User talk:Bencherlite: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:13, 27 September 2013

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bencherlite.

Archives

1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30 • 31 • 32 • 33 • 34 • 35

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DNGK/Citizen exploitation (2nd nomination)

It might be possible that someone will want to fix the article, even if nobody did earlier. Please relist. (I'm not sure I personally do, but I want a few days to think about it. DGG ( talk ) 17:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, FWIW. Bencherlite ^Talk 17:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

Hi! Thanks for your suggestion at the FLC here. I've had a go at sorting the sorting. It is OK now? --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:49, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/CSD pseudo-namespace

You did not provide a valid reason for closing this. I would therefore ask that you reopen the discussion. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree and will not reopen it. "Keep, moot, historical, meh" was a valid - even if slightly flippant - summary of the strongest arguments. The RFC has been closed since the MFD got underway, so forum-shopping arguments for deletion carried much less weight than they did when the RFC was still open; now that it has been closed, the RFC is not going to change anything, so there's no need to waste time deciding whether it was the proper way of doing things or whether the underlying issue should have done somewhere else; in fact, whether it was a good RFC or not is moot now that it has been closed; making the RFC visible only to administrators achieves nothing in such circumstances; keeping it around as a historical record at least shows everyone what happened and why it was closed down as a bad idea. Or, in other words, I found that the strongest arguments were those of Jayron32 and Gigs, and saw no point in having a continuing meta-debate about whether a closed RFC should be deleted. If you want to prolong the meta-debate about all this, then feel free to waste your time at WP:DRV but frankly everyone should have better things to do with their time than to argue about whether Wikipedia:Requests for comment/CSD pseudo-namespace should be turned into a redlink. Bencherlite ^Talk 20:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whaam! OTD eligibility on 28th

(comments moved to Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/September 28#2013 notes)--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 08:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Have replied. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh, thanks. Sorry I haven't replied. Basically I need to work out for myself how many dates might be free/suitable and what articles could be used - I'm thinking about 4, possibly 5, in the last week of October. I have a hellish few days of work and family busy-ness ahead, so I can't do much now about it. Bencherlite ^Talk 19:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh boy. I'll pull what I had for October 1 and replace it, perhaps. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Diptych

"A work consisting of two painted or carved panels ->that are hinged together<-." That's why I changed it.

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 :Yeh, thanks.  Sorry I haven't replied.  Basically I need to work out for myself how many dates might be free/suitable and what articles could be used - I'm thinking about 4, possibly 5, in the last week of October.  I have a hellish few days of work and family busy-ness ahead, so I can't do much now about it.  [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 19:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 :*Oh boy. I'll pull what I had for October 1 and replace it, perhaps.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 22:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
+== Diptych ==
+"A work consisting of two painted or carved panels ->that are hinged together<-." That's why I changed it.