Talk:Graphene: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene |
No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
I'm looking at this in school and this is incomprehensible for me. Please help! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2.98.232.137|2.98.232.137]] ([[User talk:2.98.232.137|talk]]) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I'm looking at this in school and this is incomprehensible for me. Please help! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2.98.232.137|2.98.232.137]] ([[User talk:2.98.232.137|talk]]) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:Does [[simple:Graphene]] help? [[User:Neo Poz|Neo Poz]] ([[User talk:Neo Poz|talk]]) 03:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC) |
:Does [[simple:Graphene]] help? [[User:Neo Poz|Neo Poz]] ([[User talk:Neo Poz|talk]]) 03:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
==Article's complexity == |
|||
This is a complex article but nevertheless very clear and well-written with many references and links. I don't think it is "too complex" at all and offer my thanks to the editors who made this admittedly difficult subject mater understandable and an excellent springboard for further reading and for gaining valuable insight into some of what is happening with graphene research and development. So, please don't dumb down this article. [[User:Calicocat|Calicocat]] ([[User talk:Calicocat|talk]]) 15:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:47, 15 March 2013
Graphene was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
Physics C‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Chemicals Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
I can't understand this
I'm looking at this in school and this is incomprehensible for me. Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.232.137 (talk) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Does simple:Graphene help? Neo Poz (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Article's complexity
This is a complex article but nevertheless very clear and well-written with many references and links. I don't think it is "too complex" at all and offer my thanks to the editors who made this admittedly difficult subject mater understandable and an excellent springboard for further reading and for gaining valuable insight into some of what is happening with graphene research and development. So, please don't dumb down this article. Calicocat (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)