User talk:Twsx: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:09, 22 January 2014

Talk page is clean again :-)

Woop-di-doo. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 13:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

zahir rana MLM

zahir rana(zedaar)from Ahmadabad in 2001 started a multi level marketing in Ahmadabad Gujarat and by his some project he had rocked the entire state. his offices were across India and his mind is most talented in multi level marketing. other business also he started afterwards still he is on an multi level marketing project which is amazing and if any advice is needed for multi level marketing i would request every one to take from him and to always follow the master mind zedaar he says "always to do a work which no one is able to do."by which you will be different and to you people will give respect. now he is on project of second earning which is an multi level marketing project and by which all people can "convert their expense into income" and can earn money by spending which is an interesting project — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingzaid007 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

why were my changes undone

First of all http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karuneegar had a detailed description, and now you have removed it. I added content to it and cited websites supporting that. Why was it removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.240.197.233 (talk) 11:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I think you may have thr wrong guy – I have not made any edit to this article. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 11:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it was a mistake I was just looking threw the history

My user page

Hello and well met. Thanks for the tip on the unclosed bold tag on my User page. I just recently created it, and it seems the more I try to "fix" it, the more I mess it up! I removed it, and now it's good for another laugh! Rhinestone K (talk) 16:29, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So fast

You fight vandalism so incredibly fast that you sometimes forget to look at the surrounding Booga Booga ;-) - DVdm (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FIFPro

As recently I browsed the tweets on hashtag #TOTY, and I found out a picture of a leaked Ballon D'Or pre-ceremony. Should I post leaked contents onto the article? --180.183.242.110 (talk) 15:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@180.183.242.110: Hello. I had to do some Google-ing before I actually knew what you were talking about. The answer is no, this is not what Wikipedia is for. You can flick through the policy article section, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, if you want. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 15:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my friend

My idiot friends have edited many pages across wiki with my IP address. I do apoligize

Sorry my friend

My idiot friends have edited many pages across wiki with my IP address. I do apoligize — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.248.242.150 (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Friend

Hi, I need to know why delete what I edited for release in El Salvador, Honduras, Ecuador and Paraguay (which opens today). Can I have Might responding. Let me help you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.34.108.172 (talk • contribs)

Hello @190.34.108.172:. Removing whole sections from articles without any form of explanation is generally not a good idea. I recommend you read the essay found at WP:RMV. Now, if you feel it makes sense to remove an entire section, I recommend you initiate a conversation on the article's talk page. If you feel you can sufficiently explain it in just one sentence, you can also put it in the edit summary, however, this may still trigger some alarms. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 13:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legit facts should stand

So how do You mean its less constructive, to have a fact about the person being sentenced in court for a narcotics crime, than it is to tell what products he has made advertisments for?

It is a fact with well renowned references, that You can check Yourself. http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/courts/swedish-model-tv-personality-jailed-for-life-in-dubai-for-for-possessing-21-grams-of-cocaine-1.1277910 http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article18183753.ab http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Farzan+Athari/People+Choice+Awards+2010+Red+Carpet/HPkr3zTLIuk

If You have issues with that? its not to stand in the way for facts. Further there is a court decision and according to Wiki´s rules then it is legit to publish it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.227.59.31 (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @87.227.59.31: I've reverted your edit because it was not written in English. If you have sensible/sourced facts to add to the article, please do so, in English. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 12:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Fernando Francés

Hello Twsx. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fernando Francés, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: there is enough here to pass the low bar of WP:CSD#A7. Let's see if someone will translate it. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Cheers. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 16:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Jonathan Trevor

Hi I had recently posted a review of the film on my personal blog as well as a trailer, I'm new so maybe you tell me if it was wrong but i honestly think it is a good resource and a reader would get some more value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Trevor (talk • contribs) 13:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jonathan Trevor: Your additions to the articles were removed because personal blogs, such as yours, violate Wikipedia's external links policy. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 13:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KQBT

I removed the redirect of KQBT from the KQTM page because those (KQBT) call letters have replaced KKRW Houston as of January 15, 2014. I was trying to apply them to the proper page and make note of it on the current KKRW page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djrage (talk • contribs) 15:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Djrage. At this point in time, the article at KQTM seems to still be in placed. If the subject of that page was renamed, the article should be moved and any redirects to it fixed then. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 15:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KQBT in Albuquerque, New Mexico, has been KQTM since 2008. All information on the now KQTM page do reflect this. I was trying to apply the change of calls and proper redirect of KQBT to the now former KKRW page. I have applied all of the proper changes to that page John Fernandez (talk) 16:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Watching for tampering at Nawab Faizunnessa Govt Girls' High School

Greetings, thanks for helping out at Nawab Faizunnessa Govt Girls' High School, but there's an earlier version that is properly sourced that I made yesterday or so, so I've reverted it to that. Some accounts/IPs which claim an affiliation with the school keep reverting it back to their preferred promotional and poorly-formatted version, so if this persists we may end up locking the article until they go away. They're becoming increasingly hostile too. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

For dealing with Nawab Faizunnesa Government Girls' High School - Wow! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sirakshat (talk) 08:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)== I think you have reverted my changes in error. ==[reply]

Untitled

Hello Flo,

Akshat Here.

I think you have reverted my changes on the page "Once Upon A Time In Mumbai Dobaraa!" erroneously. As far as the correct spelling of the title is concerned, I took help of a number of links provided at the bottom of the page, which prove my point. Further, you may want to check IMDB regarding the correct spelling of the movie title.

Please check and reply with your thoughts..

Thanks.Sirakshat (talk) 08:09, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sirakshat. Seems like it indeed. Huggle marked your edits as vandalism for some reason. I should have checked a little closer. Everyday's a school day. :) I've reverted my edit, sorry for the interference. Happy editing! ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 08:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sirakshat (talk) 08:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)== It's completely fine. Afterall, we are all trying to make data presentation better and accurate. ==[reply]

@twsx - It's completely fine, my friend. Thanks for your efforts and have a good day. By the by, in case you want to keep in touch, you may like to add me on facebook, by doing a search with my email id : sirakshat@yahoo.com.

Thanks and Regards, Akshat.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirakshat (talk • contribs)

Obvious error

As per editing Charlie Ray page, AfD is stated. Upon actually reading AfD, there are more KEEP votes than DELETE votes. Article should be kept in original form. 71.82.209.86 (talk) 08:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @71.82.209.86. Please see my reply on Talk:Charlie Ray. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy. I can relate to this, I used to be new as well, and Wikipedia policy, customs and mannerisms can be hard to grasp at first (or sometimes, even now). However, given those circumstances, you may not want to be throwing around accusations and reverting people's edits. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 08:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you are so set in your misappropriated ways that you do not take the time to realize the actuality of the matter. The actress Charlie Ray has acted in recent films, thus the previous "shes did uun ting so les duhletes eet" caveman mentality is grossly outdated and extremely inappropriate. The page needs to stay in it's original form, not a redirect, and updated for current roles.

Revision as of 08:46, 22 January 2014 edit Twsx (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 34,642 edits →‎Obvious error: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:09, 22 January 2014 edit undo 71.82.209.86 (talk) →‎Obvious error Next edit →
Line 163:		Line 163:

	:Hello {{ping\|71.82.209.86\|p=}}. Please see my reply on [[Talk:Charlie Ray]]. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy. I can relate to this, I used to be new as well, and Wikipedia policy, customs and mannerisms can be hard to grasp at first (or sometimes, even now). However, given those circumstances, you may not want to be throwing around accusations and reverting people's edits. ~ <span style="color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;">\| <small>[[User:Twsx\|twsx]]</small> \| <small><sup>[[User talk:Twsx\|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Twsx\|cont]]</sub></small> \|</span> ~ 08:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)		:Hello {{ping\|71.82.209.86\|p=}}. Please see my reply on [[Talk:Charlie Ray]]. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of Wikipedia policy. I can relate to this, I used to be new as well, and Wikipedia policy, customs and mannerisms can be hard to grasp at first (or sometimes, even now). However, given those circumstances, you may not want to be throwing around accusations and reverting people's edits. ~ <span style="color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;">\| <small>[[User:Twsx\|twsx]]</small> \| <small><sup>[[User talk:Twsx\|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Twsx\|cont]]</sub></small> \|</span> ~ 08:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

			Obviously you are so set in your misappropriated ways that you do not take the time to realize the actuality of the matter. The actress Charlie Ray has acted in recent films, thus the previous "shes did uun ting so les duhletes eet" caveman mentality is grossly outdated and extremely inappropriate. The page needs to stay in it's original form, not a redirect, and updated for current roles.


twsX	talk!	eMail me	contribs	subpages	sandbox