Jump to content

User talk:Goethicus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DGG (talk | contribs)
copyvio
Soujdspo (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 88: Line 88:
==copyvio==
==copyvio==
I am concerned that you apparently copied the entry for [[International Bibliography of the Social Sciences]] from the company's website--I accidentally discovered this while working on some recent entries for journals. Not only is this a copyright violation, but it gave the article a somewhat promotional tone. I rewrote the article just now, and updated--Proquest purchased it from LSE a few days ago. We need more articles on databases,. but even a stub is preferable to a copyvio. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 02:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I am concerned that you apparently copied the entry for [[International Bibliography of the Social Sciences]] from the company's website--I accidentally discovered this while working on some recent entries for journals. Not only is this a copyright violation, but it gave the article a somewhat promotional tone. I rewrote the article just now, and updated--Proquest purchased it from LSE a few days ago. We need more articles on databases,. but even a stub is preferable to a copyvio. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 02:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

==Jan Dzierzon==

Imie i nazwisko Dzierzona zostalo zmieniona na Johann Dzierzon, to jest pisownia niemiecka. Britanica podaje Jan Dzierżoń (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/175400/Jan-Dzierzon) i tak powinno byc. Rowniez tu (http://bees.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=bees;idno=5017629) angielskie tlumaczenie pracy Dzierzona podaje Dzierżon, Jan. Czy skontaktowales sie z museum w Kluczborku, albo przeczytales dowody i fotokopie w podanych pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka? Pomijanie zrodel polskich jest niedopuszczalne. Ci ktorzy chca zmieniac artykul powinni uznac wage zrodel polskich wage a nie lawirowac na drugorzednych przekladach i niepelnych zrodlach. Podane tez sa wspolczesne artykuly w prasie polskiej i napisane przez Polakow. Trzeba je wniesc do tekstu. Niech chociaz bedzie widoczne ze spoleczenstwo polskie ma silne zdanie na ten temat. Podaje Ci e-mail jezeli chcesz powaznie pracowac bez udzialu szpiegow: erudra@hotmail.com. --Soujdspo (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bierz zawsze pod uwage ze: 1) w okresie Bismarck'a zniemczano imiona celowo 2) Poszukiwania liczbowe zapisu imion na internecie sa falszywka - autorzy wtedy i dzisiaj powtarzaja to co zostalo zniemczone i wprowadzone w pismie, clowo, przez nieuwage lub niewiedze. Jedyna droga czy jego imie powinno byc pisane Jahann czy Jan jest stwierdzenie ze Dzierzon uwazal sie za Polaka i kultywowal polskos, i tak jest zgodnie z dokumentami opisanymi w pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka etc. --Soujdspo (talk) 02:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
--[[User:Soujdspo|Soujdspo]] ([[User talk:Soujdspo|talk]]) 02:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:45, 12 April 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Goethicus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Razorflame (talk) 16:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:IBSS_Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IBSS_Logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 03:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Goethicus! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.


--Zeitgespenst (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008 edition of the WikiProject Germany newsletter

- - Newsletter Bot Talk 14:25, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This newsletter is delivered by a bot to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, - - Newsletter Bot Talk 14:25, 23 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SchmotzigerDonnerstag.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SchmotzigerDonnerstag.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pole, Hungarian, two good friends

Hi, Goethicus. Thanks very much four your contribution to the Pole, Hungarian, two good friends page. I'm confused, because your additions are about Hungarians-Szeklers, rather than Hungarians-Poles. True, this reflects a study in the linked reference. I don't understand what happened (it was not me who wrote the original chapter). Is it possible that the chapter about the genetic link originally had a different source? Or the Hungarian-Pole link is buried somewhere in the linked source? Either choice it is, perhaps it would be better to write about the Hungarian-Polish link or non-link in this article, otherwise readers will be confused over how the Szeklers come into the picture. Regards, -- 18:47, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, it's possible that whoever quoted originally quoted the article as positing a strong genetic link between Poles and Hungarians didn't understand it, or it may be that they misquoted it intentionally for ideological reasons. Thanks for your corrections. --7:44, 4 Aug 2009 (GST)

copyvio

I am concerned that you apparently copied the entry for International Bibliography of the Social Sciences from the company's website--I accidentally discovered this while working on some recent entries for journals. Not only is this a copyright violation, but it gave the article a somewhat promotional tone. I rewrote the article just now, and updated--Proquest purchased it from LSE a few days ago. We need more articles on databases,. but even a stub is preferable to a copyvio. DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Dzierzon

Imie i nazwisko Dzierzona zostalo zmieniona na Johann Dzierzon, to jest pisownia niemiecka. Britanica podaje Jan Dzierżoń (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/175400/Jan-Dzierzon) i tak powinno byc. Rowniez tu (http://bees.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=bees;idno=5017629) angielskie tlumaczenie pracy Dzierzona podaje Dzierżon, Jan. Czy skontaktowales sie z museum w Kluczborku, albo przeczytales dowody i fotokopie w podanych pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka? Pomijanie zrodel polskich jest niedopuszczalne. Ci ktorzy chca zmieniac artykul powinni uznac wage zrodel polskich wage a nie lawirowac na drugorzednych przekladach i niepelnych zrodlach. Podane tez sa wspolczesne artykuly w prasie polskiej i napisane przez Polakow. Trzeba je wniesc do tekstu. Niech chociaz bedzie widoczne ze spoleczenstwo polskie ma silne zdanie na ten temat. Podaje Ci e-mail jezeli chcesz powaznie pracowac bez udzialu szpiegow: erudra@hotmail.com. --Soujdspo (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)



Bierz zawsze pod uwage ze: 1) w okresie Bismarck'a zniemczano imiona celowo 2) Poszukiwania liczbowe zapisu imion na internecie sa falszywka - autorzy wtedy i dzisiaj powtarzaja to co zostalo zniemczone i wprowadzone w pismie, clowo, przez nieuwage lub niewiedze. Jedyna droga czy jego imie powinno byc pisane Jahann czy Jan jest stwierdzenie ze Dzierzon uwazal sie za Polaka i kultywowal polskos, i tak jest zgodnie z dokumentami opisanymi w pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka etc. --Soujdspo (talk) 02:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC) --Soujdspo (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]