Jump to content

User talk:Caracas 2000: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Notification: tagging for deletion of File:Rafael Caldera -Miraflores, 1997.jpg. (TW)
Caracas 2000 (talk | contribs)
5,904 edits
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock|I´m sorry for what I did. I want another opportunity to make godd content, please}}



{{Archive box | [[/Archive 1]] }}
{{Archive box | [[/Archive 1]] }}
== [[Ciudad Bolivar]]==
== [[Ciudad Bolivar]]==

Revision as of 22:58, 9 March 2012

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Caracas 2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I´m sorry for what I did. I want another opportunity to make godd content, please

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I´m sorry for what I did. I want another opportunity to make godd content, please |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I´m sorry for what I did. I want another opportunity to make godd content, please |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I´m sorry for what I did. I want another opportunity to make godd content, please |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}


Ciudad Bolivar

This article was entirely plagiarized from mipunto.com (which is not a reliable source). I am concerned that you have created many similar articles. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:09, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Francisco Herrera Luque, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.anm.org.ve/FTPANM/online/2010/Coleccion_razetti/Volumen9/08.%20Clemente%20A%20(485-491).pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Francisco Herrera Luque saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This particular page turns out to have mirrored content from the Spanish Wikipedia, and it seems that you created the article as a direct translation of that page. While this is okay, Wikipedia's contents are not public domain either, and you do have to give proper credit to meet the licensing requirement. I've given it in this instance (See my edit summary here and the template here), but in the future please make sure that any pages you translate are attributed. Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia may clarify both how and why. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:49, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that Luis Britto García was also translated. I've fixed attribution for it as well. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Federico Vegas, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.relectura.org/cms/content/view/175/75/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Federico Vegas saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:49, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Herrera Luque.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Herrera Luque.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CCI

Hi.

First, I wanted to let you know that given that you had sooooo many bot notices on your page, I figured it might make it as hard for you to use as it was to me. I took the liberty of moving all your early notes to an archive at User talk:Caracas 2000/Archive 1. If this is unwelcome, please accept my apologies. I will fix it back the way it was if you want me to.

Second, I'm afraid I've uncovered a few more copyright issues where content was translated from an external sites: José María Vargas, Vinicio Adames and Tito Salas. I'm so very sorry, but I think you must not have known that under the United States law that governs us, we cannot copy or directly translate content from copyrighted sources to publish on Wikipedia. This is likely to be a violation of copyright law and is for that reason a violation of copyright policy. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Translations are what are called derivative works under U.S. law, and only the original copyright owner has the right to authorize them. While you can take information from copyrighted sources, you just can't use their words or structure - even if you change from Spanish to English - when placing it here.

Because it seems like a good many articles you've worked on may either need attribution notes to show they were translated from the Spanish Wikipedia or might need to be rewritten if they were translated from other sources, I have had to open a "contributor copyright investigation" (CCI) so that we could look at your articles more systematically. I understand this is likely to be quite a shock. You've worked very hard for a long time, and I'm sure you've intended only to be helpful. You've been very good at identifying your sources, so I think there can be no question that you simply did not realize that this wasn't permitted. I'm sorry that nobody noticed and explained to you much sooner.

I hope you will be willing to help fix some of these issues. It would be especially useful if you could help go through the list to identify the articles that you've copied from Spanish language Wikipedia. If these are fixed the way I described above, we can keep them without any further issues, so long as the Spanish article is not a copy of something else.

The CCI is located at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Caracas 2000. Whether you choose to help identify these articles or not, please keep an eye on that page if you are interested in seeing which articles are evaluated and found to be problems. You've already had a page full of templates. To avoid harassing you, we ask people who volunteer to help out with the CCI not to leave you anymore. But you can see from that list when an article has been evaluated and what has been done with it. If it says it has been blanked - like José María Vargas, Vinicio Adames and Tito Salas do - that means that you have about a week to rewrite them in your own language, or they might be deleted. Sometimes they will instead be reduced to stubs or somebody else might rewrite them.

If you have any questions about this, please let me know. I will be watching your talk page for a time, but you are also welcome to come by mine. Again, I'm very sorry that this situation has arisen. I hate to see contributors who have worked so hard and obviously intended no harm to run up against this issue, but as long as you are careful not to translate from unfree sources and to properly attribute any translations from other Wikipedias in the future, we should be able to get this work done and put it behind us. It may, however, take a while, as there is a backlog in that department and your case, which requires some ability with Spanish, may take a bit longer. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caracas 2000, I'm willing to help if needed (I'm sure you didn't intend for there to be a problem, but weren't aware that literal translation would be). The first step would be knowing which came from en.Wiki, so I can look at the others. Saludos, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Caldera 1era presidencia.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Caldera 1era presidencia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LHC nueva.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LHC nueva.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CAP primer mandato.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CAP primer mandato.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Marías, Sambrano Urdaneta and Caldera, 1997.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Marías, Sambrano Urdaneta and Caldera, 1997.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ramón y Rivera.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ramón y Rivera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Musica Folklórica y Popular cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caracas Cathedral

??? Your text: " The sacral art in the cathedral contains among others The Resurrection by Rubens, the Presentation of the Virgin by Murillo, and the Last Supper, an unfinished work by the Venezuelan painter Arturo Michelena."

Works by european painters Murillo or Rubens in that cathedral in Caracas  ? I can't believe that. Maybe copies but not originals. 92.252.11.252 (talk) 22:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rafael Caldera -Miraflores, 1997.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Rafael Caldera -Miraflores, 1997.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 08:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Caracas_2000&oldid=481079677"