Jump to content

Talk:Iron Man 2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Rocknroll47 - "→‎Link to Superhero: "
Ariel ALB (talk | contribs)
Line 64: Line 64:


I heard Thor was going to have a cameo in this movie and that the guy who plays him in the 2011 "Thor" movie will play him. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rocknroll47|Rocknroll47]] ([[User talk:Rocknroll47|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rocknroll47|contribs]]) 16:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I heard Thor was going to have a cameo in this movie and that the guy who plays him in the 2011 "Thor" movie will play him. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rocknroll47|Rocknroll47]] ([[User talk:Rocknroll47|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rocknroll47|contribs]]) 16:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

not a cameo -- some people are saying he's in the russian prison scene (NOT TRUE)

the after-credits scene IS about him, nevertheless [A] 01:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:53, 1 May 2010

Alcoholism

Hey i found here: http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/03/iron-man-2-to-look-behind-the-armor-alcoholism-and-tim-robbins-not-featured/ that it will NOT feature the alcoholism. This was quoted from Robert Downey, Jr. Could someone edit this in please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.38.87 (talk) 04:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Premise and Characters

Would somebody please update the premise and the characters. In a recent issue of Entertainment Weekly and the SHH iron man 2 set preview both had the major plotlines and character descriptions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.219.209.153 (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Christian Bale?

No reference. Removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.207.200 (talk) 06:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roman numeral

Is there a source for the use of a Roman numeral (II)? All the sources I've seen give the Arabic numeral (2).--Marcus Brute (talk) 03:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent logo [1]. Alientraveller (talk) 13:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Here's an even more recent logo (2 June 2009) [2], and it uses the number "2", not the Roman numeral. Doktag (talk) 07:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Picture

Tried to add it myself, but turns out Admins only. [1] AC-42 (talk) 21:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well is the image needed? Alientraveller (talk) 22:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not really needed, but it would be nice to have in since there is no images in the current article. AC-42 (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If it is not really needed, then it should not be included per the non-free content criteria. The article is early in its stage of development. By the time the sequel is released, it will look more like Iron Man (film), in terms of content and images. —Erik (talkcontrib) 23:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unused References

I attempted to remove References 21 (Robert Downey Jr. reveals megawatt cast of Iron Man 2, and Iron Man 3 is on) & 23 (Twitter / Jon Favreau: Shooting a scene with John), which are cited in the article but have absolutely nothing to do with the statements to which they are attached. However, they were added back in. Is there a reason for this? 72.192.217.186 (talk) 05:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad you didn't bother to fully read them, nor bother to look back in the edit history. Both are applicable, just not where they were. Since you couldn't be bothered to do it, I've moved them back to the info they were at some earlier point attached to, or belong with now. Next time, try to improve the articles. And deleting citations often looks like vandalism. Try to correct intermediate edits, not blank. ThuranX (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Olivia Munn is NOT the Iron Maiden.

Whaty Favreau jokingly implies before saying you'll find out when the movie comes out is NOT what we should report. THe only sources that say ANYTHING about it all agree he's joking, and we don't need to cover every single joke made during promotion of the film. ThuranX (talk) 14:26, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. If it's been confirmed since this comment was written, then fine. If not, based on the citation it is tied to, "an unspecified role" works. --99.186.108.193 (talk) 10:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Viral Clues

In the second paragraph under the Marketing section, the article states, "A set of viral clues to the plot of the film have also been released on the internet." There is no source. Aside from simply improving this article, a source would also benefit fans interested in the film. User:anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.155.7 (talk) 01:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should list actors salaries in

As the price of the movie goes to $200 million, we should also include the actors salaries. I mean the main salaries are pulling $5 to $20 million on this film, we should list the salaries in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.95.140.176 (talk) 22:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at any other film article, none has the budget explained or the salary given, some have the budget and another line for marketing but that's all, look at Film budgeting#Examples, and we actually don't have a reference to the official budget. --Exrain (talk) 03:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Budget and running time

Where did that info come from? If no reference is provided it should be removed. --Exrain (talk) 03:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This was done in this edit and this edit. I have removed both. Thanks. —Mike Allen 04:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you want the prominent link? The target is pure embarrassment. Please see my thread here. Tony (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Embarrassment" according to who? Who asked for your input? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.235.28 (talk) 02:32, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thor?

I heard Thor was going to have a cameo in this movie and that the guy who plays him in the 2011 "Thor" movie will play him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocknroll47 (talkcontribs) 16:18, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

not a cameo -- some people are saying he's in the russian prison scene (NOT TRUE)

the after-credits scene IS about him, nevertheless [A] 01:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)