Jump to content

User talk:Mr.Z-man: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎thank you: new section
Line 91: Line 91:
Just to tell you, we renamed the wikiproject, from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance]] to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia]]. And per that, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance/Popular pages]] has been moved to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia/Popular pages]]. Is this enough for continuation of popular pages? Thanks in advance! --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 21:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Just to tell you, we renamed the wikiproject, from [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance]] to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia]]. And per that, [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance/Popular pages]] has been moved to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia/Popular pages]]. Is this enough for continuation of popular pages? Thanks in advance! --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter |WhiteWriter ]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 21:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks for the notice, I've updated the bot's information. <span style="font-family:Broadway">[[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.]][[User talk:Mr.Z-man|'''''Z-'''man'']]</span> 21:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks for the notice, I've updated the bot's information. <span style="font-family:Broadway">[[User:Mr.Z-man|Mr.]][[User talk:Mr.Z-man|'''''Z-'''man'']]</span> 21:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

== thank you ==

I started discussion there, and then I wrote how I was wrong and that the number of protections is actually not that high, but some users do like to argue about nonsense. Thanks for ending it. [[Special:Contributions/188.2.160.70|188.2.160.70]] ([[User talk:188.2.160.70|talk]]) 23:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:31, 23 December 2010


Nomination of Clyde Lucas for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Clyde Lucas, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clyde Lucas (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Reftools dates

The dates aren't showing correctly ([1]) and I think it's because it used to be "|date= March 15, 2009" but now it's "date=10|month=October|year=2010". Marcus Qwertyus 22:17, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Emerging Technologies". 10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
So ... use "|date= March 15, 2009" instead? Mr.Z-man 00:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Marcus Qwertyus 17:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

When will Wikipedia:WikiProject Soviet Union/Popular pages and Wikipedia:WikiProject Socialism/Popular pages start working? The project says they have been added, but the have not been given their own wiki page yet. --TIAYN (talk) 17:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is answered in the FAQ. Mr.Z-man 18:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

refToolbar bug

Hello, I've localised refToolbar to the Finnish Wikipedia. In the making I found that there's a bug in User:Mr.Z-man/refToolbar_2.0/base.js. On the fifth last row

    row.append(check).append(' &ndash ').append(label);

it should probably read

    row.append(check).append(' &ndash; ').append(label);

or the browser (FF 3.6) does not show the intended dash. --hydrox (talk) 22:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed Thanks for pointing this out. Mr.Z-man 23:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. While I am at it, I could also point out that I found some usability bugs with the code as well:
  • Detecting references with same content does not seem to work.
  • Detecting for usage of named references that are not found does not seem to work.
  • After runnning the error check on the page, I can not open the list of named references anymore before reloading the page.
A quick fix would be to allow hiding the error checker altogether from CiteTB.Options until the bugs are fixed, as it is not that necessary feature. --hydrox (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How come you can't view the popular pages for December? http://toolserver.org/~alexz/pop/view.php Kaldari (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The setup script failed. I fixed it and re-ran it. The table is rebuilding now. I'll take a few days to catch up. Mr.Z-man 04:06, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some time ago I made a request to get a popular pages list for WP:SPACEFLIGHT, and it doesn't seem to have worked. This may because our assessment categories are inconsistently named, slightly; the WikiProject's category is Category:WikiProject Spaceflight articles, but the assessment categories are with lowercase "s", such as Category:B-Class spaceflight articles. Is this the problem? Should we rename the categories? thanks, Mlm42 (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is answered in the FAQ. Mr.Z-man 00:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What a mysterious reply.. I assume you mean the answer to why the page hasn't been created yet. That doesn't exactly answer my question: "Should we rename the categories?", but I'll assume from your response the answer is "no". sorry for taking your time, Mlm42 (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please create a list of popular pages for Slovenia too? Thanks a lot. --Eleassar my talk 10:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

Just to tell you, we renamed the wikiproject, from Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance to Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia. And per that, Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Property of Great Importance/Popular pages has been moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia/Popular pages. Is this enough for continuation of popular pages? Thanks in advance! --WhiteWriter speaks 21:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, I've updated the bot's information. Mr.Z-man 21:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

I started discussion there, and then I wrote how I was wrong and that the number of protections is actually not that high, but some users do like to argue about nonsense. Thanks for ending it. 188.2.160.70 (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]