Talk:Project Chanology: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:01, 29 December 2011

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Project Chanology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Project Chanology. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Project Chanology at the Reference desk.

Project Chanology has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 28, 2008	Articles for deletion	Kept
February 13, 2008	Articles for deletion	Speedily kept
February 28, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
February 28, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
March 12, 2008	Good article reassessment	Listed
May 1, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
Current status: Good article

Scientology GA‑class Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture GA‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Media GA‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Additional Information

I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but source number 100 no longer exists at the cited web address. The original article has been removed from the LA times. Robotman666 (talk) 09:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC) (whoops didn't log in)[reply]

In the beginning our command center was irc.nintelligent.net (now defunct.) The rooms name was #CoSplay. The original admins of the first channel were named Banhammer, Hitlery, Moose, Anonicole, Notatripfag, and SAtempus.
I was Banhammer, the room owner. Our initial plans involved most of what is already listed (under "internet activities") however, we also had secondary rooms for our press releases/news room, propaganda, and blackops.
In our black ops room DDoS attacks were planned as a diversion to get in to their systems and wreak havoc... Among other, more malicious, things.
Propaganda was based more around posters and spreading the word.
Our news room was where many of the now well known videos/press releases were drafted and created.
We would often have upwards of 1000 people in the main irc channel at any given time during the day. admins had to mute all users just to get Basic information across, such as new video releases or attack dates/times.
I would have updated the main article, but this is anecdotal and not easily sourced.
someone, somewhere, might find this interesting or be able to source it correctly.
Hope someone enjoyed this before it was pruned. The more you know
--71.210.162.213 (talk) 00:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:01, 29 December 2011 edit 24.43.239.50 (talk) →‎Additional Information ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:01, 29 December 2011 edit undo Robotman666 (talk \| contribs) 10 edits →‎Additional Information Next edit →
Line 59:		Line 59:

	== Additional Information ==		== Additional Information ==
	I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but source number 100 no longer exists at the cited web address. The original article has been removed from the LA times. [[~~Special~~:~~Contributions/24.43.239.50~~\|~~24.43.239.50~~]] ([[User talk:~~24.43.239.50~~\|talk]]) 09:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)		I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but source number 100 no longer exists at the cited web address. The original article has been removed from the LA times. [[User:Robotman666\|Robotman666]] ([[User talk:Robotman666\|talk]]) 09:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC) (whoops didn't log in)