Jump to content

Talk:Lynndie England: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 30: Line 30:


Is she out of jail? If so, when was she released? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] ([[User talk:Czolgolz|talk]]) 13:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Is she out of jail? If so, when was she released? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] ([[User talk:Czolgolz|talk]]) 13:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

- 3 years is not enough. How could they do that to other living beings?! i say life time imprisonment. or at least ten years


==WP:BLP==
==WP:BLP==

Revision as of 14:03, 13 June 2010

Ethnicity

Does anyone know what England's ancestry is? Most people with the surname of England are of Irish origin.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Who cares? 201.231.81.83 (talk) 00:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prison

Is she out of jail? If so, when was she released? Czolgolz (talk) 13:41, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- 3 years is not enough. How could they do that to other living beings?! i say life time imprisonment. or at least ten years

WP:BLP

Please note WP:BLP#Lynndie England. It may be time to remove the most graphic material from this BLP, in favour of a short summary, and link instead to Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse, incorporating any unique material there. Jayen466 23:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prostitute Hobo

Can someone explain this reference in the opening sentence - which does not appear to be supported anywhere in the text?Irish Melkite (talk) 15:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of vandalism has always been a problem here. I removed the phrase, although I'm now having some regrets, as it illustrates the times we live in rather well.
Critics of U.S. policy have some need to express their opposition to Abu Ghraib and GTMO as strongly as possible. I think it comes from the fact that they're rather feckless when their fascist friends use real torture, and so they must overcompensate to reestablish an appearance of human rights bona fides whenever a scandal like this comes along.
-- Randy2063 (talk) 16:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That kind of politically charged rhetoric, Randy, in unnecessary, and betrays bias. Let's keep things objective here, shall we? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.65.34.68 (talk) 15:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]