Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 30d) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation/Archive 2. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
This has been covered elsewhere, but do we really need a separate importance class of "No" just for redirects and disambiguation pages? Most other projects do not use this extra criteria for non-article pages, and the few projects that do have it as an option, do not use it consistently in favor of "NA". Both of these importance criteria apply to non-article pages such as redirects, and if "importance=no" is left off, the importance defaults to "NA" anyway. I think that a lot of time and extra sorting could be eliminated, if we did away with "No-importance", and let '''all''' non-article pages fall under "NA-importance". [[User:Fortdj33|Fortdj33]] ([[User talk:Fortdj33|talk]]) 18:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
This has been covered elsewhere, but do we really need a separate importance class of "No" just for redirects and disambiguation pages? Most other projects do not use this extra criteria for non-article pages, and the few projects that do have it as an option, do not use it consistently in favor of "NA". Both of these importance criteria apply to non-article pages such as redirects, and if "importance=no" is left off, the importance defaults to "NA" anyway. I think that a lot of time and extra sorting could be eliminated, if we did away with "No-importance", and let '''all''' non-article pages fall under "NA-importance". [[User:Fortdj33|Fortdj33]] ([[User talk:Fortdj33|talk]]) 18:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Posted and replied at [[Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment]]. '''[[User:Jj98|JJ98]] <small>([[User talk:Jj98|Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Jj98|Contribs]])</small>''' 08:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC) |
:Posted and replied at [[Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment]]. '''[[User:Jj98|JJ98]] <small>([[User talk:Jj98|Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Jj98|Contribs]])</small>''' 08:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Category:Computer-animated short films == |
|||
I think the category "Category:Computer-animated short films" should be created. Now if you want to remark that a film is a short film made with computer animation you have to categorize it with "Category:Computer-animated films" and "Category:Animated short films", so I think it is better to create this new category.--[[User:Aliuken|Aliuken]] ([[User talk:Aliuken|talk]]) 13:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:34, 1 October 2012
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Animation and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | Points of interest related to Animation on Wikipedia: History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
 | Animation Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Animation and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used
| WikiProject Animation |
|---|
|
| Information |
| Animation Portal • Changes |
No-importance?
This has been covered elsewhere, but do we really need a separate importance class of "No" just for redirects and disambiguation pages? Most other projects do not use this extra criteria for non-article pages, and the few projects that do have it as an option, do not use it consistently in favor of "NA". Both of these importance criteria apply to non-article pages such as redirects, and if "importance=no" is left off, the importance defaults to "NA" anyway. I think that a lot of time and extra sorting could be eliminated, if we did away with "No-importance", and let all non-article pages fall under "NA-importance". Fortdj33 (talk) 18:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Posted and replied at Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment. JJ98 (Talk / Contribs) 08:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Category:Computer-animated short films
I think the category "Category:Computer-animated short films" should be created. Now if you want to remark that a film is a short film made with computer animation you have to categorize it with "Category:Computer-animated films" and "Category:Animated short films", so I think it is better to create this new category.--Aliuken (talk) 13:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)