Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs)
m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 30d) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hong Kong/Archive 8.
No edit summary
Line 48: Line 48:


Hi. Is there anyone here who knows about [[Talk:Bat dau tu nay|北漏洞拉]]? [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 14:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Is there anyone here who knows about [[Talk:Bat dau tu nay|北漏洞拉]]? [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 14:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

==[[:Category:Tiangong]] and [[:Category:Shenzhou program]]==
[[:Category:Tiangong]] and [[:Category:Shenzhou program]] have been proposed to be renamed. There's also an issue on which English variant should be used. As HK has been part of China since 1997, would HK English be the preferred form of English? Would HK English use "program" or "programme" ? -- [[Special:Contributions/70.24.247.242|70.24.247.242]] ([[User talk:70.24.247.242|talk]]) 02:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:10, 13 August 2012

WikiProject iconHong Kong Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

Collaboration needed

Improvement needed

Cleanup needed

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Deorphan needed

Page creation needed

Miscellaneous tasks

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT

template:Zh-hk icon

{{Zh-hk icon}} says it classifies "simplified" characters, but the template text itself seems to be written for "traditional" characters. Which is this template supposed to tag? 70.24.251.208 (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good call, I've undone the edit. Deryck C. 20:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bishops article name help

Hullo HK-knowing folk. I need to borrow your knowledge. I keep an eye on the articles of Anglican bishops – for Hong Kong that means the bishops of Sheng Kung Hui. Particularly, I like to make sure that articles are in the correct place (i.e. the article name is right). However, I don't really know how names work in HK. What are the parts of these names, and where should their articles be?

Many thanks ✝DBD 16:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Usually the shorter the better, keep it simple, you may refer to WP:UCN and WP:NC-ZH. T@ναταΓ (discuss?) 16:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone help me, please? This has been relisted twice without sufficient consensus. Someone help can determin whether the article must be either "Connie Mak" or "Kitman Mak". Thanks! George Ho (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I closed it despite the recent relist. The discussion is just dragging on without getting anywhere; and since the current name is valid, I decided to just leave it there. Deryck C. 11:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perth requested-move notification

A requested move survey was started at Talk:Perth_(disambiguation)#Requested_move, which proposes to move:

Background: There was a previous requested-move survey which ran from late May to mid June. There was a great deal of controversy surrounding the closure and subsequent events, which involved a number of reverts and re-reverts which are the subject of an ongoing arbitration case. There was a move review process, which was closed with a finding that the original requested-move closure was endorsed; however, the move review process is relatively new and untried. — P.T. Aufrette (talk) 03:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

北漏洞拉

Hi. Is there anyone here who knows about 北漏洞拉? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tiangong and Category:Shenzhou program have been proposed to be renamed. There's also an issue on which English variant should be used. As HK has been part of China since 1997, would HK English be the preferred form of English? Would HK English use "program" or "programme" ? -- 70.24.247.242 (talk) 02:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]