Fat cat: Difference between revisions
←Replaced content with ' {{DEFAULTSORT:Fat Cat (Term)}} Category:Slang Category:Political terminology' |
ClueBot NG (talk | contribs) m Reverting possible vandalism by 205.122.9.47 to version by The Illusive Man. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1449130) (Bot) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:The Subsidised Mineowner.jpg|thumb|Caricature of a fat cat]] |
|||
'''Fat cat''' is a [[political]] term originally describing a rich political [[Donation|donor]], also called an '''angel''' or '''big money man'''.<ref name="Of Fat Cats">{{cite news | url = http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,877421,00.html | title = Of Fat Cats and Other Angels | date = November 29, 1971 | work = [[Time (magazine)|Time]] | accessdate = 2008-03-31 }}</ref> |
|||
The ''[[New York Times]]'' has described fat cats as symbols of "a deeply corrupt campaign finance system riddled with loopholes", with Americans seeing them as recipients of the "perks of power", but able to "buy access, influence policy and even veto appointments."<ref name="Berke">{{cite news | url = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B02E3DF103FF934A25751C0A9649C8B63 | title = Money Talks; Don't Discount the Fat Cats | author = Richard L. Berke | date = February 17, 2002 | publisher = [[The New York Times]] | accessdate = 2008-03-31 }}</ref> |
|||
It is also commonly used to describe a [[Wealth|rich]], [[greed]]y person who, due to ownership of large amounts of [[capital (economics)|capital]], is able to "live easy" off the work of others.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://economist.com/business/displayStory.cfm?story_id=2119378 | work=The Economist | title=Fat cats feeding | date=2003-10-09}}</ref> |
|||
==History== |
|||
The word was first used in the 1920s in the [[United States]] to describe rich political [[Donation|donor]]s.<ref>''Fat Cat'', in Ayto, John (2006). ''Movers and Shakers: A Chronology of Words that Shaped Our Age'', [[Oxford University Press]]</ref><ref>[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fat+cat Merriam Webster Online], ''fat cat''</ref> |
|||
The term's coinage for political purposes has been attributed to [[Frank Kent]], a writer for the ''[[Baltimore Sun]]''<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED268584 |
|||
|title=Scratching the First Teflon Presidency: Frank Kent vs. Franklin Roosevelt |
|||
|publisher=[[United States Department of Education]] |
|||
|accessdate=2008-04-06}}</ref> whose essay "Fat Cats and Free Rides" appeared in the ''[[American Mercury]]'', a magazine of commentary run by [[H. L. Mencken]].<ref name="Sloan">{{cite book |
|||
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=CysLGUDseQAC |
|||
|title=Sloan Rules: Alfred P. Sloan and the Triumph of General Motors |
|||
|author=[[David G. Farber]] |
|||
|year=2002 |
|||
|publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]] |
|||
|isbn=0-226-23804-0}}</ref> Kent wrote: |
|||
{{cquote|A Fat Cat is a man of large means and no political experience who having reached middle age, and success in business, and finding no further thrill ... of satisfaction in the mere piling up of more millions, develops a yearning for some sort of public honor and is willing to pay for it. The machine has what it seeks, public honor, and he has the money the machine needs.<ref name="Sloan"/>}} |
|||
The 1960 campaign for the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] nomination to the presidency was marked by competition between fellow [[United States Senate|Senators]] [[Hubert Humphrey]] and [[John F. Kennedy]]. Their first meeting was in the Wisconsin primary, where Kennedy's well-organized and well-funded campaign defeated Humphrey's energetic but poorly-funded effort. Humphrey objected to the media, "The Kennedy forces are waging a psychological blitz that I cannot match. I'm not the candidate of the fat cats....".<ref>{{cite news |
|||
|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,826112,00.html |
|||
|title=Plenty of Jack |
|||
|date=March 28, 1960 |
|||
|publisher=[[TIME]] |
|||
|accessdate=2008-04-06}}</ref> |
|||
A 1972 book by [[sociologist]] [[G. William Domhoff]], titled ''Fat Cats and Democrats'', contrasted the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party's]] perceived [[populism]] with its funding structure. In Domhoff's view, "Short of a nationwide system of public financing for candidates ... it seems likely that wealthy fat cats will find one way or another to finance the candidates of their choice."<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/change/science_egalitarians.html |
|||
|title=Third Parties Don't Work: Why and How Egalitarians Should Transform the Democratic Party |
|||
|author=[[G. William Domhoff]] |
|||
|date=March 2005 |
|||
|accessdate=2008-04-05}}</ref> |
|||
The [[campaign finance reform]]s following the [[Watergate scandal]] greatly reduced the amount of money that individuals could contribute to a political campaign.<ref>{{cite book | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=e_HhCKcXx8UC | title = Mobilizing Resentment: Conservative Resurgence from the John Birch Society to the Promise Keepers | author = Jean Hardisty | others = Wilma P. Mankiller | year = 1999 | publisher = [[Beacon Press]] | isbn = 0-8070-4317-6 }}</ref> In the words of [[Ben J. Wattenberg]], "The fat cats were driven from the temple...."<ref>{{cite book | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=9jho2dEhwh0C | title = The Good News is the Bad News is Wrong | author = [[Ben J. Wattenberg]] | year = 1984 | publisher = [[Simon & Schuster]] | isbn = 0-671-60641-7 }}</ref> |
|||
During a 1997 $1,000-per-plate dinner at the [[Hilton Washington]] for the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]], which the ''New York Times'' dubbed "a lucrative display of the resilience of big-money campaign fund-raising", street protesters calling for further reform dressed in "fat cat" costumes and chanted "Hey, hey, ho, ho! Corporate fat cats like Tim Gerlach have to go!"<ref>{{cite news |
|||
|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C06E0DF1638F937A25756C0A961958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all |
|||
|title=A Dining-for-Dollars Gala Fattens the G.O.P.'s Coffers |
|||
|author=Francis X. Clines |
|||
|date=May 14, 1997 |
|||
|publisher=[[The New York Times]] |
|||
|accessdate=2008-04-06}}</ref> In the [[Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008|2008 Democratic race]], a group of wealthy backers of Sen. [[Hillary Clinton]] wrote to [[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives|Speaker of the House]] [[Nancy Pelosi]], warning her they might withdraw financial support for the [[Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee]] if Pelosi did not change her position on whether the party's [[superdelegate]]s "should support the party's pledged delegate leader".<ref name="Sinderbrand">{{cite news |
|||
|url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/27/obama.moveon/ |
|||
|title=MoveOn takes on Clinton's moneyed supporters |
|||
|author=Rebecca Sinderbrand |
|||
|date=March 27, 2008 |
|||
|publisher=[[CNN]].com |
|||
|accessdate=2008-04-06}}</ref> According to the [[Center for Responsive Politics]], the signers included donors such as [[Haim Saban]] and [[Robert L. Johnson]], and had given the party nearly $24 million since 2000.<ref>{{cite web |
|||
|url=http://www.capitaleye.org/inside.asp?ID=341 |
|||
|title=Democratic Donors Send $24 Million Letter to Pelosi |
|||
|author=Lindsay Renick Mayer |
|||
|date=March 27, 2008 |
|||
|work=Public Eye |
|||
|publisher=[[Center for Responsive Politics]] |
|||
|accessdate=2008-04-06}}</ref> In response, the [[grassroots]] liberal [[political action committee]] [[MoveOn]] called the move "the worst kind of insider politics -- billionaires bullying our elected leaders into ignoring the will of the voters," but reassured members that "when we all pool our resources, together we're stronger than the fat cats."<ref name="Sinderbrand"/> |
|||
==Use in culture and imagery== |
|||
The word has since acquired a meaning of a rich, powerful person of possibly 'undeserved' wealth. It is now commonly used in [[editorial cartoon]]s.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/cartoons/2002/07/23/bell2307.jpg | location=London | work=The Guardian}}</ref><ref>http://www.news-press.com/multimedia/galleries/dougstatetoons/images/019MacGregor%20723%20%20Fat%20Cats.jpg</ref><ref>http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/df200304/df20030404.jpg</ref> |
|||
In the British printed media, a fat cat is usually depicted as a cat-faced, clad in a [[Pin stripes|pin striped suit]] corpulent middle-aged man holding or smoking a thick [[cigar]] representing a venal banker or a high earner executive or "[[captain of industry]]". |
|||
==See also== |
|||
*[[Oligarchy]] |
|||
*[[Meritocracy]] |
|||
==References== |
|||
{{reflist}} |
|||
==External links== |
|||
{{wiktionary|fat cat}} |
|||
* [http://www.paulbaker-caricaturist.com/admin/pics/p_zoom_Fat%20Cat.jpg A Cigar smoking "Fat Cat"] |
|||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Fat Cat (Term)}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Fat Cat (Term)}} |
||
Revision as of 19:30, 16 January 2013
Fat cat is a political term originally describing a rich political donor, also called an angel or big money man.[1]
The New York Times has described fat cats as symbols of "a deeply corrupt campaign finance system riddled with loopholes", with Americans seeing them as recipients of the "perks of power", but able to "buy access, influence policy and even veto appointments."[2]
It is also commonly used to describe a rich, greedy person who, due to ownership of large amounts of capital, is able to "live easy" off the work of others.[3]
History
The word was first used in the 1920s in the United States to describe rich political donors.[4][5]
The term's coinage for political purposes has been attributed to Frank Kent, a writer for the Baltimore Sun[6] whose essay "Fat Cats and Free Rides" appeared in the American Mercury, a magazine of commentary run by H. L. Mencken.[7] Kent wrote:
A Fat Cat is a man of large means and no political experience who having reached middle age, and success in business, and finding no further thrill ... of satisfaction in the mere piling up of more millions, develops a yearning for some sort of public honor and is willing to pay for it. The machine has what it seeks, public honor, and he has the money the machine needs.[7]
The 1960 campaign for the Democratic nomination to the presidency was marked by competition between fellow Senators Hubert Humphrey and John F. Kennedy. Their first meeting was in the Wisconsin primary, where Kennedy's well-organized and well-funded campaign defeated Humphrey's energetic but poorly-funded effort. Humphrey objected to the media, "The Kennedy forces are waging a psychological blitz that I cannot match. I'm not the candidate of the fat cats....".[8]
A 1972 book by sociologist G. William Domhoff, titled Fat Cats and Democrats, contrasted the Democratic Party's perceived populism with its funding structure. In Domhoff's view, "Short of a nationwide system of public financing for candidates ... it seems likely that wealthy fat cats will find one way or another to finance the candidates of their choice."[9]
The campaign finance reforms following the Watergate scandal greatly reduced the amount of money that individuals could contribute to a political campaign.[10] In the words of Ben J. Wattenberg, "The fat cats were driven from the temple...."[11]
During a 1997 $1,000-per-plate dinner at the Hilton Washington for the Republican Party, which the New York Times dubbed "a lucrative display of the resilience of big-money campaign fund-raising", street protesters calling for further reform dressed in "fat cat" costumes and chanted "Hey, hey, ho, ho! Corporate fat cats like Tim Gerlach have to go!"[12] In the 2008 Democratic race, a group of wealthy backers of Sen. Hillary Clinton wrote to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, warning her they might withdraw financial support for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee if Pelosi did not change her position on whether the party's superdelegates "should support the party's pledged delegate leader".[13] According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the signers included donors such as Haim Saban and Robert L. Johnson, and had given the party nearly $24 million since 2000.[14] In response, the grassroots liberal political action committee MoveOn called the move "the worst kind of insider politics -- billionaires bullying our elected leaders into ignoring the will of the voters," but reassured members that "when we all pool our resources, together we're stronger than the fat cats."[13]
Use in culture and imagery
The word has since acquired a meaning of a rich, powerful person of possibly 'undeserved' wealth. It is now commonly used in editorial cartoons.[15][16][17] In the British printed media, a fat cat is usually depicted as a cat-faced, clad in a pin striped suit corpulent middle-aged man holding or smoking a thick cigar representing a venal banker or a high earner executive or "captain of industry".
See also
References
- ^ "Of Fat Cats and Other Angels". Time. November 29, 1971. Retrieved 2008-03-31.
- ^ Richard L. Berke (February 17, 2002). "Money Talks; Don't Discount the Fat Cats". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-31.
- ^ "Fat cats feeding". The Economist. 2003-10-09.
- ^ Fat Cat, in Ayto, John (2006). Movers and Shakers: A Chronology of Words that Shaped Our Age, Oxford University Press
- ^ Merriam Webster Online, fat cat
- ^ "Scratching the First Teflon Presidency: Frank Kent vs. Franklin Roosevelt". United States Department of Education. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
- ^ a b David G. Farber (2002). Sloan Rules: Alfred P. Sloan and the Triumph of General Motors. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-23804-0.
- ^ "Plenty of Jack". TIME. March 28, 1960. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
- ^ G. William Domhoff (March 2005). "Third Parties Don't Work: Why and How Egalitarians Should Transform the Democratic Party". Retrieved 2008-04-05.
- ^ Jean Hardisty (1999). Mobilizing Resentment: Conservative Resurgence from the John Birch Society to the Promise Keepers. Wilma P. Mankiller. Beacon Press. ISBN 0-8070-4317-6.
- ^ Ben J. Wattenberg (1984). The Good News is the Bad News is Wrong. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-671-60641-7.
- ^ Francis X. Clines (May 14, 1997). "A Dining-for-Dollars Gala Fattens the G.O.P.'s Coffers". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
- ^ a b Rebecca Sinderbrand (March 27, 2008). "MoveOn takes on Clinton's moneyed supporters". CNN.com. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
- ^ Lindsay Renick Mayer (March 27, 2008). "Democratic Donors Send $24 Million Letter to Pelosi". Public Eye. Center for Responsive Politics. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
- ^ The Guardian. London http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/cartoons/2002/07/23/bell2307.jpg.
{{cite news}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ http://www.news-press.com/multimedia/galleries/dougstatetoons/images/019MacGregor%20723%20%20Fat%20Cats.jpg
- ^ http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/df200304/df20030404.jpg
External links
