User talk:Mr.Z-man/Archive 16
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mr.Z-man. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list
Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
closeAFD.js - relisting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of America?
I relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of America? and when pressing Reload page was brought to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of America. Could the question mark be triggering this? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Possible bug in RefToolbar preventing autofills from working
Hello, I have found what I think might be a bug in RefToolbar's code that prevents the autofill button from working unless there is at least one incremental field present in the form. Please see my description of the problem at Wikipedia_talk:RefToolbar#Autofill_not_initiating_in_absence_of_incrementables. Thank you --Blahma (talk) 12:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
User:Mr.Z-bot's working and other doubts
Hi! I understand that User:Mr.Z-bot compiles and updates various "popular pages" stats (eg. Wikipedia:WikiProject Retailing/Popular pages). Am not getting from where does the bot compile this information? Further I wanted to know how the page view states even works? Like does it count only external non-logged in readers or can editors also influence the page view count? Means for example if an article is under dispute for some reason it would automatically catch more editors and would this also increase the "popularity" ranking of that page?
I don't even know if you are right person to ask these things. If you are not, please direct me to someone else you think might answer. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Popular pages page
Thank you for maintaining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Popular pages page, but then could you also add a fields Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Wikipedia 1.0/Fields collumn to the page. (also sortable so that can every now and then I can have a look at the most popular pages in a particular field of mathematics.
PS this is just a private opinion, there has not been a discussion in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics that agrees or disagrees with my standpoint. so possibly later you will get a request to remove the field collumn again. If you prefer that we first discuss it, please let me know. but then is it possible how i would like it? WillemienH (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Future of Mr.Z-bot tasks
Hey Alex, it looks like you might have retired from Wikipedia. I was just wondering if you could chat about the tasks currently performed by Mr.Z-bot and whether or not you would be interested in handing those off to other maintainers, or just adding extra maintainers so that other people can help keep them up to date and add new features to them (like adding mobile stats to the popular page reports and Citoid support to the RefToolbar API). Let me know if you have any thoughts about this. Cheers! Ryan Kaldari (WMF) (talk) 00:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Not quite retired, just on an extended break. But some additional help with bots/tools would certainly be appreciated. Mr.Z-man 01:32, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Glad to hear you haven't retired! The Community Tech team is interested in possibly improving a couple of your tools (see T112569 and T114156). If we decided to pursue making these improvements, would you prefer that we fork your Github repos and make pull requests or would you rather add other people as contributors to the repos so that they could work on the code directly? Also, would you be interested in adding other people as co-maintainers for your Tool Labs projects? Ryan Kaldari (WMF) (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Excellent :-) Would be exceedingly nice to have mobile without the numbers your tool produces. And for it to function in other languages. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
- Adding people as contributors and co-maintaners would probably be easiest. Mr.Z-man 22:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- That's fine by me. If you'd like to go ahead and add me to any projects, my username on both GitHub and Tool Labs is Kaldari. You can add project maintainers on Tool Labs from http://tools.wmflabs.org/ and can add contributors on GitHub via [1]. We can involve you as much or as little as you would like in discussing feature changes and bug fixes. Ideally, we would like to make your life easier and the tools better :) Ryan Kaldari (WMF) (talk) 01:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, I've added you to the reftoolbar and popularpages projects on Tool Labs and Github, as well as the commonphp Github, which generates the HTML template for the web tools. Mr.Z-man 03:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- That's fine by me. If you'd like to go ahead and add me to any projects, my username on both GitHub and Tool Labs is Kaldari. You can add project maintainers on Tool Labs from http://tools.wmflabs.org/ and can add contributors on GitHub via [1]. We can involve you as much or as little as you would like in discussing feature changes and bug fixes. Ideally, we would like to make your life easier and the tools better :) Ryan Kaldari (WMF) (talk) 01:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Glad to hear you haven't retired! The Community Tech team is interested in possibly improving a couple of your tools (see T112569 and T114156). If we decided to pursue making these improvements, would you prefer that we fork your Github repos and make pull requests or would you rather add other people as contributors to the repos so that they could work on the code directly? Also, would you be interested in adding other people as co-maintainers for your Tool Labs projects? Ryan Kaldari (WMF) (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Request pageview statistics for WikiProject for a longer period of time
Hi! Is it possible to get WikiProject Popular pages lists data not for just a month, but for longer period of time? Qwemaze (talk) 17:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Electronic Recycling Association AfD
Hi Mr.Z-man. There's something wrong with (the browser rendering) of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Recycling Association. It is blank in two different browsers, but it works as a preview when editing it. I had a quick look to debug it, the rendering broke with the close edit [2] but further work would involve editing a closed AfD (possibly multiple times) hence me asking you if it's a quick fix for you? (If it helps, the top looks ok, comparing with another AfD there's no {{ns:0|O}} in the middle, so it's likely the bottom) If you need any help, ping me and I'll copy to sandbox and debug it. Widefox; talk 13:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted AfD debates
Hi Alex, hope you're doing well. Sorry to bug you about more script things. Could you modify User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD2.js to remove Category:Relisted AfD debates and Category:AfD debates relisted 3 or more times on closure? Discussion is here and here. There will usually be wrapped in <noinclude>. I don't expect it to be too difficult – I can look into it if you prefer and suggest a diff (don't feel too comfortable making a substantial edit to the script directly). — Earwig talk 07:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Popular pages for an entire Wikipedia
Could your popular pages program be set up to run for the entire Haitian Creole Wikipedia? We're trying to revive it, and knowing which pages were read might be helpful. There are only 52K articles on the entire Wikipedia, and most of them have one or two sentences. I suspect that it would be enough to make a list of the 100 (rather than 1000) most popular pages. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
New URL lookup feature in RefToolbar
Hey Alex, I added a new URL lookup feature to RefToolbar. Now you can do an autofill with a URL in any of the template interfaces. It uses the Citoid API, which in turn uses Zotero. Feel free to tweak it further if you notice any issues. Kaldari (talk) 19:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Popular pages
Hi, it it possible to make pages like this[3] for other projects? FunkMonk (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
The Million Award
Heyo Mr.Z-man. Are you still interested for this? The project could use some help from Bots. Best, Yash! 07:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
WP:Jainism
Hey, I have applied for popular pages for WP Jainism months ago but haven't got it yet. Please have a look into the issue. Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 06:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- Providing a link to Wikipedia:WikiProject Jainism might be helpful.
- —Wavelength (talk) 15:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Bug in User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD
Hello, I just closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Station not stream outside Canada/US as delete using your script, only to find that it had ignored everything before the second forwardslash ("/") in the page name and so deleted US and all other redirects to United States (it probably would have deleted that page as well if I had Steward rights to delete a page with so many edits). It's rare for a page name to have a forwardslash, but it does happen, and it created a big mess to clean up in this case. Thanks for taking a look at it. postdlf (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- BTW, I'm going to cross post this to WP:VPT as I see you haven't been active in months. postdlf (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
afreporter
Hey there! I'm not convinced Mr.Z-bot is reporting abuse filter trips to AIV. Could you look into it? Thanks! — MusikAnimal talk 17:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- Also sent you an email — MusikAnimal talk 17:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ansh666 21:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for hard work :D
Junior5a (talk) 04:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Popular pages
Hi, I noticed that popular pages listings weren't generated for January and now it's March. Are these no longer going to be generated? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 11:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'd like to add that PP is a great service and I use it many times a week! I appreciate the hard work! -- DanielPenfield (talk) 13:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Wales - quick run?
Hi Mr.Z-man, I was wondering if it would be possible to do a one-time run of this for WikiProject Wales, a.s.a.p.? - They're having an editathon through April, and Dr. Blofeld requested the list at VPT, but I see that the service usually runs mid-month and is probably manually triggered, so I thought it worth a request. Thanks. :-) Quiddity (talk) 23:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Please see also User talk:Wavelength/Archive 4#Wikipedia:Lists of popular pages by WikiProject // Wales (March 2012).
—Wavelength (talk) 23:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- For anyone still waiting on this, you might want to track T141154 – the open ticket for WMF's community tech team to support the feature czar 23:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Mr. Z-bot -- unnecessary reports to WP:AIV
At Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2, there are currently three reports, two of which appear unnecessary -- for KatieEmoto (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and 63.92.248.233 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). What were the problems that triggered these reports by the bot? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Glitch when relisting with closeAFD2.js
Hi Alex. On occasion closeAFD2.js will skip hiding the AFD transclusion in the old log, ex.:
- 2016-09-05 17:05:38 - AFD relisted fine: Diff of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Stealth Productions (2nd nomination)
- No change in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 29
- 2016-09-05 17:05:40 - AFD transcluded fine in Diff of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 5
Thanks for the script. — Sam Sailor 08:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- The AFD was transcluded in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 29 as
{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep_Stealth_Productions (2nd nomination)}}
. Could the underscores be the culprit? — Sam Sailor 08:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Trim whitespace?
As somebody who closes a lot of AfDs, this is a really wonderful tool. Thanks for making it available! One suggestion, though. You should trim trailing whitespace from the closing comment. If I enter an extra newline at the end of my comment, when the signature is appended, it ends up going on a line by itself, resulting in it being set off as a code block, as in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/User:RoySmith/test_page_1. I do that surprisingly often. Trimming trailing whitespace would fix that. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Mr.Z-man. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Women's football task force
Hi Mr. Z-Man, This may be covered somewhere in the archives, but it's not quite clear to me. Is the Popular Pages tool still working? I've just realized that our group's page hasn't been updated since March and wanted to check with you. Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 21:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi Mr.Z-man.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Mr.Z-man. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Mr.Z-bot
Your bot usually updated the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Popular pages. For some reason, it doesn't update it since April. Can you help us? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:47, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- I noticed the same for WP Germany. Agathoclea (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Are you ok? Why did you leave us? We miss you and your bot :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:05, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Subpages portlet
// this adds a prefixindex function to find subpages of the current page. written by Mr.Z-man at my request
addOnloadHook( function () {
addPortletLink("p-tb", wgServer+wgArticlePath.replace("$1", "Special:PrefixIndex/"+wgPageName+"/"), "Subpages", "t-subpages", "See all subpages of this page");
});
Could you suss out why this isn't working anymore (doesn't show up in my sidebar)?
And perhaps, any idea why User:Js/urldecoder.js doesn't show up for me anymore either? –xenotalk 20:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, you appear to be on an extended break. Hope all is well. –xenotalk 20:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Xeno: Try using the below from my global.js instead. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
mw.loader.using( 'mediawiki.util', function () { $( document ).ready( function () { // Subpages of current page mw.util.addPortletLink( 'p-tb', mw.util.getUrl( 'Special:PrefixIndex/' ) + mw.util.wikiUrlencode( mw.config.get( 'wgPageName' ) + '/' ), 'Subpages', 't-subpages', 'Subpages of this page', null, '#t-recentchangeslinked' ); } ); } );
- @Xeno: Try using the below from my global.js instead.
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2011/Popular pages
Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2011/Popular pages, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2011/Popular pages and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2011/Popular pages during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 00:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Anatomy/Popular pages
Hi, Mr.Z-man! I noticed your contributions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Popular pages. I'm currently working on a research project that involves anatomy pages on Wikipedia. Is this list to be updated soon? Thank you in advance. --Athikhun.suw (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Athikhun.suw: See T153790. Kaldari (talk) 21:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Athikhun.suw: It has now been updated. Kaldari (talk) 00:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for notifying! --Athikhun.suw (talk) 00:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kaldari: - Is it possible to also update Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Popular? Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 01:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
MfD nomination of MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-largeaddition-notice
MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-largeaddition-notice, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-largeaddition-notice and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-largeaddition-notice during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Problem with User:Mr.Z-man/moverevert2.js
Hi, I have blanked this script for now, as it is no longer up to date with current coding standards and was causing problem for people. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Geophotoreq tool seems to be out of date
Not sure if you're still actively supporting the tool (https://tools.wmflabs.org/geophotoreq/), but it was returning articles for me that had had their photo requests removed up to two year ago. Not sure if you're using an out of date data dump or what, but I figured you might be interested to know. No hard feelings from me if you don't want to support the tool anymore though. Thanks! Brubsby (talk) 20:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux Talk 00:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
You are missed
Hey Mr.Z just letting you know that you are missed here. Hope all is well and to see you back one day :-) Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at User talk:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD
For any WP:TPSs:
You are invited to join the discussion at User talk:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD#RFC: redirect to XFDcloser?. Evad37 [talk] 09:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Bludgeon band
New to listing. DON'T understand why you delited my band...we started in early 90s and have played all over and have a cd Victoria Decay (talk) 01:14, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Last eruption listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Last eruption. Since you had some involvement with the Last eruption redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
BAG inactivity
Hello Mr.Z-man, long time no see! Please see Wikipedia_talk:Bot_Approvals_Group#Inactive_BAG_retirement_(Mr.Z-man) regarding the new automatic retirement process that will impact you from WP:BAG membership. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 00:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Due to your lengthy inactivity, you have been moved to the "former" list of WP:BAG should you return and wish to re-join BAG please start a discussion at WT:BAG. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 14:31, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Looking for your opinion on my RefToolbar proposal
Ylevental (talk) 16:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Notice of inactive bot
Hello, as both your bot account and your main account have been inactive for two or more years, your bot account will be moved to retired. No action is required on your part. Should you wish to reactivate your bot in the future please request authorization at WP:BRFA. Should you need to maintain your bot status now, please review and reply to this section at the Bots Noticeboard: Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Inactive bots - May 2019. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 03:32, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
Ten years! |
---|
We miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
... same today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 25 October 2019 (UTC)