with heavily padded heels will impede this natural motion. Although there is still much research to be done, there are many studies that suggest that running shoes contribute greatly to the high incidence of injuries among shod runners.[6][7]

Michael Warburton's 2001 review of barefoot running in the journal Sports Science concluded that

Running barefoot is associated with a substantially lower prevalence of acute injuries of the ankle and chronic injuries of the lower leg in developing countries, but well-designed studies of the effects of barefoot and shod running on injury are lacking. Laboratory studies show that the energy cost of running is reduced by about 4% when the feet are not shod. In spite of these apparent benefits, barefoot running is rare in competition, and there are no published controlled trials of the effects of running barefoot on simulated or real competitive performance.[8]

This study reviews much of the scientific literature that connects shod running to both acute injuries, such as ankle sprains, and chronic injuries, such as plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinitis, shin splints, etc.

In their article entitled "Is your prescription of distance running shoes evidence based?" in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, Craig Richards, et al.,[9] determined that there is no evidence to support wearing "distance running shoes featuring elevated cushioned heels and pronation control systems tailored to the individual’s foot type." Richards found no studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals that showed that running shoes either reduce injury rates or improve performance. In fact, Richards issued this challenge to running shoe manufacturers: "Is any running-shoe company prepared to claim that wearing their distance running shoes will decrease your risk of suffering musculoskeletal running injuries? Is any shoe manufacturer prepared to claim that wearing their running shoes will improve your distance running performance? If you are prepared to make these claims, where is your peer-reviewed data to back it up?"

Also from the British Journal of Sports Medicine, S Robbins and E Waked's article, entitled "Hazard of deceptive advertising of athletic footwear"[10] described their study of the effect on a runner's foot strike of the runner's perception of how much padding there was under the foot. The more cushioning runners believe to be under the foot, the harder they strike.

Prominent barefooters

  • Abebe Bikila - former Olympic marathon world-record holder[8]
  • Bruce Tulloh - former European 5k record-holder
  • Christopher McDougall - author of the bestselling book Born to Run[11]
  • Rick Roeber - current consecutive days running barefoot world-record holder
  • Tegla Loroupe - former Olympic marathon world-record holder
  • Zola Budd - former world record holder in the women's 5000 meters[8]
  • Barefoot Ted - documented in the bestselling book Born to Run: A Hidden Tribe, Superathletes, and the Greatest Race the World Has Never Seen [1]
  • Tellman Knudson - "Barefoot Philanthropist" - ran 654 miles consecutively to raise money for homeless youth [2]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Lieberman, quoted is (Hersher 2010)
  2. ^ Wall Street Journal, 'Is barefoot better? Some say running shoeless benefits body and sole'
  3. ^ LJWorld.com / Q&A with Ken Bob Saxton, barefoot-running pioneer
  4. ^ "Barefoot Running". Faze Magazine. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
  5. ^ Gordon Pirie: Running Fast and Injury Free 21
  6. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.09.011, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.09.011 instead.
  7. ^ Running Shoes: Hazardous to Your Joints?. WebMD, January 7, 2010.
  8. ^ a b c Michael Warburton (Dec 2001). "Barefoot Running". Sportscience. 5 (3)).
  9. ^ Richards, C E; Magin, P J; Callister, R (2009). "Is your prescription of distance running shoes evidence-based?". British Journal of Sports Medicine. 43: 159. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.046680.
  10. ^ Robbins, S; Waked, E (1997;). "Hazard of deceptive advertising of athletic footwear". British Journal of Sports Medicine. 1 (4): 299–303. doi:10.1136/bjsm.31.4.299. PMC 1332563. PMID 9429006. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: year (link)
  11. ^ "Barefoot Running". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-10-13.