Jump to content

User talk:The Bushranger: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reply
→‎LOL!: new section
Line 84: Line 84:
The IPS are changing the page. It's going to get worse after he wins.[[User:WilliamJE|...William]] 22:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
The IPS are changing the page. It's going to get worse after he wins.[[User:WilliamJE|...William]] 22:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
:Ouch. Protected for 12 hours (which should give him time to win the tournament I suppose!). - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub><font color="maroon">[[User talk:The Bushranger|One ping only]]</font></sub> 22:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
:Ouch. Protected for 12 hours (which should give him time to win the tournament I suppose!). - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub><font color="maroon">[[User talk:The Bushranger|One ping only]]</font></sub> 22:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

== LOL! ==

Your friend, Jayemd, is a crybaby! --[[User:Modern Warfare Dude|Modern Warfare Dude]] ([[User talk:Modern Warfare Dude|talk]]) 02:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:07, 13 August 2012

This editor is an Illustrious Looshpah and is entitled to display this Book of All Knowledge.

You may want to take a look at the history on his talk page. I just reverted his re-introduction to his talkpage of the article you blocked him for, and at the same time, he removed the block notice. Just my two cents, but you may want to consider revoking his talkpage editing ability. Regards, GregJackP Boomer! 22:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Conroy Virtus

Orlady (talk) 08:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for User:Amanda Paul/Paul Atherton

An editor has asked for a deletion review of User:Amanda Paul/Paul Atherton. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Amanda Paul (talk) 10:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could impose upon you to have a look at semi-protecting this article, as it has been recently subjected to multiple IP vandalism, all from Iranian IP addresses. Thank you for considering it. - Ahunt (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Protected for three days. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! - Ahunt (talk) 16:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I unarchived Peter Damian appeal

The ban was imposed by the community, although he was under arbcom sanction at the time. The community has the power to undo its own actions etc. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 18:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He's back

I think there's a duck quacking. Check this out[1] and this[2]. If it's another sock of our friend, he's managed to hide this one from us for a while....William 23:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I'm not sure about this one. Worth a look though certainly. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the spelling is better than most of Ryan's work but his other edits raise suspicions. See what the check user says, if it's not Ryan, then I'll AFD it. One way or another SAS Flight 910 is a dead duck. Very non notable....William 23:12, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I decided not to wait, and start the AFD....William 23:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

As a formal acknowledgment from one gentleman to another, I apologize for deceiving you. As I have just recently revealed, I am User: Shakinglord. I also apologize for any disruption or grief this may cause you. Good day, Bushranger. I wish you luck with your future endeavors. Robby The Penguin (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suprise, his ban has been upheld. Facepalm Facepalm That was entertaining for a few hours last night! How about a new realtiy show: WP's Next Banned User! I'd watch it, and I hate reality shows. :) - BilCat (talk) 00:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You'd think people would understand the WP:STANDARDOFFER, wouldn't you? - The Bushranger One ping only 00:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Adult people, yes; 15-year-old people - not so much! - BilCat (talk) 00:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TCM again??!!

I found Night Flight on TCM this week, on the first-time broadcast of a long-lost all-star epic. Despite heavy-hitters John and Lionel Barrymore, Helen Hayes, Clark Gable, Robert Montgomery, and Myrna Loy, Night Flight (1933) has been out of circulation for nearly 70 years. MGM withdrew it in 1942 when the company's rights to the Antoine de Saint-Exupéry (The Little Prince) story expired. It was finally shown again earlier in 2011 at the TCM Classic Film Festival in Hollywood, and now released to DVD in 2012 and television on August 10, 2012. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Most intriguing stuff! - The Bushranger One ping only 20:51, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great job of filling in details; I added a separate note to readers about the origin of Antoine de Saint Exupéry's work and his death in 1944. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

hi. where is my article that you delet ? .... i want to try to edit him again please. if you can please put this in my Sandbox - Thank you. also maybe need to change the name of this article. פארוק (talk) 17:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please page protect Rory McIlroy?

The IPS are changing the page. It's going to get worse after he wins....William 22:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch. Protected for 12 hours (which should give him time to win the tournament I suppose!). - The Bushranger One ping only 22:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL!

Your friend, Jayemd, is a crybaby! --Modern Warfare Dude (talk) 02:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]