Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m comment |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 July 10#{{anchorencode:Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
:{{la|Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 July 10#{{anchorencode:Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser}}|2=AfD statistics}}) |
||
:({{Find sources|Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser}}) |
:({{Find sources|Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser}}) |
||
Delete per the prodder, {{user|Baffle gab1978}}, who noted that this is [[Wikipedia:Original research|original research]] and an unreferenced essay. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 06:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete.''' Seriously? Speedy was declined on this? To say it violates [[WP:NOTHOWTO]] wouldn't be telling the half of it. '''Erpert''' [[User talk:Erpert|(let's talk about it)]]</small> 07:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Delete.''' Why is this even being discussed? It's unsalvageable to the point of being [[WP:Patent nonsense|patent nonsense]] and I'm nominating it as such. [[User:C1k3|C1k3]] ([[User talk:C1k3|talk]]) 08:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete.''' Why is this even being discussed? It's unsalvageable to the point of being [[WP:Patent nonsense|patent nonsense]] and I'm nominating it as such. [[User:C1k3|C1k3]] ([[User talk:C1k3|talk]]) 08:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
:'''Comment''' Unfortunately, It doesn't qualify as nonsense in the Wikipedia sense, as it's quite comprehensible. [[User:Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978]] ([[User talk:Baffle gab1978|talk]]) 13:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
:'''Comment''' Unfortunately, It doesn't qualify as nonsense in the Wikipedia sense, as it's quite comprehensible. [[User:Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978]] ([[User talk:Baffle gab1978|talk]]) 13:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - it's [[WP:CB]]. No notability, written in an undeniably promotional/how-to style etc. [[User:Claritas|Claritas]] [[User talk:Claritas|§]] 10:04, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - it's [[WP:CB]]. No notability, written in an undeniably promotional/how-to style etc. [[User:Claritas|Claritas]] [[User talk:Claritas|§]] 10:04, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - per [[WP:NOTHOWTO]], the second person tense makes it sound like an infomercial, without the actual name of the product they're trying to sell. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 10:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - per [[WP:NOTHOWTO]], the second person tense makes it sound like an infomercial, without the actual name of the product they're trying to sell. [[User:TomCat4680|TomCat4680]] ([[User talk:TomCat4680|talk]]) 10:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
* |
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NOTHOWTO]]. <font color="#082567">[[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]]</font> <sup><font color="#E3A857">[[User talk:Armbrust|Talk]]</font></sup> <sub><font color="#008000">[[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|Contribs]]</font></sub> 10:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
**'''Merge and redirect''' to [[Assistive technology]] as it isn't notable to have a stand alone article. <font color="#082567">[[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]]</font> <sup><font color="#E3A857">[[User talk:Armbrust|Talk]]</font></sup> <sub><font color="#008000">[[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|Contribs]]</font></sub> 21:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
**'''Merge and redirect''' to [[Assistive technology]] as it isn't notable to have a stand alone article. <font color="#082567">[[User:Armbrust|Armbrust]]</font> <sup><font color="#E3A857">[[User talk:Armbrust|Talk]]</font></sup> <sub><font color="#008000">[[Special:Contributions/Armbrust|Contribs]]</font></sub> 21:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
* |
*'''Delete'''- [[WP:NOTHOWTO]] and [[WP:CB]], not to mention [[WP:YOUHAVEGOTTOBEKIDDING]]. [[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 11:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
**'''Merge''' Fences & Windows's new version into [[Assistive technology]]. Good job on the rewrite, but I think this is an unlikely search term. [[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 19:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
**'''Merge''' Fences & Windows's new version into [[Assistive technology]]. Good job on the rewrite, but I think this is an unlikely search term. [[User:Reyk|<font color="Maroon">'''Reyk'''</font>]] <sub>[[User talk:Reyk|'''<font color="Blue">YO!</font>''']]</sub> 19:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' as per nomination. [[User:Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978]] ([[User talk:Baffle gab1978|talk]]) 13:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' as per nomination. [[User:Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978]] ([[User talk:Baffle gab1978|talk]]) 13:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:16, 12 July 2010
Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser
- Toilet Seat Riser or Toilet Riser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete per the prodder, Baffle gab1978 (talk · contribs), who noted that this is original research and an unreferenced essay. Cunard (talk) 06:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Seriously? Speedy was declined on this? To say it violates WP:NOTHOWTO wouldn't be telling the half of it. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Why is this even being discussed? It's unsalvageable to the point of being patent nonsense and I'm nominating it as such. C1k3 (talk) 08:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Unfortunately, It doesn't qualify as nonsense in the Wikipedia sense, as it's quite comprehensible. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - it's WP:CB. No notability, written in an undeniably promotional/how-to style etc. Claritas § 10:04, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - per WP:NOTHOWTO, the second person tense makes it sound like an infomercial, without the actual name of the product they're trying to sell. TomCat4680 (talk) 10:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTHOWTO. Armbrust Talk Contribs 10:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Assistive technology as it isn't notable to have a stand alone article. Armbrust Talk Contribs 21:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete- WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:CB, not to mention WP:YOUHAVEGOTTOBEKIDDING. Reyk YO! 11:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Merge Fences & Windows's new version into Assistive technology. Good job on the rewrite, but I think this is an unlikely search term. Reyk YO! 19:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - def. not a manual Hekerui (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - as a sort of infomercial - but it does not fit neatly into what could be speedily deleted, such as spam. Bearian (talk) 20:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. Fences&Windows 16:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Rather than joining the delete pile-on I've turned it into a valid sourced stub. These devices are common for people with disabilities. Fences&Windows 16:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per the fantastic rewrite by Fences and windows. I suggest a rename to toilet seat riser or to toilet riser, which are plausible search terms. Cunard (talk) 01:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep and rename to Toilet seat riser. The article still needs work, though, because it reads more like a trivia section. Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)