User talk:Omar-Toons

Hello,

You are on my talk page, please don't forget to sign your message by typing (~~~~).

Please, don't insert your comments in the middle of other users' ones, start a new section or add your message below other users' ones in an already existing section.

Thanks!

Omar

Your 3RR report

Hi. There is a special board, WP:ANEW, for 3RR and edit-warring reports, and I have moved your report there. It's now at WP:ANEW#User:Bokpasa reported by Omar-Toons (talk) (Result: ). Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

History of Morocco

Hello, Thank you for protecting the article History of Morocco. However, I have another request: Can you please lock it on the version that was online [1] before the editwar started [2]? As you can see on the discussion page[3], this is not happening for the first time, but always involving the same user. The maps on the article are original research and non-sourced and they contain false information example. The given information is also non-sourced and in contradiction with all the sources and references (see [4]). I'm just asking you to lock the article on the less untrue version. Regards, Omar-Toons (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

If a page is protected due to a content dispute, it is customary to protect the version that is currently on top, unless this version contains vandalism, copyright infringements or violations of the BLP policy (See Wikipedia:Protect#Content_disputes). Since this version seems to contain neither i am reluctant to switch the top version. Remember, protection a certain version is not an endorsement of that version, but rather a necessity to stop the edit war.

I advice starting a discussion on the talk page to form consensus on the topics you mentioned, including the usage of those maps in general. If i have a section showing clear consensus i can act upon that basis once a user enters an edit war that does not comply with that consensus. If a user refuses to comment on the talk page and continues his reverting behavior that is considered to be disruptive, which in itself is a reason for a (temporally) block. Try to work something out in the three days the article will be locked and remember - the protection lasts three days, consensus lasts a lot longer - So don't worry about the top version. If you cannot find consensus yourself i would point to DR for some assistance with it. Good luck! Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Western Sahara

Hi Omar, even if your movement might be sensible in some way, you'd better discuss it before doing such an extreme movement. I understand that we have to be bold, but your edition may be seen as POV as the one you supposedly wanted to remove. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Fine, I don't personally have a strong opinion (well, in fact a wikiproject on Western Sahara seems fine to me... but tying it to the Polisario claim is obviously POV). Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Template:ESH

Please see WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD). You made a bold edit, it was reverted, and now is the time for discussion, not edit-warring. Make your case on the talk page, or start an RfC if you want, but you do not have consensus right now for your edit. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

re: United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories

Well, on one hand, I just tried to use different wording to make the paragraph better. On the other hand, the very concept of military occupation is more related to a regular Army and a regular State. That's not the case (even if they wish) of the Polisario and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic. That was my only rationale. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Bokpasa at commons

Hi Omar, give me some time (even in Spanish, the speech by Bokpasa is awful). --Ecemaml (talk) 22:05, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Here you have it (more or less, as I told you, his Spanish is also awful):

Hi! I don't know what you mean about me uploading false maps with wrong information (with low historical quality). If you want to locate such cities, don't write "Morocco", as it didn't exist in that date, and include other cities. The article was written by you and in other page you deny [the existence of] the other Republic... If you keep on including false maps, I'll raise a report to the administrators. You don't like to suffer what you do to other people, do you? Thank you!

Hope it helps. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 21:52, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. On the other hand, may I suggest you to open a deletion request for the two article on the saadite kingdoms? Bokpasa has been unable to provide any reliable source yet, so I think it's time to follow the procedure. See you --Ecemaml (talk) 10:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Why didn't you add new figures instead of erasing mine?

So, if you know that the article on Berber people in Frecnch has "better" sources than Joshua Project; why don't you add the new figures shown in those sources, instead of just erasing the ones I added? It's easier to destroy than to construct, did you know? --Pablozeta (talk) 14:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Restored bibliography on Ahmed Belbachir Haskouri

That sounds like a good plan. I had already done the Bibliography formatting work, that's why I put it back after your work removing stuff. -Colfer2 (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

we need to talk. any reason why u do not want ahmed belbachir here even if it is properly cited? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaskouri (talk • contribs) 18:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Omar-Toons. You have new messages at Chipmunkdavis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just tell me if you're watching my page! :) Chipmunkdavis (talk) 15:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Omar-Toons. You have new messages at Chipmunkdavis's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(Berber people) Page

Omar-Toons, you have removed, other Berber names from the legend (Berber People Page) twice.

It is clear that all the Legend images are all Kabyles and Rifian ( The legend is not (neutral) or exact representation of all the Berbers of north-Africa

your are missing the Atlas Berbers of Morocco.

(Add some or any)

Ammouri Mbarek Fatima Tabaamrant Lhaj Belaid Usman (Ammouri Mbarek, Said Bijaaden, Tarik El-maarufi, Belaid el-Akkaf, Lyazid Qorfi, Said Butrufin) Ali Chouhad Rkia Demsir Omar Ait Ulahyan Najat Aatabou Fatima Tachtoukt Yuba Cherifa Mohamed Rouicha Saïda Titrit

If no one can Add a represenation of (Moroccan Atlas berbers, Middle-Atlas, High-Atlas and Little Atlas) then the Legend Image should be removed from page.

(Amezwaru (talk) 23:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC))

Hello,

As you can easily see it, the infobox (and specially the pictures it contains) doesn't make a difference between Riffians, Kabyles Tuaregs and so on, the article is about Berber people (in general), and the pictures are the ones of well known Berbers, that's all.

In addition, as you say it by yourself: It is a "legend" (Template:Fr:Légende): That means that it refers to the pictures above, explaining what (or whom) each picture refers to, then adding names without pictures is absurd.

On the other hand, the people you are suggesting to add aren't notable. Maybe they are notable in a small scale, locally, but I don't think they have their place here. From your list, I only recognise two names (Rouicha and Ataabou), and they have (far) less notability than Khattabi or Idir, sorry to tell you that even if you are a fan of them.

You can add your list to the page List of Berbers.

Removing the infobox because of your considerations could be considered as vandalism.

Omar-Toons (talk) 23:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Omar,

Do you have a ref for your statement "These languages are considered as separate by the IRCAM (politically) and scholars (socio-linguistically)"? I added that to Atlas languages, but it was deleted as unreferenced.

(PS. I'm not watching this page, so please reply there or on my talk page.) — kwami (talk) 08:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Joshua Project

Hi, I was involved in an edit fight with a user User:Takabeg who uses the Joshua Project as a source on Turkish people. Can you help me by stating that Joshua Project is unreliable? Kavas (talk) 02:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, again! User:Takabeg stopped using this website as a source. However, it is still helpful if you share your idea about this website. Kavas (talk) 02:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Almoravids and Almohads

Omar-Toons, I started a real work on the dynasties before and after the Almoravid dynasty [5] and Almohad Caliphate [6], why have you done this: [7], [8] without any respect for the time I spent to organise the articles. I waited for an answer to my posts on the Talk Pages [9], [10], but you did not discuss. Whould you finally decide to discuss or cotinue your edit-wars ?--Morisco (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello,

As you can easily understand, en.WP doesn't work the same way than fr.WP, then what was decided there isn't applicable here.

A "real work"? Seriously, do you consider that and that a "real work"? You just removed a template and added an extensive succession list, which may be not precise, since it consider that the territory of each dynasty was divided at the time of its falling, but the reality is that each dynasty lost, at the end of its power, its territories the one after the other, and kept control over a little territory (which is located in Morocco), before getting power overtaken by its successor starting form the same territory (Morocco). The paragraphs "History" of each dynasty's page as well as the page "History of Morocco" explains everything.

Which kind of "answer" are you expecting on the discussions? Seriously, did you wrote any question? Did you ask for a discussion? You just shared your point of view with us [11]. You just said that you think that this template has no place on the article. No questions, no arguments. And how do you think people can read/find a question that you wrote somewhere in the middle of the discussion page [12]?

The "History of Morocco" template is available on many WP's (including English and French ones), all include the Almohads and the Almoravids, but you don't agree with that, in my opinion, since it doesn't match your POV!

Just to answer to a few questions:

- Where were located the "centers of power" (capitals) of these dynasties? In Morocco.

- From where did they start the conquest of other territories? From Morocco.

- Which was the last territory that they controlled while they were collapsing? Morocco.

- How came to power the dynasties who reigned after? By taking their places in Morocco (That also explains the succession tab on the infobox).

- They were originated from somewhere else? Then the US are no longer the same than before since the president is partially originated from somewhere else? Come on! Most European monarchies are ruled by dynasties that aren't of "local descent". Is that a reason to consider that the Bourbon dynasty isn't Spanish? Bonaparte conquered the Dutch, is that a reason to consider it as a European leader, and not a French one? The answer is NO. By the same way, the Almohad and Almoravid dynasties are Moroccan, and I don't see any reason to consider them otherwise.

I just gave you some examples. If you don't agree, try to convince the user who made these templates to remove the two dynasties, as well as the wikipedians who wrote these two articles, since including this template (along with the "History of Al-Andalus" one, but I don't understand why this one was removed) was accepted (then became a consensus between the users, since no one removed it or discussed its removing, and since the users who (tried to) discuss it weren't contributors) for more than 2 years.

I don't really care about the nationalistic feelings. WP is a collaborative Encyclopedia, not a forum to explain nationalistic feelings and to modify articles because of them.

Omar-Toons (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I will move the discussion towards the respective pages of each article to allow other contributors to join our discussion.--Morisco (talk) 16:25, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Mutliple Spellings of Tariq on Tariq ibn Ziyad

The different spelling of the name 'Tariq' are important to note, as there are multiple English spellings. At the start there are two spellings already - 'Tariq' and 'Taric', so why remove the others?

eg. The name Tariq can also be written as Tarique, Tarik or Tarek.

Either I'll reinsert them, or you can. Up to you.

tnaseem (talk) 08:46, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

per WP:NPOV on Western Sahara : The territory's CoA and Flag

Hello,

Since Western Sahara is a disputed territory, redirecting the two pages Flag of Western Sahara and Coat of arms of Western Sahara to the SADR's ones is clearly PoV. I'm sorry to tell you that I will revert any PoV edition on these articles, for both Morocco and Polisario oriented PoV.

Neither the Moroccan flag and coat of arms are WS's ones, neither are Polisario/SADR's ones ; this is the basis of Neutrality on an article related to a disputed territory.

Omar-Toons (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Again, the dispute is irrelevant, only naming conventions and disambiguation are relevant. When people check Wikipedia for the 'flag of Western Sahara' or the 'coat of arms of Western Sahara', they simply will not ever be looking for the flag or coat of arms of Morocco, ever, ever, ever. They'll search for 'flag of Morocco' and 'coat of arms of Morocco' for those, and will find them. When searching Wikipedia for the 'flag of Western Sahara' and the 'coat of arms of Western Sahara', a person will always, always, always be looking for the emblems associated with the POLISARIO. People also do not look up information on flags hoping for an outline of what is clearly more appropriate and already covered in other articles. There is no getting around it.

You can of course continue to attempt to change the redirects, but I encourage you to be aware that the following will be against any such action:

1. Wikipedia policy on article titles.
2. Wikipedia guidelines on disambiguation.
3. Seven years of status quo. (And 3.5 years, or 10.5 years collectively.)
4. Many others having tried and failed.
5. That you are Moroccan, and are indisputably biased from birth.

The last thing this wiki needs is yet another "article" by a Moroccan outlining who controls what in Western Sahara; we already have the articles Western Sahara, Morocco, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, Legal status of Western Sahara, and likely a majority of articles created by anyone associated with Wikipedia:WikiProject Morocco and Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Sahara to cover that particular issue. Articles about flags can remain about flags.

¦ Reisio (talk) 22:33, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Flags and coats

Could the two of you please discuss this on one of the "public" talkpages rather than making this some spread-out private discussion? thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 21:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

RfC: X of Western Sahara

RfC on that NPOVN thing is here. Nightw 03:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

User:HCPUNXKID

Just my opinion but you should report this on the admin noticeboard, I see that editors have given him/her many chances now and there was even discussion on another editor's talk page with HCPUNXKID that if this continues he/she may be blocked. I am really an outside editor on this so I do not want to report this myself. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

• • Reply: If the user reverts again I will go ahead with it, I just want this disruptive edit warring to stop over this as it has been days now. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

There is also a discussion going in at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents under "Deletion of POV and Unbalanced tags without discussion". You can maybe explain the situation there too. TL565 (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

On the issue of the article 2010–2011 Sahrawi protests, you should report him at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring as he clearly violated the 3RR. TL565 (talk) 18:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

MENA protests Western Sahara/Morocco flagicon

Hi, you replied to me on Talk:2010-2011 Middle East and North Africa protests, about why Mohamed Lamine Ould Salek Ould Said Mahmoudi (the only victim of self immolation to not have a flag as listed on the page). I still have a question: if I add the Sahrawi flag alone to his section on the page (as he is from Smara in Western Sahara), will that be deleted too? Thanks, and please reply on my talk page. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 22:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Since it is the flag of the SADR, which is one of two claimants of the territory, yes it will be deleted because it will be considered as PoV. Same if you add the flag of Morocco.

There are two solutions that can be considered as NPoV: Letting the line without flag or adding the "hybrid" flag.

Omar-Toons (talk) 23:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I added a 20px hybrid flag, only because too me the line doesn't look right without a flag. Thanks buddy. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 00:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles concernant le Sahara occidental

bonsoir, je vous suggére d'inviter le maximum d'utilisateurs marocains pour intervenir sur les articles concernant le Sahara Occidental, ainsi que sur certaines pages de discussion. Pour information l'utilisateur Ecemaml avec lequel tu échanges des messages est un administrateur dans la Wikipedia Espagnole, lui et ses amis ont converti cette wikipedia en un véritable lieu de dénigrement du Maroc et de ses institutions, et à chaque fois que quelqu'un essaie de changer quelque chose il est soit bloqué pour vandalisme soit ils bloquent l'article pour plusieurs mois afin d'empêcher sa modification (voir sa page de discussion ou je lui ai fait la remarque). Autre chose, certains utilisateurs provenant de l'amérique Latine dont un Uruguayen de pseudo Maurimanya n'ont aucun travail à faire sauf d'insérer des informations anti-marocaines sur les pages concernant le sahara occidental. Sinon je vous invite à participer dans la page de discussion du sahara occidental en Anglais ou on discute s'il faudrait ou pas mentionner que le Maroc est l'état nation qui a demandé de mettre le sahara occidental dans la liste des territoires à décoloniser. bonne journée. --Yusuf ibn Tashfin (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)