User talk:Jimfbleak

Jim	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Logs	Blocks	Deletions	Protections	Scripts	Bird talk	Commons

Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.

Tauscher_Cronacher_Professional_Engineers

Looks like you deleted this page because you believed it to be marketing related content. I'm curious why a company with a 50+ year history and ties to the industry's organizations with fact based content, dates, names and references was considered marketing. There was no personal opinion, adjective descriptors, company promoting or self promoting content on this page - it was factual information only and was checked to be apple to apples against the other pages in the same categories. and Can you please let me know why you didn't just mark as to what improvements could be made and not delete altogether? I am happy to oblige and provide additional source citations and back-up, but it is clear that this company is certainly notable, if not more so, than many in the same category. I'm open to suggestions, but not deletions without merit. Let me know how we can resolve. Thanks, Lkutaj (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2013 (UTC)lkutaj

Delete article NANOPCM

Dear Jimfbleak,

You deleted my article and I answered to the speedy deletion. Could you let me know if I can submit again that article?

If you disagree, I would like to know which part of the article seems a commercial promotion in order to delet it specifically.

Thank you for your understanding,

Regards

Mongarort2

Mongarort2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mongarort2 (talk • contribs) 08:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC) --Mongarort2 (talk) 10:36, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete my article of Mezbaan

Hi Jimfbleak, I created a article named Mezbaan, but it is deleted by you. Please know me about why you deleted that? Nasrum50 (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC) My email address : nasrumparag@gmail.com

Thanks!

Delete my article

Hi,

I got message from you, I deleted your article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.

Please provide me information how to make independent verifiable my article?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpan tanna (talk • contribs) 07:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Christian Initiative Romero

I replied to your message on my talk page :) — Hebrides (talk) 13:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of article Kan Pesum Vaarthaigal

Hi, I noticed that you deleted the article Kan Pesum Vaarthaigal without any notification. Can you state why, so that I can improve the article :). Cheers BINOY ^Talk 07:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

The question has also been asked at WP:HD as to why you believed that A7 applied to an article about a film, as A7 says "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works." - David Biddulph (talk) 07:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

@David. I know that that books etc can't be A7'd but I've regularly deleted films, particularly of the Youtube or student project variety. If you are telling me that all these great creative efforts are exempt, it is very depressing. I appreciate that this is a real film, but presumably your interpretation of the criteria covers all or none. I've unprotected the page now anyway

@Binoyjsdk. It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines for films.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I didn't write the A7 criterion, and you could (if you wished) suggest an amendment to it, but it seems clearly worded at present. I am, of course, not commenting on the specifics of that article. - David Biddulph (talk) 12:48, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply and also for restoring the article. Now editors can discuss or try to improve the article. The Hindu, Times of India, CNN-IBN are considered as reliable sources and are used in so many articles. Also, I know you are busy but please try to inform the article's creator and major contributors after deleting the page. :)

Happy Editing and have a nice weekend. BINOY ^Talk 17:55, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kan Pesum Vaarthaigal

I would ask that you consider a withdrawal as the topic has more than enough coverage to nicely meet WP:NF. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:36, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for revisiting. best, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jim, don't want to tread on any toes but I've closed the AFD as a speedy keep, the film does appear to meet guidelines as a current Tamil movie, and I think it would waste time prolonging the AFD when I don't think it would be anything other than keep. I can see why you nominated it though. Regards.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 08:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I lost my article WTF!

Some user named Darkwind deleted the article to the white noise a tale of horror page and i can't revert it that's stupid, i worked on that article for days and some piece of useless life as to go off and delete articles with direct permission from me or an authority figure what the hell is going on here. --Indienews (talk) 11:36, 8 April 2013 (UTC)