User talk:Deepfriedokra/20120823-20130831

Muthoot Pappachan Group

Err, thanks, I guess. I'm not usually one for that sort of thing, but A7s that rely on lazy racism tend to get my goat. WilyD 08:21, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

nevertheless. U dun good :) Dlohcierekim 17:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Deepfriedokra. You have new messages at Jsharpminor's talk page.
Message added 20:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jsharpminor (talk) 20:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello - I'm Baffled!

I rarely edit Wikipedia. When I do, it's usually to straighten out a sentence to make it more coherent. Today, I logged in and read that I had a new message - from April of 2010. What the? It's now August of 2012. The message: "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dlohcierekim 02:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)"

I've no idea what this refers to, if this is glitch, the result of a shared IP address or a mis-identification of an edit. As I say, I only edit for clarity, never to gut and article, insert idiotic opinions, and I don't consider myself a vandal. If the message I received is ancient history that isn't worth looking into, that's fine by me. I'm not bothered because I'm pretty sure this is an inexplicable Wikipedia hiccup. Otherwise, keep on editing and keep Wikipedia sailing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheStockwell (talk • contribs) 05:06, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

also spracht dlohcierekim Dlohcierekim 02:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Deepfriedokra. You have new messages at Theopolisme's talk page.
Message added 03:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

? Theopolisme _{:) 03:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)}

Thus spake I] Dlohcierekim 03:33, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi Dlohcierekim,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ochuko Tonukari (2nd nomination) was an attempt (successful? unsuccessful?) on my part to reduce the amount of on-wiki teh dramahz. Thank you for closing it, and my apologies if it caused you any grief whatsoever. Tho I do edit contentious articles and those with contentious content, I am on personal and perpetual Dramaout.
Thanks again! --Shirt58 (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

No prob. Dlohcierekim 13:16, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome home ...

good to see that sig. around again. — Ched :  ?  12:18, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Good to be seen and good to see so many blue and white sigs. :) Dlohcierekim 20:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your support at my RfA and the well wishes. Don't be surprised if I take you up on your offer for help :-) —Bagumba (talk) 01:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

certainly Dlohcierekim 01:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Purple meteorite

is a brand name for a watch, and the age given in the article of 14 billion years is the age of the universe - the oldest thing found in the solar system is about 4.5 billion. Peridon (talk) 17:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

LOL. I new that date looked familiar. Thanks. Purple rain sounds like a good name, right? Dlohcierekim 17:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

It was an age of purple dinosaurs; be among the first to own a memento of a time 14 xillion years ago! Acroterion (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Barney!!! I want one! Dlohcierekim 17:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Jim Bonacci

Could I set this page up to be a redirect to Happy Wheels again, or would you not recommend that given that the page has been deleted a number of times now? I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 21:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

This was deleted 3 times so it is amenable to WP:SALT. Maybe I can restore the redirect and then protect it. Dlohcierekim 21:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Nope. Result was just plain delete. Will need WP:DRV . Dlohcierekim 21:56, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 August 27

For List of unreleased Lana Del Rey songs, can you please give me your opinion? Am I delusional or what? Because this article was deleted per WP:LISTN, but it follows WP:LISTN? So I'm 100000% confused why everyone's nominating and saying it doesn't follow policy. I honestly have absolutely no idea. You can see my comment at the bottom of the review. The reliable sources are very reliable so... I don't get it. --MrIndustry (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

It seems to be the issues are notability and sourcing. The consensus is that as a group, the items on the list are not notable. As they have not been released, they have not attained notability. No argument was successfully made that they were. Behind that is the sourcing problem. The consensus was that there is an insurmountable lack of WP:RS for the contents. The arguments for deletion were thorough and well supported. Arguments such as "valuable information" and "frequently updated" are never compelling, especially when sourcing is in doubt. The closing admin did appear to leave open the possibility of adding any items that have WP:RS to another page, though it might be best to obtain consensus on that pages talk first. Sorry I could not be more helpful. Dlohcierekim 13:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

But that's what I don't get, because the sources are reliable. They're MTV, ASCAP, HFA, BMI, Entertainment Weekly, Ryan Seacrest, Glamour Magazine, Huffington Post, etc. I don't get how List of unreleased Britney Spears songs and List of unreleased Michael Jackson material can be featured lists with so unreliable sources?? My whole thing was Lana still performs these songs and Britney never will/never did.--MrIndustry (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Apparently the other participants did not agree w/ your assessment of the sources. Dlohcierekim 16:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't mean to sound rude/condescending to them, but would they like it written in the constitution? Because Hollywood Reporter, MTV, and Huffington Post are some of the top news sites in the world. If they're not reliable then I don't know what sources are. --MrIndustry (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Deepfriedokra. You have new messages at DoriSmith's talk page.
Message added 00:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of artmatch4U in Wikipedia

An associate of mine was kind enough to spend three hours this morning putting together a Wikipedia page for artmatch4U.com, and you quickly deleted this legitimate website, obviously without verifying the content of it. I would like to know why. Is it because my office computer and user name was used to create the article? Was a different Wikipedia user name needed? Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CLS2012 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)