Talk:FTL: Faster Than Light: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:47, 21 September 2012

Video games Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

WIP

I will add info from time to time, however in the meantime feel free to contribute anything you have. Zackuber (talk) 12:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

Is there something else called FTL: Faster Than Light? If not, then please removed the parenthesis. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 09:32, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a Roguelike

The page currently describes this game as a roguelike, but at best it can be considered a roguelike-like, in that it contains some elements of a roguelike, but not enough to be considered one. It is even described this way on the developer's own webpage. Gilgatex (talk) 20:54, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took the liberty of describing it closer to how the developer clarifies their usage of the term (that they 'use this term loosely'). We don't need another subgenre of what is already a subgenre. Roguelikelike sounds silly anyway, not something one expects to see in an encyclopaedia. --86.5.226.63 (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==Not a Roguelike==
 The page currently describes this game as a roguelike, but at best it can be considered a roguelike-like, in that it contains some elements of a roguelike, but not enough to be considered one.  It is even described this way on the developer's own webpage. [[User:Gilgatex|Gilgatex]] ([[User talk:Gilgatex|talk]]) 20:54, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
-:I took the liberty of describing it closer to how the developer describes it (that they 'use this term loosely'). We don't need another subgenre of what is already a subgenre. Roguelikelike sounds silly anyway. --[[Special:Contributions/86.5.226.63|86.5.226.63]] ([[User talk:86.5.226.63|talk]]) 23:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
+:I took the liberty of describing it closer to how the developer clarifies their usage of the term (that they 'use this term loosely'). We don't need another subgenre of what is already a subgenre. Roguelikelike sounds silly anyway, not something one expects to see in an encyclopaedia. --[[Special:Contributions/86.5.226.63|86.5.226.63]] ([[User talk:86.5.226.63|talk]]) 23:40, 21 September 2012 (UTC)