Talk:Tatu Vanhanen: Difference between revisions
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
That's a nice politically correct list; missing most of the major figures in psychometrics, but nice. |
That's a nice politically correct list; missing most of the major figures in psychometrics, but nice. - |
Revision as of 06:05, 25 February 2012
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Arbitration Ruling on Race and Intelligence The article Tatu Vanhanen, along with other articles relating to the area of conflict (namely, the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed), is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, described in a 2010 Arbitration Committee case where the articulated principles included:
If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the full arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Comment
I would would like to know more about him and his theories on modern democracy
IQ of Africans
IQ of Finns is probably correct, but IQ of Africans definitely can't be between 60-70, since that would make them imbeciles, or to precise, such claim would state that average African has mental capabilities equal to dumbest 2,5% of white people. I haven't yet read Vanhanen's books, but reference to those claims are definitely necessity in this context. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.162.101.122 (talk) 14:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- This isn't an article about the IQ of Africans, but an article about Tatu Vanhanen. All that is needed is a reference that verifies he made such a remark, which is already included. Whether it is true or not is irrelevant.--XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXO (talk) 22:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- If a child took an adult IQ test and scored far below the adult mean, would that mean that the child is an imbecile? No, it wouldn't. Crusty wallace (talk) 00:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to Human Intelligence
You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. It is especially important to get facts right in an article about a living person. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
That's a nice politically correct list; missing most of the major figures in psychometrics, but nice. -
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of scientists and academics
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Stub-Class Finland articles
- Unknown-importance Finland articles
- All WikiProject Finland pages