User talk:Cdwn: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:02, 2 November 2012

Cdwn, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Cdwn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:14, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Cdwn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Mojang. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Thank you kindly for the welcome. — cdwn 18:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nice job with the logo! I had uploaded File:Mojang logo.png because I couldn't access the SVG version at the time. Keep up the good work! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 18:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I noticed you had uploaded it and listed an SVG as a source, so I was curious about the PNG until I also received the 404 mentioned. Thankfully I found it mirrored elsewhere under the same name. — cdwn 18:26, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Apple Inc. logo.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Apple Inc. logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied over there. — cdwn 14:33, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Barbican Centre logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Barbican Centre logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a bot bug, the image has never been orphaned. I reported the bug on the maintainer's talk page. — cdwn 12:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI...

So you know, in closing the discussion at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 16#Photographs by Nikola Gruev, I used rollback to remove all of the file tags that you placed in the process of doing that nomination. I did this because it was the most expedient tool for the job in removing these tags after I closed the discussion (a simple close without prejudice pending completion of a process on Commons), and I don't want you to think that my massive use of rollback is any reflection on you or your judgment in making the nomination. Just speed. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, thanks for letting me know! — cdwn 21:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 So you know, in closing the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 October 16#Photographs by Nikola Gruev]], I used rollback to remove all of the file tags that you placed in the process of doing that nomination.  I did this because it was the most expedient tool for the job in removing these tags after I closed the discussion (a simple close without prejudice pending completion of a process on Commons), and I don't want you to think that my massive use of rollback is any reflection on you or your judgment in making the nomination.  Just speed.  [[User:SchuminWeb|SchuminWeb]] ([[User talk:SchuminWeb|Talk]]) 19:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 :That's fine, thanks for letting me know! —&nbsp;[[User talk:cdwn|cdwn]] 21:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
-==Talkback - gwickwire==
-{{talkback|Gwickwire|ts=22:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)}}
-I replied on my talk page and on the fork bomb talk page. I think you'd be in the right to remove the information now. Please beware of [[WP:3RR|the 3 revert rule]] however :) Happy Editing!  [[User:gwickwire|gwickwire]] &#124; [[User_talk:gwickwire|Leave a message]] 22:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)