Talk:Jordan Jefferson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:49, 25 August 2012

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

College football Stub‑class

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by Onthegogo (talk · contribs) on 8 February 2010.
It was contested by Thomas.macmillan (talk · contribs) on 2010-02-08

Factually correct

Nothing in my edit is incorrect.

However your revision has self produced stats like "regular season passer efficiency" that is not recognized by the NCAA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panaajack (talk • contribs) 02:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my revision. As I clearly said in both of my edit summaries, I was reverting to the NPOV version by another editor. If that version is not perfect then fix it, but don't keep reverting to your version that uses clearly WP:NPOV terms such as "He will be known as the only QB in the history of the BCS championship series to lead his team to zero points ", "Jefferson once again showed his indecisiveness in the UT game", "In a bizarre coaching decision ", ~~"In a bizarre coaching decision",~~ "LSU failed to score a single point, making them the only team in BCS championship history to rise to such a level of futility" etc.

When you are undone and asked to take it to the Talk page, making another revert seconds after making a brief comment on the Talk page (without waiting for a response) is not appropriate. If you are editing in good faith please self revert your last edit and discuss this. Right now it looks like you have made 5 reversions on this page in the last 24 hours using 2 IPs as well as your account to avoid an obvious WP:3RR violation. Meters (talk) 02:37, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The constant revisions began long ago when editors began removing factual information about the drop in team production, and creating fluff stats like "regular season efficiency", and "Top 5" in combine results, when there were only 2 participants in some events. Its beyond comical that the edits continue to revert to that POV, which is clearly biased — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panaajack (talk • contribs) 03:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have not self-reverted. Please do so. You have not made any attempt to explain why your edits should not be immediately reverted as not NPOV. You have not commented on my observation that you appear to be using 3 accounts to avoid 3RR violations. In fact looking at the edit histories, it appears that there may be additional IPs involved. Revert and discuss or let the sockpuppet investigation decide. Meters (talk) 04:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intention of reverting. Allow me the time to source all my "comments", and you will see they are widely held opinions.

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 The constant revisions began long ago when editors began removing factual information about the drop in team production, and creating fluff stats like "regular season efficiency", and "Top 5" in combine results, when there were only 2 participants in some events. Its beyond comical that the edits continue to revert to that POV, which is clearly biased  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Panaajack|Panaajack]] ([[User talk:Panaajack|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Panaajack|contribs]]) 03:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :You have not self-reverted. Please do so. You have not made any attempt to explain why your edits should  not be immediately reverted as not NPOV. You have not commented on my observation that you appear to be using 3 accounts to avoid 3RR violations. In fact looking at the edit histories, it appears that there may be additional IPs involved. Revert and discuss or let the sockpuppet investigation decide. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 04:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
+I have no intention of reverting. Allow me the time to source all my "comments", and you will see they are widely held opinions.