Jump to content

Talk:Graphene: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Neo Poz (talk | contribs)
http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
I'm looking at this in school and this is incomprehensible for me. Please help! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2.98.232.137|2.98.232.137]] ([[User talk:2.98.232.137|talk]]) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I'm looking at this in school and this is incomprehensible for me. Please help! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2.98.232.137|2.98.232.137]] ([[User talk:2.98.232.137|talk]]) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Does [[simple:Graphene]] help? [[User:Neo Poz|Neo Poz]] ([[User talk:Neo Poz|talk]]) 03:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
:Does [[simple:Graphene]] help? [[User:Neo Poz|Neo Poz]] ([[User talk:Neo Poz|talk]]) 03:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

==Article's complexity ==

This is a complex article but nevertheless very clear and well-written with many references and links. I don't think it is "too complex" at all and offer my thanks to the editors who made this admittedly difficult subject mater understandable and an excellent springboard for further reading and for gaining valuable insight into some of what is happening with graphene research and development. So, please don't dumb down this article. [[User:Calicocat|Calicocat]] ([[User talk:Calicocat|talk]]) 15:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:47, 15 March 2013

Former good article nomineeGraphene was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 3, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
WikiProject iconPhysics C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChemicals Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I can't understand this

I'm looking at this in school and this is incomprehensible for me. Please help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.98.232.137 (talk) 20:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does simple:Graphene help? Neo Poz (talk) 03:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article's complexity

This is a complex article but nevertheless very clear and well-written with many references and links. I don't think it is "too complex" at all and offer my thanks to the editors who made this admittedly difficult subject mater understandable and an excellent springboard for further reading and for gaining valuable insight into some of what is happening with graphene research and development. So, please don't dumb down this article. Calicocat (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]