Talk:List of Activision video games: Difference between revisions
→Rodney's Funscreen also on Macintosh: new section |
→Table/List entries, the disparity: new section |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I had Rodney's Funscreen (properly running, played it many times) on my OS 7-era Macintosh when I was a little boy. So, it clearly was not exclusively a Windows game. [[User:The Mysterious El Willstro|The Mysterious El Willstro]] ([[User talk:The Mysterious El Willstro|talk]]) 05:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC) |
I had Rodney's Funscreen (properly running, played it many times) on my OS 7-era Macintosh when I was a little boy. So, it clearly was not exclusively a Windows game. [[User:The Mysterious El Willstro|The Mysterious El Willstro]] ([[User talk:The Mysterious El Willstro|talk]]) 05:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Table/List entries, the disparity == |
|||
Disparity in article style. It seems a user has began transforming the article from a alphabetical list into a table. I agree with this action as it allows users to sort by date etc... but is unfinished. As it stands it makes the article seem sloppy with the two conflicting styles of information present. Maybe the article should be flagged for moderation to finish or revert the conversion? |
|||
This raises the question that maybe pages should be able to have branch revisions? The 'Main' branch which preserves page content whilst the 'Working' branch is the next version of that page. When a page is under drastic alteration it would be best to not face these half-edited/corrected pages until either the original author or a mod can finish the spring clean and commit the page. |
Revision as of 08:20, 2 August 2013
![]() | Indexes | |||
|
Rodney's Funscreen also on Macintosh
I had Rodney's Funscreen (properly running, played it many times) on my OS 7-era Macintosh when I was a little boy. So, it clearly was not exclusively a Windows game. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 05:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Table/List entries, the disparity
Disparity in article style. It seems a user has began transforming the article from a alphabetical list into a table. I agree with this action as it allows users to sort by date etc... but is unfinished. As it stands it makes the article seem sloppy with the two conflicting styles of information present. Maybe the article should be flagged for moderation to finish or revert the conversion?
This raises the question that maybe pages should be able to have branch revisions? The 'Main' branch which preserves page content whilst the 'Working' branch is the next version of that page. When a page is under drastic alteration it would be best to not face these half-edited/corrected pages until either the original author or a mod can finish the spring clean and commit the page.