Talk:St John's Jerusalem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:27, 19 May 2011

St John's Jerusalem is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Bobadillaman (talk) at 16:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Kent Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Middle Ages Start‑class

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Architecture Start‑class

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

There are a number of uncited statements on the main page which if unverified should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobadillaman (talk • contribs) 16:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better photo please

Can anyone please supply a better photo, i.e. of the facade, if possible? (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I've had a pretty good trawl on Wikimedia Commons and other acceptable sources on the internet, but my efforts have thus far come to nothing. If I get a chance to visit the property again in the near future, I will be sure to take such a photograph. In the mean time, I hope another user may be able to supply one. Stellas4lunch (talk) 18:12, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try and pop around this weekend but unfortunately I am not acquainted with the current occupier and I have heard that out-of-season visitors can get a rather stormy reception.Bobadillaman (talk) 18:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From all accounts, such as Greaves, the present occupier is charming (although I do not know him well personally) and I'm sure would not object to an out of hours visit, provided, of course, that the weather was of an acceptable quality. Stellas4lunch (talk) 20:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crusader Nights film

(Also in reference to R v Brownhouse) I was wondering whether anyone had a copy of the film filmed on the site, Crusader Nights, in order that I might watch it for research purposes to create its own page given its historical, legal and artistic significance?Bobadillaman (talk) 20:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Ah I managed to find a copy on an online which I've purchased. Set me back £150 though. Once it's arrived I'll work on creating a wiki article. Bobadillaman (talk) 16:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"The building was controversially used in 1994 as one of the sets for G. Brownhouse's adult film Crusader Nights, which was the first such film to integrate archive footage from The Crusades.[15]" - I don't know what the writer was getting at with this statement, but I am quite certain that no video footage was taken during the Crusades. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.158.120.187 (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear, of course you are quite right to correct that ambiguity! I intended to refer to the footage which it includes from films on the Crusades and I shall adjust the page accordingly to remove the amusing anachronism. Bobadillaman (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muslims against Crusades

I have removed the meaningless pipe links to special air service and kangaroo courts - that is just comical Otherwise the citations provided do not link to articles and searches of the newspaper web sites result do not find anything - if you have something then show it

Without proper evidence this section will need to be deleted --Snowded ^TALK 20:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The pipe links are genuine errors and obviously the result of a lack of familiarity with the linking tool. Again, you are confusing ease of access to sources with verifiability contrary to WP:V. The point about the absence of internet sources has been made time and time again to you but you seem determined to ignore it. Moreover, you lack consensus for deletion, particularly in relation to the constitution of 'proper evidence'. Stellas4lunch (talk) 20:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:22, 19 May 2011 edit Snowded (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 37,619 edits →‎Muslims against Crusades: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:27, 19 May 2011 edit undo Stellas4lunch (talk \| contribs) 232 edits →‎Muslims against Crusades Next edit →
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Without proper evidence this section will need to be deleted --[[User:Snowded\|<font color="#801818" face="Papyrus">'''Snowded'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Snowded#top\|<font color="#708090" face="Baskerville">TALK</font>]]</sup></small> 20:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)		Without proper evidence this section will need to be deleted --[[User:Snowded\|<font color="#801818" face="Papyrus">'''Snowded'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Snowded#top\|<font color="#708090" face="Baskerville">TALK</font>]]</sup></small> 20:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
			:The pipe links are genuine errors and obviously the result of a lack of familiarity with the linking tool. Again, you are confusing ease of access to sources with verifiability contrary to [[WP:V]]. The point about the absence of internet sources has been made time and time again to you but you seem determined to ignore it. Moreover, you lack consensus for deletion, particularly in relation to the constitution of 'proper evidence'. [[User:Stellas4lunch\|Stellas4lunch]] ([[User talk:Stellas4lunch\|talk]]) 20:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)