User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:14, 14 March 2011

11:29 pm, 8 September 2024 (PDT)

Important: This talk page is becoming very boring. Please consider leaving hilarious knock-knock jokes so as to spruce things up a little. Thanks!

Wikipedia:Don't Feed the Divas

Our environment, the world in which we live and work, is a mirror of our attitudes and expectations.

Wikimood

[purge]	[edit]

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32

Christmas Card

User:DeltaQuad/Christmas2010

Re: Restoring a personal attack

I was merely signing comments per WP:SIG. Since it was a specifically unprotected talk page established by the editor, I thought it was better if he would be able to review it himself. Obviously, the other editor whose changes I reverted (and who subsequently reverted my own change) did not agree, and I left it at that. --RoyalFool (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is only curiosity...

...but having spent some time counselling what I thought was a newbie, I would be interested to know the background to this, if there is anything you can tell me, by email if necessary. JohnCD (talk) 23:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are not a newbie, but anyways

email sent. Tiptoety ^talk 04:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is related. I don't know (and don't want to know) the background, so feel free to reblock if necessary. Cheers. lifebaka++ 16:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks. Dealt with. Tiptoety ^talk 16:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also this one, brought to my attention at AN/I. Cheers. lifebaka++ 15:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tiptoety ^talk 16:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michoball

Hey. Just a quick heads-up: on that case, you listed Uceify3487 - but that's not an account. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 23:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops.

fixed. Tiptoety ^talk 23:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My ArbCom case/evidence

There is so much material here, and so much misunderstanding and misrepresentation that it would be unfair to expect me to stick to the 1000 word limit, to enable me to give an adequate rebuttal; I would ask for a relaxation of the norms here, to allow the issues to be properly aired. If you propose to edit my input, I'd be glad if you would discuss it first. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 01:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually just thinking about this myself. I'm happy to allow you to go over the 1000 word limit but would ask that you place things into collapse boxes. Does that sound fair? Tiptoety ^talk 04:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the proposal that the email exchanges be placed on a separate, linked, subpage, has some merit. My worry is that doing that tends to hide information away from view, and that is the last thing I would wish to achieve. It is of paramount importance in this case that the community has full, unfettered access to all the evidence, voluminous though it may turn out to be. That's only to be expected, however, when so much has been done so incorrectly, and full visibility should be encouraged. Rodhull andemu 04:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but I'm afraid that as of right now some of your content is more threaded discussion than evidence. Please see my comment on the /Evidence talk page. Thanks, Tiptoety ^talk 17:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk

Hi there Tiptoety, I am interested in clerking, and I would like to know a little bit more about it. (I am not yet interested in becoming one, I just would like to learn a little bit about the procedures) PaoloNapolitano (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PaoloNapolitano. Thanks for your interested in ArbCom clerking. The role of the clerks is to assist the Arbitrators in the maintenance of ArbCom matters so to speak. We are tasked with open cases, ensuring word count, length, and other guidelines are being followed as well as posting notices/announcements to WP:ACN. Most of our work is conducted on a mailing list, but some work is done at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks. For more information, you may want to take a look here. Hope that helps, Tiptoety ^talk 17:49, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi Tiptoety, Thanks for giving me the rollback right. Thanks. --Ankit Maity 08:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Friend of yours?

I just indef'd Tipteoty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows, they are editing from a library terminal. Thanks though, Tiptoety ^talk 21:07, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

email

Hello, Tiptoety. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

*** in fact *** ( contact ) 07:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hielmann SPI

Just left you a note on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hielmann. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 15:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lapsed Pacifists Block

Hi, I see you blocked LP and recorded it at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lapsed Pacifist but he was actually in violation of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lapsed Pacifist 2 (Yeh they have two arbcom cases!) though on a related point I think he may have violated the first case here! G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 17:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another fan of yours

Hello Tiptoety, a user uncovered defamatory remarks targeted towards you on images he was viewing on wapedia; please see here. I'm at a loss as to how to remove them, and those remarks aren't present on their corresponding Commons files. I thought I'd let you know since you're being targeted. Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 19:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Knock knock

Knock knock.... Syn 13:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 Hello Tiptoety, a user uncovered defamatory remarks targeted towards you on images he was viewing on wapedia; please see [[User_talk:Airplaneman#Photographs|here]]. I'm at a loss as to how to remove them, and those remarks aren't present on their corresponding Commons files. I thought I'd let you know since you're being targeted. Regards, [[User:Airplaneman|<span style="color:blue;size=2">Airplaneman</span>]][[User talk:Airplaneman|<span style="color:#33dd44;size=2">  ✈</span>]] 19:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
+== Knock knock ==
+Knock knock.... '''[[User:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Sy</font>]]'''[[User_talk:Synergy|<font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">n</font>]] 13:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)