Jump to content

User talk:Csabi911: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 58: Line 58:


[[Special:Contributions/79.154.202.3|79.154.202.3]] ([[User talk:79.154.202.3|talk]]) 15:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/79.154.202.3|79.154.202.3]] ([[User talk:79.154.202.3|talk]]) 15:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

email with permisssion has been sent to {{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}

[[Special:Contributions/79.154.202.3|79.154.202.3]] ([[User talk:79.154.202.3|talk]]) 16:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:01, 9 May 2010

Hello, Csabi911, and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, Csaba Zvekan, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csabi911 (talkcontribs)

How weird to give yourself a spam notice but I take this as agreement that the article was spam. -- RHaworth 20:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

to RHAWORTH No, the system did I just read that you should not delete it ! I'm not promoting any product ,company or service this is false. I am making an entry of a musician that has refences to other WIKIPEDIA entries. See all the internal links

File permission problem with File:Csaba-Zvekan.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Csaba-Zvekan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Content

I can take a look later on, although it probably won't be until this evening due to work. In the meantime, try taking a look at WP:NPOV and see if that will be of some help; also make sure that you have several reliable sources that are not published by the subject and cover the subject in significant detail.

On a side note, could I ask why you have a bot template on your userpage? That template is reserved for approved bot accounts only, and if you're not running one, it really doesn't belong there. Hersfold non-admin(t/a/c) 15:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a page you've been working on, or did you want me to review the deleted article? Hersfold non-admin(t/a/c) 15:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I'm on the right account, I can see that you've had three pages deleted, but they were all deleted back in 2006. At this point it'll probably be easier to start from scratch. How about you start by making a user subpage (at User talk:Csabi911/article or something) and start writing a rough draft. Once you've gotten some content in there, let me know and I'll see what we can do with it. The two links I have you earlier should be some help, but if you have any questions don't hesitate to let me know. Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll cover the picture first - it looks like OTRS needs some sort of confirmation about who took the picture and what licenses it was released under. You'll need to email them again with this information; they should have sent a response to you, which probably outlines the problems more clearly. If not, you may want to ask an OTRS volunteer directly about what the issue was.
As for the article, the big thing you need right now is sources. You don't have any throughout the article, and these are required, not only to verify what you've added in but also to demonstrate notability. Reading through the article, I don't immediately see that he meets any of the criteria listed for musicians listed at WP:MUSIC.
Take some time to read through those pages and see if you can fix those issues; once you've done so, let me know. If you need any help, feel free to ask. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Csaba Zvekan. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. Favonian (talk) 22:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page Csaba Zvekan has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see this page for instructions. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Csaba Zvekan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Clearly a copy of this website. Favonian (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Csaba-Zvekan.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.csabazvekan.com/. As a copyright violation, File:Csaba-Zvekan.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Csaba-Zvekan.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 15:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I wasn't logged in. I thought that the Creative Commons rights granted would be enough . But I guess the GNU was missing. My mistake. Thanks for correcting all the mistakes we made for Killing Machine . Do I still have to send an email to address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org ?

79.154.202.3 (talk) 15:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

email with permisssion has been sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org

79.154.202.3 (talk) 16:01, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]