Talk:LGM-25C Titan II: Difference between revisions
one lump or wo |
|||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
The [[LR-87]] used in the first stage is a single engine with two nozzles. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 18:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC) |
The [[LR-87]] used in the first stage is a single engine with two nozzles. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 18:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
:That is not correct, the LR-87-5 was a single chamber engine, which was fitted as a pair on the Titan II first stage. That is in contrast to the LR-87-3 of the Titan I, which was a two chamber engine with shared turbo-pump comparable to the modern [[RD-180]].[[User:Geomartin|Geomartin]] ([[User talk:Geomartin|talk]]) 11:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:01, 25 November 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGM-25C Titan II article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Deployment Numbers
The deployment numbers cannot be correct. There were 54 silos at the 3 operational bases plus three training complexes with one missile each at Vandenberg temporarly on alert, so the maximum number of deployed missiles is 57 at any given time.Geomartin (talk) 08:45, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Gov't Report
The text on the www.fas.org about the Titan II missile is not copyrighted material. It comes from page 233 of the U.S. Government report:
"To Defend and Deter: Legacy of the United States Cold War Missile Program" - 1996
by John C. Lonnquest and David F. Winkler USACERL Special Report 97/01 A study sponsored by the Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program Cold War Project 607 pages - illustrated
70.95-mb PDF format
The report is available at this URL.
http://www.cevp.com/docs/COLDWAR/1996-11-01952.pdf
Compare the Titan II section starting on page 233.
- The text on this current Titan II page comes from the US Air Force Titan II Fact Sheet at this URL:
- The link displayed is no longer validDwarner30uk (talk) 17:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Rusty 03:16, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Titan II range
Titan II, as deployed, had a range of 5,500 nautical miles, not 9,000 miles. At one time the thought to deploy the Titan I Mark IV RV and warhead generated one flight that failed at staging and this is likely the source of the 9,000 mile range. The deployed Titan II had the W-53 and Mark VI RV, as correctly stated in the article.
Sources:
<"WS 107C, Titan II Weapon System Final Report, January 1965," held at the History Office, Peterson AFB, Colorado Springs,classified SECRET. The information cited is not classified.>/ <"Detailed Design Specifications for Model SM-68B Missile, Including Addendum for XSM-68B," held at History Office, Peterson AFB, unclassified.> 206.128.65.121 (talk) 02:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
No mention of fatal accident in Searcy Arkansas silo
| Source--Senor Freebie (talk) 11:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Feel free to do so. Ckruschke (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Ckruschke
One lump or two
The LR-87 used in the first stage is a single engine with two nozzles. Andrewa (talk) 18:19, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
- That is not correct, the LR-87-5 was a single chamber engine, which was fitted as a pair on the Titan II first stage. That is in contrast to the LR-87-3 of the Titan I, which was a two chamber engine with shared turbo-pump comparable to the modern RD-180.Geomartin (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Unassessed Rocketry articles
- Unknown-importance Rocketry articles
- WikiProject Rocketry articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- B-Class spaceflight articles
- Mid-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles