User talk:Fang Aili/Archive4

Fang Aili's talk page

Start a new talk topic. Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Thank you- Many thanks for fixing my user page. I hope you are doing well. Again, my thanks-RFD 17:02, 29 April 2006 (UTC) SOS for Sam Spade Hey, I found your comment on my friend Merecat's page. I'm with you. There's an rfc on Sam Spade. They are sitting around and eating cookies while they hurl insults and make dumb yuccy social worker type comments about him. I actually feel like throwing up. Can you help him? Thanks, Maggiethewolfstar 18:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Belated Easter Bunny I was just cleaning up memory in my mobile and found this SMS from a friend. Since you like cute things anyway, maybe it's not too late. :) Misza13 T C 20:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC) /)/) =(';')= ...(")___(")... Hmmm... Strange effect, BTW. I have forced the table to style="background:none;" and it "burned" through your "stationery". Sorry! ;-p Misza13 T C 20:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Thanks What a beautifully programmed talk page. Thanks for the revert at Craw; I responded to this person at the talk page of that article but they don't appear to have read it. I wrote most of the article text and am not a member of the band, though I've seen them perform a few times and have some of their CDs. BTW we just had a speaker at my university from the university in Milwaukee; she presented a film in progress about links between the blues and West African music. It was interesting! Badagnani 02:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC) This is Moe Hello Fang Aili, just thought I would let you know that I was leaving Wikipedia, but before I left, I finally got a picture of thyself onto Wikipedia. (I know great timing for me to post a picture of myself, right?) This is my final gift to my friends. Later! PS. Try not to laugh to hard at my ugly mug ok? Moe ε 15:29, 30 April 2006 (UTC) RE: Wikipedia soft on vandalism Thanks alot for your words of encouragement and your comments of support on the Wikipedia too soft on vandals discussion. I knew by posting on that page I was "in a den of lions", but I needed to do it. I spent a lot of time here on WP, but almost all of my time now is spend just reverting vandalism to pages on my watch list. It just bothers me, ya know? I only wish there were better counter-vandalism measures in place. Anyway, thanks again --AbsolutDan (talk) 23:05, 2 May 2006 (UTC) your recent RfA I don't know if I ever congratulated you on your successful RfA. Anyway, it was a pleasure voting for you, as I'm sure you're going to make a great admin. Best of luck, --Deville (Talk) 00:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC) Also, no problem on the revert! Actually, it was kind of weird, I couldn't figure out what the vandal was going on about. I even looked through his recent edits to try and get a clue but I couldn't figure it out. Very strange. --Deville (Talk) 01:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Speedy keep of Rationales provided by advocates of the Impeachment of George W. Bush Why did you speedy keep this? It does not meet any of the criteria outlined in Wikipedia:Speedy keep which are: An article can be speedily kept ONLY if one of the following holds: the nominator withdraws the AFD and there have been no votes to delete so far. the nominator clearly states that s/he actually wants the article renamed, merged, moved or redirected, rather than deleted, and the AFD has not yet received any valid delete votes. The page does not qualify for AFD as it is not an article, and it belongs on a deletion page for redirects, images, stubs, categories, templates, or miscellaneous pages (userpages and wikipedia namespace). The discussion should be closed in AFD and re-opened on the correct place for deletion discussion. Note that this is a speedy close, so it still may be deleted in the end. the nomination was clear-cut vandalism or WP:POINT and nobody disputes this or votes to delete it anyway (since calling a nomination vandalistic does not make it so and actual POINT-making AFD nominations appear far less frequently than accusations thereof). the nominator is banned, so they are not supposed to edit. In that case, the article is speedily kept while the nomination can be tagged with (db-ban) and speedily deleted as a banned contribution. You might claim that you can Ignore All Rules as I did when I speedy kept the Armenian Genocide article which is clearly notable and verifiable. Many people including myself are of the view that the rationale is a clear breach of WP:NOT. It would have been better in my judgement if you had let the debate run its course. Capitalistroadster 02:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Speedy Keep You just did a speedy keep on Bush saying that the last AfD was just closed. It was closed improperly. I took it to Deletion Review. The AfD was re-opened. Then it was closed again by a second admin who says the result at WP:ANI is to relist. It is somewhat confusing, but one of the two listings needs to proceed. Johntex\talk 05:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC) Never mind, we have another AfD going now: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination). Johntex\talk 05:48, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 68.81.182.9 Incident Hi Fang Aili, This might seem like a random request, but did anything become of the User_talk:68.81.182.9 incident? 1 2 I am a student from Penn State, and found the comments a bit troubling. If this sort of thing happens again, please drop me a line--I am willing to meet with our network security expert. Thanks GChriss 01:42, 5 May 2006 (UTC) WEKhilpurnil request Hey Fang, You just recently edited a page called WEKhilpurnil and I was wondering how would I go about making it a seperate page. I do have some information on it and I do have the plant so I can probably get a photo on there as well. Any suggestions? --— Preceding unsigned comment added by Icshadowiclight (talk • contribs) Paypal link Could you please comment on the apropriateness of this [1]. Xtra 05:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC) User:Pnatt I think Pnatt's talk page is going to need protecting. He's just removing everyone else's comments and repeatedly asking to be unblocked. Cheers. --Evan C (Talk) 09:53, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Albert Fish Thanks for catching the Albert Fish edit. I have noticed that large articles are causing problems with my Firefox browser (it blanks them out). I will try to pay attention to this in the future. Thanks again. --YUL89YYZ 20:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC) Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #3 Administrator Coaching The Administrator Coaching program is a program aimed at preparing Wikipedians for Adminship or helping them understand the intricacies of Wikipedia better. Recently, changes have been made to the requirements of coachees. Please review them before requesting this service. This would be something like the Welcoming Committee, but for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. Some might like suggestions about how to learn vandal patrol, or mentoring on taking an article to featured status, or guidance with a proposal they plan to make at the Village Pump, for example. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins. Stressbusters The Stressbusters are a subset of Esperanza aiming to investigate the causes of stress. New eyes on the situation are always welcome! Note from the editor As always, MiszaBot handled this delivery. Thank you! Also, congratulations go to Pschemp, Titoxd and Freakofnurture for being elected in the last elections! An Esperanzial May to all of the readership! The last AC meeting (full log) Posting logs of the Esperanza IRC channel are explicitly banned anywhere. Violation of this rule results in deletion and a ban from the channel. A disclaimer is going to be added to the Esperanza main page. We are humans and, as such, are imperfect. Various revisions have been made to the Code of Conduct. Please see them, as the proposal is ready to be ratified by the community and enacted. All members will members to have to re-confirm their membership after accepting the Code of Conduct. Referendums are to be held on whether terms of AC members should be lengthened and whether we should abolish votes full stop. Admin Coaching reform is agreed upon. Signed... Celestianpower, JoanneB, Titoxd, Pschemp and Freakofnurture 20:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC) Please check if the characters are correct Did I write it correctly?--The ikiroid (talk)(Help Me Improve) 21:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC) Xplayer You're removed the speedy deletion tag from Xplayer because "remove speedy, not w/in last 48 hrs". Why did you mean with "w/in last 48 hrs". Please clarify this edit summary. TPA5 16:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC) from thewolfstar I left a comment on this page but got no response for it. I saw a thank you that you left Merecat on his page from a while ago. Merecat needs your help now. Please consider giving him a helping hand now. Thanks, Maggiethewolfstar 16:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC) IRC and such So I see :P. No problem. This is difficult, isn't it? --Celestianpower háblame 18:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Stress relief? How can it not be there - it has over 100K residents... --Celestianpower háblame 19:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC) Why did u Why did you have to delete the Evgenij Popov Post??? Do you understand the word fun. Btw this guy is going to be real famous in the near future so its ^good to start a post on him now.