User talk:Van Gulik: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:*The consonant cluster '''N'''P in '''ancient''' biblical texts (e.g. in the word לִנְפּוֹל i.e. Li'''N'''PoL - as appearing in Psalms), becomes '''P'''P in biblical '''prose''' (e.g. לִפּוֹל i.e. Li'''P'''PoL); |
:*The consonant cluster '''N'''P in '''ancient''' biblical texts (e.g. in the word לִנְפּוֹל i.e. Li'''N'''PoL - as appearing in Psalms), becomes '''P'''P in biblical '''prose''' (e.g. לִפּוֹל i.e. Li'''P'''PoL); |
||
:*In some well-defined phonetic conditions, the consonant H in '''ancient''' biblical texts, is omitted in biblical '''prose''' (e.g. the word בהשמים i.e. B'''H'''aSHaMaYiM - as appearing in Psalms, becomes בשמים i.e. BaSHaMaYiM - in the biblical prose texts); |
:*In some well-defined phonetic conditions, the consonant H in '''ancient''' biblical texts, is omitted in biblical '''prose''' (e.g. the word בהשמים i.e. B'''H'''aSHaMaYiM - as appearing in Psalms, becomes בשמים i.e. BaSHaMaYiM - in the biblical prose texts); |
||
:*And the like. |
:*And the like. |
||
:Anyways, I'm not sure whether one may call those phonetic phenomena "sandhi", unless one also calls the phonetic phenomena in English "snadhi", e.g. the phenomenon of adding the "e" (in "finish'''e'''s"), or of changing the "d" into "t" (in "a'''t'''tain"), and the like. |
|||
:[[Special:Contributions/77.127.87.159|77.127.87.159]] ([[User talk:77.127.87.159|talk]]) 19:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC) |
:[[Special:Contributions/77.127.87.159|77.127.87.159]] ([[User talk:77.127.87.159|talk]]) 19:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:46, 28 December 2011
Welcome!
|
Your signature
Hi. Per WP:SIGLINK, your signature should contain a link to your user page or user talk page - not Robert van Gulik, a mainspace article. Please change it. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:39, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello
On your userpage, you write: "Please notify me if any pages which you think I would be interested in are in need of attention". So, I think you might be interested in my response to your comment here. 77.124.12.169 (talk) 12:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. Are there any sandhi rules in biblical Hebrew? Do changes in vowel pointing constitute as 'sandhi'? Again, thank you for your response.Van Gulik (talk) 14:34, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- Not only changes in vowel pointing, but also changes in consonants. e.g.
- The consonants b,d,g,k,p,t, become v,the,gh,kh,f,thaw, after vowels (providing that those consonants are not "doubled");
- In some well-defined phonetic conditions, the consonant ת in Pre-biblical texts - becomes ט in biblical texts (e.g. in the word הִצְטַעֵר, and likewise);
- The consonant cluster NP in ancient biblical texts (e.g. in the word לִנְפּוֹל i.e. LiNPoL - as appearing in Psalms), becomes PP in biblical prose (e.g. לִפּוֹל i.e. LiPPoL);
- In some well-defined phonetic conditions, the consonant H in ancient biblical texts, is omitted in biblical prose (e.g. the word בהשמים i.e. BHaSHaMaYiM - as appearing in Psalms, becomes בשמים i.e. BaSHaMaYiM - in the biblical prose texts);
- And the like.
- Anyways, I'm not sure whether one may call those phonetic phenomena "sandhi", unless one also calls the phonetic phenomena in English "snadhi", e.g. the phenomenon of adding the "e" (in "finishes"), or of changing the "d" into "t" (in "attain"), and the like.
- 77.127.87.159 (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)