Talk:Graphene: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:03, 28 January 2012

Graphene was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 3, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Physics C‑class High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Graphene quantum dots - for consideration

For consideration for inclusion -- http://www.media.rice.edu/media/NewsBot.asp?MODE=VIEW&ID=16612&SnID=1949071651 and http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl2038979 --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SI Units Pleeaaassseeee

Can this article be edited so as to represent all quantities in SI units ? This will make the quantitative data more useable by a wider readership. Most scientists and engineers use SI units nowadays (and have done so for many decades).

I would also like to comment on the inappropriate metaphor 'honey comb'. A honey-comb is a 3 dimensional structure, while the graphene structure is 2-dimensional. This makes the metaphore misleading. The use of a metaphor is anyway unnecessary since a straight-forwardly factual description is readily available; simply describe the structure as a planar array of interlocking hexagons (benzene rings).

Andrew Smith

Archives (Index)
1 2