Talk:Narconon: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 30d) to Talk:Narconon/Archive 1. |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
::I'm watching it like a hawk. :) --[[User:Mknjbhvgcf|Mknjbhvgcf]] ([[User talk:Mknjbhvgcf|talk]]) 13:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC) |
::I'm watching it like a hawk. :) --[[User:Mknjbhvgcf|Mknjbhvgcf]] ([[User talk:Mknjbhvgcf|talk]]) 13:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
== NPOV? == |
|||
The intro to the article alone is all but neutral. This article needs a major overhaul. Suggestions how to go about it? [[User:Fairyday|Fairyday]] ([[User talk:Fairyday|talk]]) 05:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:20, 7 January 2013
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Narconon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Why I've removed the Quackery banner
I think I made the wrong choice in adding it in the first place.
Hadn't realised that it was not widely used in other wikipedia articles about quack medicine, or that it was so contentious.
Further discussion can be found over at Wikipedia_talk:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Pseudoscience_.27warning.27_headers where I'm seeing some pretty cogent arguments against its use.
So, reverted my own edit and removed it. It wouldn't be fair to 'single out' Narconon from other types of quack medicine.
Chalk it up to newbieness.
--Mknjbhvgcf (talk) 18:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- According to the pseudoscience warning header discussion, the warning is to be stated in the lede, not in a disclaimer. I suppose it just means the lede needs to be watched closely for dilutions. Thimbleweed (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm watching it like a hawk. :) --Mknjbhvgcf (talk) 13:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
NPOV?
The intro to the article alone is all but neutral. This article needs a major overhaul. Suggestions how to go about it? Fairyday (talk) 05:20, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Scientology articles
- Top-importance Scientology articles
- WikiProject Scientology articles
- B-Class California articles
- Unknown-importance California articles
- B-Class Los Angeles articles
- Unknown-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- B-Class Alternative medicine articles
- B-Class Alternative Views articles
- Low-importance Alternative Views articles
- WikiProject Alternative Views articles
- Unassessed Skepticism articles
- Unknown-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles