Talk:Penis

Who's Penis

If it was up to anyone you should get a pictures of all the different "types" of Penis'.

Why are all the penises on white dudes? Can we get a little color in here? 76.124.89.139 (talk) 21:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit request

{{editsemiprotected}}

Whoa boys! Just came across this article straight from a completely innocuous one about farming methods and wasn't expecting all the explicit pornography. I thought I had merely opened up an enclycopaedic article about anatomy but was half sickened by it all - can't imagine how some of the young girls would feel! Definitely those hardcore photos need to replaced by (if anything) less explicit illustrations more appropriate for educational purposes. Please!

Please read the various items at the top of this page; there is a discussion in the FAQ specifically regarding this issue. Tony Fox (arf!) 03:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

"Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive, even exceedingly so (see Wikipedia:Content disclaimer). Anyone can edit an article, and changes made are displayed immediately, so Wikipedia cannot guarantee that articles or images will always be acceptable to all readers, or that they will adhere to general social or religious norms.

Obviously inappropriate content (such as an irrelevant link to a shock site, or clear vandalism) is usually removed quickly. Content that is judged to violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, or that violates other Wikipedia policies (especially neutral point of view) or the laws of the U.S. state of Florida where Wikipedia's servers are hosted, will also be removed. However, some articles may include text, images, or links which some people may find objectionable, when these materials are relevant to the content. Discussion of potentially objectionable content should not focus on its offensiveness but on whether it is appropriate to include in a given article. Beyond that, "being objectionable" is generally not sufficient grounds for removal of content."

If you find some images offensive you can configure your browser to mask them. ^Avicenna_sis @ 03:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I was surprised to hear your report of pornography on the Penis article, and so I went to go find it and remove it immediately. But -- I could not find anything pornographic, just some pictures of several penises. I reviewed the text, and found just an article describing human anatomy. Someone must have removed the pornography. Atom (talk) 03:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Dude, You are correct. This i not supposed to be there. Bussygirl i —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bussygirl i (talk • contribs) 13:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Bully2, 26 April 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} example of a penis deviation: please show a bild of a dick, which is not straight but curved upwards (most common). the curve is moderat, so there are no problems to have sex. [[File:penisdeviation2.jpg|25px]]

Bully2 (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done: Spitfire19 (Talk) 22:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Not done: - there are more suitable articles to discuss normal or abnormal curvature of the penis, such as Peyronie's disease or Chordee. There's no need for additional images in this article. --Darkwind (talk) 22:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

ok, seriously

um.. why cant we get a picture of a penis of a younger dude for the top of the page? i doubt it'd be hard to find. do we really need to see some old guys dick? its all wrinkly.. and the grey pubic hair i could also really do without.

just saying.

wikipedia isn't your personal masturbation station.

Just saying. (98.222.182.133 (talk) 05:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC))