Talk:Métis: Difference between revisions
→Phonetic sounds for Metis: new section |
|||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
[[User:Murmullo|Murmullo]] ([[User talk:Murmullo|talk]]) 15:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC) |
[[User:Murmullo|Murmullo]] ([[User talk:Murmullo|talk]]) 15:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Phonetic sounds for Metis == |
|||
I am wondering why someone used Greek letters for the pronunciation?[[User:Domsta333|Domsta333]] ([[User talk:Domsta333|talk]]) 12:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:51, 23 March 2013
Canada: Ontario / Manitoba / British Columbia / Saskatchewan / Alberta Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ethnic groups Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||
|
Indigenous peoples of North America Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Redirect from Mestee
Mestee is a separate word from Métis. The Métis are a specific first nation with a particular mixed heritage of a certain tribe and french fur traders. Mestee refers to any first nations (of any nation) people of mixed white, indian and oftentimes African descent. Two different terms entirely. Mestee is not in a lot of use these days, hence the confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.101.149.246 (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Usage of 'Métis'
I was just looking for information about the vietnaam and noticed that this page makes it look like metis people only means the mixed native people of canada. Metis is used to refer to many other mixed people. For example the mixed vietnamese-french people (many of which were born during or after the war in vietnam). Someone with more wiki-courage should edit this page ;). MisterSheik 03:26, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Good point. I'm going to move this page to Métis people (Canada), and then someone can provide a more general article here. John FitzGerald 01:13, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I added a stub here as well, mainly cribbed from the French side. Now, before changing all those links that need to be changed, I'm going to wait and see if anyone moves the old article back – if someone has a better way to handle this problem I'll be all for it. John FitzGerald 01:36, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Changes in preparation for the merge
As a Canadian Metis, I made some big changes to this article which I thought better repesented the wiki-interests to merge the terms metis and mestizo. I tried to make language of the article more neutral so the term metis could be used in a cursory manner for the Metis Nation of Canada but disentangle the article from its former narrow association to the new wider desired use of the word (ie. to merge it with other article). Northernstar79 07:37, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
I'm not Métis, though many of my friends have been, but from what I understand, since the 1982 Constitution or maybe since some agreement since, the term Metis in Canada means not only the traditional Metis of the Prairies as described in the current article, but also anyone of a certain percentage of mixed-blood people of status descent as well as the original Métis. I'm not sure about Metis politics, but I think there's a parallel Metis organization for the non-traditional Metis. At least there is here in BC. Maybe they've amalgamated nationally or something?
Skookum1 07:33, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
In Québec high-school history class we were taught that métis meant the off-spring of a white-male and female-native. This is why this term is confusing as it has different meanings depending on what part of Canada you are from and sometimes it gives a person certain status and other times no. For example, I had met Ontario hunters who would one distant Native ancestor to get their métis card so they could hunt off-season in Algonquin park. Murmullo (talk) 15:22, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
I am a Metis, I have ancestry connections to the red river fur trade. The term Metis is used rather loosely. The traditions, culture, and customs associated with My culture, are passed down generation to generation, and elders i n my community, still speak michif. Since we the Metis didn't sign treaties, and being a highly mobile people, business men, and diplomats we opened up the west to the start of the Canadian Nation, we still are here. Before the Canadian flag, the Metis flag, was and is still here. Our flag still eclipses this Canadian flag.
To be canadian is, that of a country that has many languages and no distinct culture itself. Apparently to be a culture or a canadian eh! have to love hockey, and go to work, and talk down everyone that is aboriginal. I am Metis, i fish without a license, i hunt without a tag, and i don't care about the size of the horns, i care about the taste of the meat. I can do the jig, and dance on the candian flag, I will wear my metis sash.
(a metis without borders) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.36.142.95 (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Métis
Theres a massive diference between Métis of Canada and Mestizo of Latin America. Starting with the history (Lous Riel etc) right through to diferences in acceptance within society.
These articles ought not to be merged, but rather the article on Métis needs to be expanded.
- Which is precisely why there is an article for the Métis of Canada. --Kmsiever 16:21, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- The rationale for the merge eludes me. The term Métis is French (hence use of it in Vietnam). However, "The Métis" really only refers to the people in Canada. "Mestizo" is only related in a very general way (people of European/Aboriginal origin). Beyond a one-line statement to that effect there's not much more that the peoples have in common. What's with this merge mania? Sunray 21:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Merge?
How come there's a separate article for the word Métis? The modern ethnic group in North America is already dealt with in Métis people, and the use of this French word to refer to people elsewhere is explained under Mestizo. If this article is intended to refer to anyone of part-French ancestry from Indochina to the Pacific to the Caribbean, then I think it should be much more explicit about that. //Big Adamsky 21:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Do not merge the articles. Métis relates to Canada, Mestizo relates to Latin America, therefore they are different concepts. -- OldRightist 07:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- My point was that the articles explaining the non-English words Métis, Mestizo, Mestiço, Mestiso and Mischling are all used both in their non-specific sense of "mixed-race" and in a more specific meaning referring to a particular group of people in a particlar geographical setting. But for Métis there are separate articles for the generic meaning and the particular North American meaning. As already stated, other people in other parts of the world also are identified and self-identify as métis/métisses. My point being that mestizo means different things depending on whether you are in Latin America or elsewhere in the world. Compare Mulatto which can only refer to one mixture (black + white; although no longer in any fixed proportions). //Big Adamsky 16:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- As I wrote at Talk:Mestizo I think they could profitably be merged, as long as the current article is not replaced by a redirect but by an explanation providing links to Mestizo and Métis people (okay, I didn't write tht last part before). And I agree that in a general sense the two words mean the same thing. John FitzGerald 03:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- I think there is some confusion here. Métis is a distinctly Canadian term. The closest french equivalent is Métisse (which is most often used to mean "French and Black" mixes). Some Métis do refer to themselves as Métisse, but that is a preference. To put another point of view on this article, consider that in Section 35 of the Constitution act of Canada that "Indian, Métis and Inuit" are labelled as the Aboriginal Peoples of Canada. Add to this that these are distinct groups and are not meant to be generic in nature as the constitution of Canada then reaffirms that these groups have rights. In order to confer rights, there must be a distinct membership. Without entering into the ensuing political and legal debate, suffice to say that merger is inappropriate. While Métis, may have come from Métisse which may have come from another root latin word: These words no longer mean the same thing. To be simply mixed blood in Canada does not confer Aboriginal rights, no matter the blood quantum. For those interested, look up R. Vs. Powley for more information on Métis legality issues and identity. For etymological reasons, a link to similar root words may be interesting, but I think a merger is unwarranted and would end up being confusing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.53.89.131 (talk • contribs) (06:40, 10 March 2006)
- As I wrote at Talk:Mestizo I think they could profitably be merged, as long as the current article is not replaced by a redirect but by an explanation providing links to Mestizo and Métis people (okay, I didn't write tht last part before). And I agree that in a general sense the two words mean the same thing. John FitzGerald 03:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- My point was that the articles explaining the non-English words Métis, Mestizo, Mestiço, Mestiso and Mischling are all used both in their non-specific sense of "mixed-race" and in a more specific meaning referring to a particular group of people in a particlar geographical setting. But for Métis there are separate articles for the generic meaning and the particular North American meaning. As already stated, other people in other parts of the world also are identified and self-identify as métis/métisses. My point being that mestizo means different things depending on whether you are in Latin America or elsewhere in the world. Compare Mulatto which can only refer to one mixture (black + white; although no longer in any fixed proportions). //Big Adamsky 16:41, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
French Wikipedia article
The french wikipedia article [1]on Métis explains the use of the word in French and the different groups around the world. That article simply provides a link to Mestizo. Personally, I think there should be a page for the general term "Métis" and then links to articles about the different groups around the world as each has their own history.--Raisaroo 00:06, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Re: Terminology Section
I don't agree with this terminology section. The encyclopedia of Canada [2] makes a distinction between the small 'm' métis and capitalize Métis. Further, in the métis music article it says:
Métis. Métis are found in every region in Canada and may be defined as any persons who have mixed Indian and European ancestry and who do not have Indian status.
This section is confusing and should be either deleted or moved to Métis people (Canada). Further to this suggestion we ought to get rid of the infobox.
Murmullo (talk) 15:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Phonetic sounds for Metis
I am wondering why someone used Greek letters for the pronunciation?Domsta333 (talk) 12:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- High-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Ontario articles
- High-importance Ontario articles
- Start-Class Manitoba articles
- High-importance Manitoba articles
- Start-Class British Columbia articles
- High-importance British Columbia articles
- Start-Class Saskatchewan articles
- High-importance Saskatchewan articles
- Start-Class Alberta articles
- High-importance Alberta articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Mid-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- Start-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Unknown-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles