Jump to content

Talk:Love Minus Zero/No Limit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
CactusBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Dead links for Allmusic
J-a-x (talk | contribs)
→‎Song Title: new section
Line 43: Line 43:
* http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=17:2793478
* http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=17:2793478
--[[User:CactusBot|CactusBot]] ([[User talk:CactusBot|talk]]) 18:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
--[[User:CactusBot|CactusBot]] ([[User talk:CactusBot|talk]]) 18:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

== Song Title ==

I take issue with the fact that this article says 'In theory, the resulting quotient would be equal to "absolutely unlimited love.". I can't read the references since it's not online, but anything divided by infinity is zero, not "absolutely unlimited".
(love-0) / infinity
= love / infinity
= 0

Does anybody have any alternate explanation of the title?

Revision as of 14:34, 4 August 2013

Good articleLove Minus Zero/No Limit has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 26, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 2, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know

The image Image:BringingHome.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Look Back

A snippet from a live performance of "Love Minus Zero/No Limit" is also shown in the movie Don't Look Back.

It would be helpful to remove the ambiguity of this statement. Yes, it's a live performance, but it's more like an informal gathering in a hotel room, is it not? Viriditas (talk)

Can we determine if it was in a hotel or a private home? Viriditas (talk) 03:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

Please expand the lead, highlighting the most notable aspects of each section, including notable recordings and performances, and critical commentary. Viriditas (talk) 03:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Love Minus Zero/No Limit/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Prose read well, complies with MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    There is a problem with ref #17 [1]. This returns a null search page. Better to stick with ref#5 which returns the full list of versions by Dylan and others. Green tickY
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    None used
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    OK, if the ref problem above can be fixed this will pass. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Cool, thanks for fixing that, I tried but couldn't. I am happy to promote this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 03:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Song Title

I take issue with the fact that this article says 'In theory, the resulting quotient would be equal to "absolutely unlimited love.". I can't read the references since it's not online, but anything divided by infinity is zero, not "absolutely unlimited".

  (love-0) / infinity

= love / infinity = 0

Does anybody have any alternate explanation of the title?