User talk:Guoguo12: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Guoguo12/Archive 1. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
at deletion review I've supported restoration so AfD can decide, but unless you do have more material, it seems hopeless. Frankly, I would have speedied it myself '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 01:22, 30 October 2010 (UTC) |
at deletion review I've supported restoration so AfD can decide, but unless you do have more material, it seems hopeless. Frankly, I would have speedied it myself '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 01:22, 30 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Well, we'll see what happens. Thanks for your input. <span style="white-space:nowrap">[[User:Guoguo12|<font color="green">Guoguo12</font>]][[User talk:Guoguo12|<font color="blue" size="1">'''''--Talk--'''''</font> ]]</span> 02:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC) |
:Well, we'll see what happens. Thanks for your input. <span style="white-space:nowrap">[[User:Guoguo12|<font color="green">Guoguo12</font>]][[User talk:Guoguo12|<font color="blue" size="1">'''''--Talk--'''''</font> ]]</span> 02:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
sorry neqka |
Revision as of 23:16, 31 October 2010
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
Welcome! If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes. A tilde is a "~" and the key for it is below the ESC key.
For past conversations, see Archive 1.
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
This is Guoguo12's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Hello. This is a courtesy notice to let you know that I have restored this page as it neither meets any of the CSD criteria, nor is a disambiguation page. You are welcome to list that page on WP:AfD if you feel it does not belong, but please check the category this page is in first or consider requesting the creation of the currently red-linked items (I'll be happy to oblige). Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); October 4, 2010; 14:20 (UTC)
- Hmm... right you are. My mistake; I assumed it was a disambiguation page. Guoguo12--Talk-- 19:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. It sure looked like one; I added more entries and changed the format so it, while still by no means complete, at least doesn't resemble a dab that much. It's one of the older pages; at least it got the attention it needed :) Thanks.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); October 4, 2010; 19:55 (UTC)
Hello, I've declined your CSD nomination and reverted to an earlier revision, back to when it was a dab page. I actually deleted it, but the talk page gave me a pause! Best, Airplaneman ✈ 23:57, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Shoot, sorry about that. Sigh... I need to pay more attention to things... Thanks for catching that! Guoguo12--Talk-- 00:13, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
i don't care if that discussion gets deleted. i made it as a joke and was fully expecting it to get reverted. A Word Of Advice From A Beast: Don't Be Silly, Wrap Your Willy! 01:27, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Please do not make joke pages or edits. Wikipedia is an actual encyclopedia, not a circus. I might also mention that Twinkle, the anti-vandal script I use, automatically adds the message to your talk page; I don't personally do it. Guoguo12--Talk-- 01:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Faboosting and Faboost Wiki
Why is my Faboost Wiki up to be deleted please tell me so i can sort it out and stop what it is???
Thanks Arianinja —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arianinja (talk • contribs) 21:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, I have tagged the article "Faboost" for deletion because Wikipedia is not a dictionary. More significantly, the article does not cite any reliable sources that mention "Faboost". In addition, I could not find any reliable sources that talk about the word "faboost", meaning that it is possibly not notable enough to be on Wikipedia as per WP:GNG. If you feel I am mistaken, you can argue your case at the AfD page for the article: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faboost. Thanks. Guoguo12--Talk-- 21:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick feed back i have improved the wikipedia with references and things like that so you can find out more about it please check it again and give me more feedback if you what more on it and i will see what i can do as i don't want my article deleted as have had a lot of positive for it.
- Thanks Arianinja —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arianinja (talk • contribs) 21:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have taken a look at the article. Three of the seven refs. provide are YouTube links. Since YouTube videos can be made and uploaded by anyone, they are typically not considered reliable sources as per WP:SPS. I did not view the two lovefilm.com video links, but I believe that they too are unacceptable because they are primary sources (I may be wrong here, though). Finally, the two BD Horror News refs. seem okay, but they do not mention the word "faboost", leaving no verification of the existence of the word. Again, remember that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. For additional comments, seek help at WP:RfF. Thanks. Guoguo12--Talk-- 22:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Please check chloe's twitter as she says that she is suprised that the word has hit off and that it has come from the word fabulous also if you go onto facebook and the official uk let me in page there in a link to the wiki and a reference to faboost in a message. i will make sure the 2 pages are referenced now
- I have taken a look at the article. Three of the seven refs. provide are YouTube links. Since YouTube videos can be made and uploaded by anyone, they are typically not considered reliable sources as per WP:SPS. I did not view the two lovefilm.com video links, but I believe that they too are unacceptable because they are primary sources (I may be wrong here, though). Finally, the two BD Horror News refs. seem okay, but they do not mention the word "faboost", leaving no verification of the existence of the word. Again, remember that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. For additional comments, seek help at WP:RfF. Thanks. Guoguo12--Talk-- 22:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- thanks again arianinja —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arianinja (talk • contribs) 22:37, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Franz Lidz
You have mistakenly reverted the Franz Lidz page to a bogus one (later undone) bearing a photo og Richard Dreyfus and various facts about the actor's life and career. Please use a later version in the Lidz history. Also, for the last week Robert Garside has ben attacking (and deleting) facts/links from the page under two different accounts. The facts involve an unflattering 2002 profile Lidz wrote about Garside in Sports Illustrated -- citation provided in footnotes. (The story is on the SI site). Can you close the entry to Mr. Garside? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagarhead (talk • contribs) 19:32, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm... I see. I will revert my mistaken edit and I'll see what I can do about the edit warring. Thanks for your help. Oh, and by the way, I'm not an administrator. :< Guoguo12--Talk-- 19:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Guoguo12, this is false. Slanderous comments about living people are not permitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dromeaz (talk • contribs) 19:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, so it turns out that Lagarhead was a sockpuppet of Lanknek112. I apologize, but I had no clue. I think I'll leave this to the admins at WP:ANI to resolve. I apologize for any inconvenience, but I am not going to make any further edits on Franz Lidz until the issue is resolved. Thanks. Guoguo12--Talk-- 19:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Virginia Street Bridge
On 27 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Virginia Street Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Your recent revert
Please do not revert edits by user who blanked pages that they created because they're the author and they want it deleted because they blanked it. Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry! Since the speedy deletion temp. indicates that there is "no content" on the page, I assumed that the reverted edit was made with bad faith to remove the speedy deletion template. (Here is my revert: [1].) Guoguo12--Talk-- 20:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- That's okay but only time you should revert in that situation is when a user removes a speedy deletion tag on any article. Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Very well. Thanks for pointing out my mistake. Guoguo12--Talk-- 20:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. Keep up your good work on Huggle fighting vandalism. Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- That's okay but only time you should revert in that situation is when a user removes a speedy deletion tag on any article. Wayne Olajuwon chat 20:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppet
The IP is a sockpuppet of Pricer1980 (talk · contribs). See previously-blocked sock's edit and the new edit. Banned users don't get to edit. Erik (talk | contribs) 20:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry! Still, the IP should be tagged so that it appears at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Pricer1980 to make things clearer. Guoguo12--Talk-- 20:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'll do that, but it's usually not worth it. The banned user has many IP sockpuppets (always a new IP address every time). The vandalism is very sneaky, but I've learned the pattern. Erik (talk | contribs) 20:18, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- Very well then. Thanks for your work and happy editing. :) Guoguo12--Talk-- 20:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- You too! And I'll lay off the rollback. I was quite sure of the sockpuppetry, but I need to remember others may need to know the background. Erik (talk | contribs) 20:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Deletion review (untitled)
at deletion review I've supported restoration so AfD can decide, but unless you do have more material, it seems hopeless. Frankly, I would have speedied it myself DGG ( talk ) 01:22, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well, we'll see what happens. Thanks for your input. Guoguo12--Talk-- 02:45, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
sorry neqka