Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 30d) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong/Archive 8. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Hi. Is there anyone here who knows about [[Talk:Bat dau tu nay|北漏洞拉]]? [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 14:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. Is there anyone here who knows about [[Talk:Bat dau tu nay|北漏洞拉]]? [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 14:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
==[[:Category:Tiangong]] and [[:Category:Shenzhou program]]== |
|||
[[:Category:Tiangong]] and [[:Category:Shenzhou program]] have been proposed to be renamed. There's also an issue on which English variant should be used. As HK has been part of China since 1997, would HK English be the preferred form of English? Would HK English use "program" or "programme" ? -- [[Special:Contributions/70.24.247.242|70.24.247.242]] ([[User talk:70.24.247.242|talk]]) 02:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:10, 13 August 2012
Hong Kong Project‑class | ||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong: Attention needed (60)
Collaboration needed Improvement needed
Cleanup needed
Image needed (348) Destub needed
Deorphan needed Page creation needed Miscellaneous tasks
|
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT
|
|||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
template:Zh-hk icon
{{Zh-hk icon}} says it classifies "simplified" characters, but the template text itself seems to be written for "traditional" characters. Which is this template supposed to tag? 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Good call, I've undone the edit. Deryck C. 20:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Bishops article name help
Hullo HK-knowing folk. I need to borrow your knowledge. I keep an eye on the articles of Anglican bishops – for Hong Kong that means the bishops of Sheng Kung Hui. Particularly, I like to make sure that articles are in the correct place (i.e. the article name is right). However, I don't really know how names work in HK. What are the parts of these names, and where should their articles be?
- Peter Kwong Kong-kit
- Paul Kwong (does he have more names? Why not?)
- Louis Tsan Sang Tsui
- Yee-po Thomas Soo
- Andrew Chan Au-Ming
Many thanks ✝DBD 16:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Usually the shorter the better, keep it simple, you may refer to WP:UCN and WP:NC-ZH. T@ναταΓ (discuss–?) 16:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Can anyone help me, please? This has been relisted twice without sufficient consensus. Someone help can determin whether the article must be either "Connie Mak" or "Kitman Mak". Thanks! George Ho (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
- I closed it despite the recent relist. The discussion is just dragging on without getting anywhere; and since the current name is valid, I decided to just leave it there. Deryck C. 11:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Perth requested-move notification
An earlier requested-move survey generated lots of controversy and an arbitration case. Therefore, this one is being posted here and in many other places, to gather a very wide range of opinions outside of the Scotland and Australia WikiProjects. |
A requested move survey was started at Talk:Perth_(disambiguation)#Requested_move, which proposes to move:
Background: There was a previous requested-move survey which ran from late May to mid June. There was a great deal of controversy surrounding the closure and subsequent events, which involved a number of reverts and re-reverts which are the subject of an ongoing arbitration case. There was a move review process, which was closed with a finding that the original requested-move closure was endorsed; however, the move review process is relatively new and untried. — P.T. Aufrette (talk) 03:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
北漏洞拉
Hi. Is there anyone here who knows about 北漏洞拉? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Category:Tiangong and Category:Shenzhou program have been proposed to be renamed. There's also an issue on which English variant should be used. As HK has been part of China since 1997, would HK English be the preferred form of English? Would HK English use "program" or "programme" ? -- 70.24.247.242 (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)