Talk:Catching Fire: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Glimmer721 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
→Spell Checked: new section |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:I know. But it is reliable; it was in a magazine. It's just one opinion. --<font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Glimmer721|<font color="blue">Glimmer721</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Glimmer721|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</sup></font> 00:28, 10 October 2010 (UTC) |
:I know. But it is reliable; it was in a magazine. It's just one opinion. --<font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Glimmer721|<font color="blue">Glimmer721</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Glimmer721|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</sup></font> 00:28, 10 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Spell Checked == |
|||
I have spell checked the entire article. There were no spelling errors.[[User:KF5LLG|KF5LLG]] ([[User talk:KF5LLG|talk]]) 14:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:57, 25 March 2012
![]() | Novels: Sci-fi B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | Children's literature B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
Reviews?
Has anyone found out more reviews? We only have one. THat part of the article really needs improvement. --Glimmer721 (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Inaccurate article
Should the Entertainment Weekly article really be quoted here? It doesn't seem like a very reliable source. Almost every commenter on that page agrees that the reviewer doesn't seem to have read the book. - 131.229.158.89 (talk) 03:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- I know. But it is reliable; it was in a magazine. It's just one opinion. --Glimmer721 talk 00:28, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Spell Checked
I have spell checked the entire article. There were no spelling errors.KF5LLG (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC)