User talk:Kralizec!/Archive 2021: Difference between revisions
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012: new section |
|||
| Line 561: | Line 561: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0264 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0264 --> |
||
== Urgent Help and Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 is engaging in serious hacking activities, not just simple acts of vandalism in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias. == |
|||
Urgent Help and Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 is engaging in serious hacking activities, not just simple acts of vandalism in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias. |
|||
Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 registered to Oldham MBC public libraries, and which is permanently blocked in English Wikipedia since 2009, is the source of serious hacking activities. Today other vulnerable Wikipedia encyclopedias are under attack from this address where it is not blocked. This source is capable of hacking Wikipedia, as it is the case today in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias, because it has erased the history archives for instance in the [[Azerbaijan]] articles of the Wikipedia encyclopedias and is doing it in other country articles as well, which no simple vandal can do. This source is freely roaming and usurping right now. |
|||
Can anyone inform the administrators of the other Wikipedia encyclopedias and help them against the IP address, 212.121.219.1, because most of the small Wikipedia encyclopedias are vulnerable. |
|||
Revision as of 21:55, 14 May 2012
| Please either start a new section or add your message to the bottom of this page. Unless otherwise specified, I will generally respond on your talk page. |
| User talk:Kralizec! | → 2005 | → 2006 | → 2007 | → 2008 | → 2009 | → 2010 | → 2021 | ← present |
|---|
Talkback sink
Please drop all {{talkback}} type messages (aka "I have responded to your message on my own talk page") in this section. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message added 16:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Block of Meikeric
Excuse me for my inturruption good sir. My user, meikeric was just block by you for 72 hours. I wish to file a protest against this. I contributed valuable content to two articles. One being the Outer Banks article consisting of information on the seasonality of weather patterns on the Outer Banks due to it's geographical location as well as an external link to a site providing web cams of the Outer Banks. Both of this I feel is relevant and adds quality to this particular article. Unfortunately, I got into a revert war with CutOffTies, as she feels that the external link qualifies as spam. However, this page serves as a good resource to wiki users to get a live view of a place they are interested in that they may not think to search for through traditional sources. Honestly though, isn't this what the spirit of Wikipedia is about? Discovery of resources on the Internet. The other article was about the Wright Brothers National Memorial. I added an external link directly to a web can pointing directly at this memorial. Which I feel is highly relevant and interesting.
Therefore, I respectfully ask that my account be unbanned. However, if you feel that is not the correct action and I should continue to be blocked than I ask that CutOffTies be blocked for the same amount of time as a punishment for revert warring should be dolled out equally.
Thank you for your time, Meikeric —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.14.99 (talk) 22:38, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
...just vandalized my page again. What level warning is appropriate? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Nevermind. I see he just got blocked. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
| |||
File source problem with File:Dolza from Robotech Macross.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dolza from Robotech Macross.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 04:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
|
Nomination of season one episode articles of House for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Xeworlebi (talk) 12:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
Permission for image
Dear Sir/Madam I am currently in post production on feature film which cost us a total of $2000 it is super low budget and I humbly request the permission of a certain pic from your site because of the low budget nature of the film we only intend it to go into local festivals and can't realistically see it going into anything big, the certain pic is crucial to the plot and there is no other one that exists. Please consider this request as it would be much appreciated
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anbangbang_gallery_Mimi_rock_art_cropped.jpg
Andrew Salter Director/Producer Gloomy Sunday gizmo_enterprises@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.78.140 (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
rpg.net edits
Source supplied. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agoodbadhabit (talk • contribs) 02:16, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
|
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
|
Perimission request for le Code Chastenay
Hi,
My name is Gabrielle Lussier, I am a production coordinator for a Canadian science tv show entitled Le Code Chastenay. We air on the provincial public tv network, Tele-Quebec (the Quebec province equivalent of PBS) and world-wide on TV5 Monde. The show is also available on the show’s web site (telequebec.tv/lecodechastenay).
In our show, we have segments about quebec's scientific researchs where journalists explains a subject or phenomenon about science. In one of these segments, we would like to talk about twin's genetic. To illustrate the topic, we would like to show photographies of your children on air but there-for, we need your authorization.
We need to have the rights to broadcast photographies of your children. We are going to broadcast this segment during the year 2011 or in the beginnig of 2012. We need the rights to film it and reproduce it in the television program entitled "LE CODE CHASTENAY” in all formats necessary for its insertion into the Program and the Program's subsequent exploitation and promotion.
Our company shall have the right to authorize unlimited public representation of the Material for any broadcast and distribution use of the Program in whole or in part, in any form now in existence or which may come into use into the future, including interactive transmissions, in all markets worldwide, in perpetuity.
Of course, we will give you credits, in the end credits of the show.
I will need to send you our standard release form to sign if you can give us authorization to use the photos. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Thanks, -- Gabrielle Lussier Coordonnatrice de production Le Code Chastenay Productions Pixcom Inc Tél.: 1-514-931-1188 ext. 477 glussier@pixcom.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.41.93.242 (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
|
LOL
Little did u know that right after you requested CSOD on the Justin Bieber article....he would become an icon. LOL KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Kevin Coughlin
Salve, Kralizec! Could you help me keep an eye on Kevin Coughlin in the next few days? Someone has been adding poorly sourced allegations against Coughlin substantiated only by a local journalist's blog. The edits are reverted for now by another experienced editor, but it's probably something we'll want to watch. Thanks! -- JeffBillman (talk) 02:10, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
|
Fraternal twins
I'm new to wiki, so I hope I'm using this page correctly! I have noticed that your picture of fraternal twins shows what appears to be monozygotic twins. What evidence do you have that these twins are dizygotic? Has there been genetic testing? Thanks. Stickerella (talk) 19:28, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Twins
Hi! Thanks for your reply! I would say, with 99.99% certainty, that your twins are monozygotic (identical). Many ob/gyns and ultrasound techs are misinformed about twins, chorions, placentas, etc. They mistakenly believe that two placentas or amnions indicates fraternals, while it can be either. Clues can be found in the fingerprints, ear shape, irises, hair crowns, etc. With your twins, the outside observer can clearly see that they are monozygotic...they are quite obviously identical, though environment is slowly and gradually creating differences in the physical appearance. Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen, too, now understand that their physical differences do not mean they are fraternals, but mirror image twins (discussed on a recent episode of Ellen). It's just a misunderstanding that caused their mislabelling. Twins are fascinating! I do, however, think that there's a fair bit of misinformation about zygosity floating about, mostly caused by well meaning doctors who tell folks that their infants are fraternal or identical without genetic testing. Thanks for listening! Stickerella (talk) 17:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Soviet aircraft carrier Kiev (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unneccessary DAB page. Hatnotes now added to the two articles disambiguated here.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Haruth (talk) 19:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
|
Children's Museum backstage pass
| The Children's Museum Backstage Pass! - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis is hosting its second Backstage Pass and its first Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, August 20. The museum is opening its doors to Wikipedians interested in learning about the museum's collection, taking them on a tour of the vast collection before spending the afternoon working with curators to improve articles relating to the Caplan Collection of folk toys and Creative Playthings objects. Please sign up on the event page if you can attend, and if you'd like to participate virtually you can sign up on the Edit-a-Thon page. ---LoriLee (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Suggestion for WP United States to Support WP Oklahoma & Tulsa
 | This has been sent to you requesting that you share your thoughts to an ongoing discussion that's taking place on the projects talk page. |
The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
hi
Just want to know who this is. was researching my family history and i guess my GGGG grandfather started this town? hit me up...roller_zach@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.143.33.238 (talk) 00:51, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
User:Sczlep1
Revisiting an old block
This guy is appealing his block. Care to get involved? DS (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello there
I thought you might want to know that User:Sczlep1, who you blocked as a VOA back in 2009, is requesting an unblock and says he's grown beyond his previous antics. I'm inclined to believe him and unblock but thought I'd check with you, as the blocking admin, first. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Generally speaking, I fully support the rehabilitation of former vandals, and do not object in any way to the unblocking of this editor. — Kralizec! (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism on your User Page
Kralizec, I just wanted you to know that I reverted a blanking from an IP. It was pretty obvious vandalism, but in the remarkably slim chance that you weren't logged in and made that edit yourself, I apologize. Achowat (talk) 16:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:44, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Wikiproject Olahoma
 |
This has been sent to you requesting that you respond to whether or not you are still an active member of WikiProject Oklahoma Please respond Here By following the instructions. |
Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
File permission problem with File:Hocking River at Logan, Ohio.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hocking River at Logan, Ohio.jpg, which you've sourced to Dustin M. Ramsey. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 06:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Neither party was 'wasting time' in this - the note on the deletion is (I hope) a note to the restoring admin that there weren't any other issues with the image, it was just lacking the otrs ticket. Quite often there will be additional notes (like 'source needed', ORFUD, or other cryptic wikispeak stuff) that give a 'heads up' to other admins about the state of the image. Skier Dude (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Please correct the Jabiluka image
Hi Kralizec, I would like to compliment you on your good work, but would also like to ask if you would correct the name and description of your image of Jabiluka mine. You have named it Ranger 3 which it is not, Jabiluka is a separate lease currently controlled by the same company, but separate all the same. Also your description says that it is part of Kakadu National Park which it is not. It is surrounded by Kakadu as is the Ranger lease and mine, but both leases were created before the park and remain separate from it. Cheers, Owen Djapa Owen 22:34, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Update, since you did not have time to change this I put in a new image which I labelled correctly, so now nothing need be done. Djapa Owen 10:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
File:The Survivor Tree at the Oklahoma City National Memorial.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Survivor Tree at the Oklahoma City National Memorial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Dustin We have a website on Australia and would like to use your image titled......... Australian Aboriginal art rock painting of Mimi spirits in the Anbangbang gallery at Nourlangie in Kakadu National Park.......On our website and on a video..
We would attribute the work to you on the website as requested and would like to know if you would like a link to a website of yours or a particular page on Wikipedia? If so could you please provide the address to the site or page you would want the link back to..
Thanks Cheers Kim & Suzie Bell TheBellGirls — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBellGirls (talk • contribs) 02:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
MSU Interview
Dear Kralizeci,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
- Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
- Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
- All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
- All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
- The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:20, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Photo of Woodville
The photograph of Woodville on the Wikipedia site is actually looking Southwest, not Northeast as printed below the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.50.206.231 (talk) 23:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Java Scriptus
This user, whom you blocked in 2009, is asking for an unblock, claiming the alleged vandalism was a misunderstanding (it seems it could have been). He does not appear ever to have been warned about this, either. Could you take a look? Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Java scriptus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) continued to disruptively edit articles after receiving four escalating warnings. Those warnings do not appear on the user's talk page because it was deleted in March 2009. Given the nature of this person's edits (complete with false edit summaries) I am disinclined to believe his or her claims of ignorance, especially since the editor proceeded to do the exact same changes via 76.109.120.66 (talk · contribs · info · WHOIS) once the Java scriptus account was blocked (compare Java scriptus versus 76.109.120.66). — Kralizec! (talk) 21:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC) (original reply [1] copied from User talk:Daniel Case)
- Thanks; I have declined. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Abuse Filter on the Article Feedback Tool
Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.
For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:19, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Urgent Help and Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 is engaging in serious hacking activities, not just simple acts of vandalism in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias.
Urgent Help and Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 is engaging in serious hacking activities, not just simple acts of vandalism in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias.
Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 registered to Oldham MBC public libraries, and which is permanently blocked in English Wikipedia since 2009, is the source of serious hacking activities. Today other vulnerable Wikipedia encyclopedias are under attack from this address where it is not blocked. This source is capable of hacking Wikipedia, as it is the case today in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias, because it has erased the history archives for instance in the Azerbaijan articles of the Wikipedia encyclopedias and is doing it in other country articles as well, which no simple vandal can do. This source is freely roaming and usurping right now.
Can anyone inform the administrators of the other Wikipedia encyclopedias and help them against the IP address, 212.121.219.1, because most of the small Wikipedia encyclopedias are vulnerable.