Jump to content

Talk:Jordan Jefferson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Factually correct

[edit]

Nothing in my edit is incorrect.

However your revision has self produced stats like "regular season passer efficiency" that is not recognized by the NCAA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panaajack (talkcontribs) 02:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my revision. As I clearly said in both of my edit summaries, I was reverting to the NPOV version by another editor. If that version is not perfect then fix it, but don't keep reverting to your version that uses clearly WP:NPOV terms such as "He will be known as the only QB in the history of the BCS championship series to lead his team to zero points ", "Jefferson once again showed his indecisiveness in the UT game", "In a bizarre coaching decision ", "In a bizarre coaching decision", "LSU failed to score a single point, making them the only team in BCS championship history to rise to such a level of futility" etc.
When you are undone and asked to take it to the Talk page, making another revert seconds after making a brief comment on the Talk page (without waiting for a response) is not appropriate. If you are editing in good faith please self revert your last edit and discuss this. Right now it looks like you have made 5 reversions on this page in the last 24 hours using 2 IPs as well as your account to avoid an obvious WP:3RR violation. Meters (talk) 02:37, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The constant revisions began long ago when editors began removing factual information about the drop in team production, and creating fluff stats like "regular season efficiency", and "Top 5" in combine results, when there were only 2 participants in some events. Its beyond comical that the edits continue to revert to that POV, which is clearly biased — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panaajack (talkcontribs) 03:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have not self-reverted. Please do so. You have not made any attempt to explain why your edits should not be immediately reverted as not NPOV. You have not commented on my observation that you appear to be using 3 accounts to avoid 3RR violations. In fact looking at the edit histories, it appears that there may be additional IPs involved. Revert and discuss or let the sockpuppet investigation decide. Meters (talk) 04:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intention of reverting. Allow me the time to source all my "comments", and you will see they are widely held opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.206.214 (talk) 05:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jordan Jefferson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]