User talk:CT Cooper

UGAdawgs2010

Thanks for your help with UGAdawgs2010 (talk · contribs) and his IP, I had just filed a case at the edit war board on him. Just to let you know, he also has the UGAdawgs2011 (talk · contribs) account, which he just used to comment on the talk page. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 18:18, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

And now new account Truthiness101 (talk · contribs) has jumped right back into the fray on the same page. Dayewalker (talk) 18:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. I have blocked both. I saw the previous block on the IP and decided just to drop in today and see what was happening; I think it was a good job I did. I have just spotted Truthiness101, and I'm looking into it now. CT Cooper · talk 18:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I have blocked indef. Truthiness101, as it was a WP:DUCK passing sock. I will keep a look out for any more socks on Eric Holder. CT Cooper · talk 18:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Gracias again, now there's IP 95.154.230.252 (talk · contribs) picking up the edit war. Can we just get the page semi-protected, and force all of this to the talk page where it belongs? Thanks again. Dayewalker (talk) 19:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I have semi-protected Eric Holder for 2 weeks to stop this spree of socks. The protection can be extended as necessary if problems continue after expiry. Given that UGAdawgs2010 clearly has no interest in complying with policy, I have raised the block on the master account to indefinite. (S)he is not permitted to edit Wikipedia at all while this block stands, however if I see him contributing more productively on the talk page, or an indication that he will stop edit warring, then I will consider lifting the block. CT Cooper · talk 19:36, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

A "new" editor (66.199.232.141) has just arrived, eger to defend UGAdawgs2010 - SummerPhD (talk) 21:01, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

And here is another (216.169.110.204). Thanks for your attention in this matter. MarnetteD | Talk 21:16, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Here are two more (174.137.52.234) and (109.200.6.49). I am afraid that EH's talk page may need semiprotection for a day or two (though I know that isn't done very often). I am done posting there as feeding the trolls is taking up too much time. MarnetteD | Talk 21:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

This is one of those few cases when talk page semi-protection is justified. I have semi-protected it, along with other articles being targeted, given it is clear this user has never ending supply of IPs. CT Cooper · talk 21:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I have also range blocked 174.137.52.0/24 as it appears this a narrow range of IPs being used by the user. This is short 35 hour block over the existing blocks, due to the potential collateral damage of range blocks. CT Cooper · talk 21:39, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk page semi-protected for one day

Hello Christopher,

I applied a short 1 day semi protection on your talk page par a WP:RFPP request, due to the large amount of IP sock puppets that were making a mess of things. I realize user talk pages are rarely semi-protected (Especially other users semi talk pages) but in this case i decided to go ahead and apply a short protection until you are around to decide what to do with this. If you do not wish to leave it protected, by all means remove the protection. (And feel free to trout me if you feel this was a stupid action)

Kind regards, Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 00:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Well it seems a lot has happened since I was asleep, you did the right thing given that this talk page was being over run by IPs, so good work. When I first blocked this user for a 3RR violation, I did not expect it to end with en masse range blocks and semi-protection, but that's what happens when you upset a troll. CT Cooper · talk 08:37, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Dubai fountains

I have re-added the content after writing it in my own words, and now it doesnt seems copyright violation.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 10:45, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it seems okay now to be me, good work. CT Cooper · talk 11:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Aitchison College's logo

Hello. I read your post concerning the logo of Aitchison College. The logo is not copyright and can be used freely by anyone. I am a student of the College and the logo was obtained from the relevant people in the College. It is available easily to everyone and is also up on the College's website, http://www.aitchison.edu.pk. Thank you --Hammad (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I will add the source of the school website to the image, but I'm afraid you must provide evidence of permission that the school has explicitly released the logo under a free licence. See WP:PERMIT. CT Cooper · talk 17:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I am awfully sorry but there is no explicit proof which we can get at the moment. However, I am sure that there is absolutely no copyright granted to Aitchison. this is because in Pakistan, there is little issue of copyright problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mianhammad59 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, so it will be difficult to leave the image with the current licensed claimed without proof that the school has actually put the image under that particular licence. The easiest thing to do here would be to assume the image is copyrighted and keep as non-free content under a claim of fair use. I will convert it to fair use now for you, so the image isn't deleted. CT Cooper · talk 19:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

96.32.148.0/24

Hi. 96.32.148.208 (talk · contribs) is requesting an unblock. He/she seems to be caught in a range block of 96.32.148.0/24. Can you respond to his request? I have no idea if this person actually is the individual you are looking to block or not. --B (talk) 21:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually, upon looking at contributions, I see that this IP is obviously one in the same with UGAdawgs2010 and this IP has been held for more than a few days. I'm going to decline the request. If you wish to overturn that decline, feel free. --B (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I agree with your position, there are too many coincidences here, I have declined the unblock request. CT Cooper · talk 21:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Connormah 2

Ya might want to check your grammar there- you called him "the Connormah"! I assume you meant "the candidate" or just "Connormah" but got confused halfway through typing! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I do try and proof read, but errors do still frequently slip through. CT Cooper · talk 22:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

You're not the only one- I do that kind of thing all the time! Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Maybe it was an honorific? Henceforce, please refer to me as "The Right Honourable Xeno" !. –xeno^talk 22:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

I will stick to "The Supreme Bureaucrat Xeno". CT Cooper · talk 09:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

*voice of dog from "Up"* I love you!

Thank you so much for protecting my userpage! o0pandora0o (talk) 09:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Squirrel!

You're very welcome O0pandora0o. You'll be pleased to hear I have seen Up, so I understand the joke! Keep exploring! CT Cooper · talk 09:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

things missing from the americas funniest home videoes article.

the exact details are on the americas funniest home videoes discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.72.121 (talk) 10:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

You got a minute?

Or are you too busy sucking that nigger dick you fucking faggot