User talk:Dolovis: Difference between revisions
m Notification: RFD posting of Travis Erstad. (TW) |
|||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
== Brendan Gallagher listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
== Brendan Gallagher listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Brendan Gallagher]]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Brendan Gallagher'' redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 24#Brendan Gallagher|the redirect discussion]] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Ho-ju-96|Ho-ju-96]] ([[User talk:Ho-ju-96|talk]]) 09:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC) |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Brendan Gallagher]]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Brendan Gallagher'' redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 24#Brendan Gallagher|the redirect discussion]] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Ho-ju-96|Ho-ju-96]] ([[User talk:Ho-ju-96|talk]]) 09:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Travis Erstad listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Travis Erstad]]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Travis Erstad'' redirect, you might want to participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 25#Travis Erstad|the redirect discussion]] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> –[[::User:Schmloof|Schmloof]] ([[::User talk:Schmloof|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Schmloof|contribs]]) 10:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:27, 25 November 2010
|
Thanks
for the message. I read the talk on the link you gave - interesting to see it pointed out that the project doesn't have jurisdiction over categories - sometimes it really seems that the hockey group doesn t see it that way or that categories interconnect with other topics/areas (that the world doesn t actually revolve around hockey, not to say I don t enjoy it too) Not to excuse too some of the poor edits I have made in their eyes - I like details and nuances and this often gets me in trouble! Regards, Mayumashu (talk) 23:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Happy editing. Cheers! Dolovis (talk) 17:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey
I should probably have said this awhile ago, but for what its worth you are doing great work with senior players and teams etc. Keep it up. It was a shame we got off to such a bad start. I do accept your explanation that you are not your nephew, but you have to admit that it looked very suspicious that as soon as me and you had an arguement that a very larger number of my articles were afd'd and related articles to those ones were prod'd all at once. The fact the CU (i am guessing) found you to be located in the same town didn't help matters but does show that I wasn't that offbase on thinking it was a possibility. Anyways I just want you to know that this is in the past atleast from my side. If you need any help with anything let me know. Senior hockey was an area that we were certainly lacking in and you have done alot there. I especially appreciate the stuff on the Port Arther Bearcats. I had been meaning to clean that one up for awhile as they are from my home town. -DJSasso (talk) 14:14, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The Canadian Content Award
Awarded for making decent stubs about former Canadian ice hockey olympians. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC) |
Just FYI, Thanks for alerting about the discrepancy on the talk page about the article appearing on DYK. The original hook mentioned on the talk page was not the one which appeared on DYK on July 29; (See Wikipedia:Recent_additions/2010/July#29_July_2010). I have corrected the talk page with the correct hook. Happy editing Ottawa4ever (talk) 09:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Mike Moore
Hi. Since you changed Mike Moore to redirect to a disambiguation page, please don't forget to fix the incoming links to that title. Thanks. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- I have now fixed the article links. Dolovis (talk) 18:14, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- Moving such a high profile page without any prior discussion (let alone an edit summary) is pretty poor form. Schwede66 16:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- WP:BOLD, and my edit have summaries. Dolovis (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, the move had an edit summary; my apologies. I see you were blocked earlier this month. Maybe a case of WP:TooBold? My advice stands—moving such a high profile page should not be done without any prior discussion. When page moves are potentially controversial, you should use the formal move request process. It takes a week to go through the motions, but it avoids upsetting other editors, and keeps you out of trouble. Schwede66 12:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
- WP:BOLD, and my edit have summaries. Dolovis (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
requesting images
I see you are very busy adding requests of photographs for hockey players. Just a little tip to make the request more specific: {{WikiProject Ice Hockey|bio=yes|needs-photo=yes}}--Traveler100 (talk) 07:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
AutoWikiBrowser
FYI: [1]. Please use the tool wisely.--Chaser (talk) 00:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Sorry about not following normal protocol. Thanks to your advice I have now created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Gallagher as I feel Gallagher does not currently meet notability standards. Feel free to discuss the issue further if you disagree. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 18:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Brendan Gallagher listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Brendan Gallagher. Since you had some involvement with the Brendan Gallagher redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ho-ju-96 (talk) 09:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Travis Erstad listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Travis Erstad. Since you had some involvement with the Travis Erstad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). –[[::User:Schmloof|Schmloof]] ([[::User talk:Schmloof|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Schmloof|contribs]]) 10:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)