Talk:William Caxton: Difference between revisions
rating |
No edit summary |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Date of birth== |
==Date of birth== |
||
[http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&rls=HPAA,HPAA:2006-05,HPAA:en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=william+caxton+13+august+1422&spell=1 Some sources] seem to think he was born 13 August 1422. Is this supported historically, or is it just supposition that's been repeated wildly? -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) |
[http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&rls=HPAA,HPAA:2006-05,HPAA:en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=william+caxton+13+august+1422&spell=1 Some sources] seem to think he was born 13 August 1422. Is this supported historically, or is it just supposition that's been repeated wildly? -- [[User:JackofOz|JackofOz]] ([[User talk:JackofOz|talk]]) |
||
==Works Published== |
|||
Should a "works published" section be included? [[User:Renfield|Renfield]] ([[User talk:Renfield|talk]]) 02:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:05, 7 June 2010
![]() | England Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Biography Start‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | London Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
This "Prologue to his Aeneids" is a rather long sample, since it's three times the length of the rest of the article. Could a simple link to an external source suffice? Also, there doesn't seem to be much discussion of why this sample is even included, which makes it somewhat irrelevant to the article. Is it his greatest piece of writing? Does it have some other significance?
ryan 23:29, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Source of quotation
Can a anyone give a reference for "If 'tis wrong I do, then 'tis a fine and noble wrong"? It doesn't SOUND like late 15th century (perhaps a hundred years later); there are only 4 Google hits, all of which seem to derive from Wikipedia; and it isn't in Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. MacAuslan (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Date of birth
Some sources seem to think he was born 13 August 1422. Is this supported historically, or is it just supposition that's been repeated wildly? -- JackofOz (talk)
Works Published
Should a "works published" section be included? Renfield (talk) 02:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)